0
Research Papers

Development of SNTA Code System for SCWR Core Steady-State Analysis

[+] Author and Article Information
Lianjie Wang

Science and Technology on Reactor System
Design Technology Laboratory,
Nuclear Power Institute of China,
No. 328, Section 1, Changshun Avenue,
Shuangliu County,
Chengdu 610213, China
e-mail: wanglianjie@npic.ac.cn

Wenbo Zhao

Science and Technology on Reactor System
Design Technology Laboratory,
Nuclear Power Institute of China,
No. 328, Section 1, Changshun Avenue,
Shuangliu County,
Chengdu 610213, China
e-mail: zhaowenbo.npic@gmail.com

Ping Yang

Science and Technology on Reactor System
Design Technology Laboratory,
Nuclear Power Institute of China,
No. 328, Section 1, Changshun Avenue,
Shuangliu County,
Chengdu 610213, China
e-mail: pyangxjtu@gmail.com

Yongqiang Ma

Science and Technology on Reactor System
Design Technology Laboratory,
Nuclear Power Institute of China,
No. 328, Section 1, Changshun Avenue,
Shuangliu County,
Chengdu 610213, China
e-mail: myq103@126.com

Di Lu

Science and Technology on Reactor System
Design Technology Laboratory,
Nuclear Power Institute of China,
No. 328, Section 1, Changshun Avenue,
Shuangliu County,
Chengdu 610213, China
e-mail: ludyhao@126.com

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received May 23, 2016; final manuscript received October 11, 2016; published online March 1, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Mark Anderson.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 3(2), 021005 (Mar 01, 2017) (6 pages) Paper No: NERS-16-1050; doi: 10.1115/1.4035334 History: Received May 23, 2016; Revised October 11, 2016

A coupled neutronics/thermal-hydraulics (N/T) three-dimensional code system SNTA is developed for supercritical water-cooled reactor (SCWR) core steady-state analysis by modular coupling the improved neutronics nodal methodological code and SCWR thermal-hydraulic subchannel code. The appropriate outer iteration coupling method and self-adaptive relaxation factor are proposed for enhancing convergence, stability, and efficiency of coupled N/T calculation. The steady-state analysis for the CSR1000 core is applied to verify SNTA. The results calculated by SNTA agreed well with those by CASIR and SRAC. SNTA is more efficient than CASIR and SRAC, where the neutronics modules are based on the finite-difference method. The numeric results show that SNTA can be applied to SCWR core steady-state analysis and core concept design.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Flow chart of neutronics and thermal-hydraulics coupling for steady state

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

CSR1000 fuel assembly

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

CSR1000 core configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Water flow scheme of CSR1000

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of core axial power distributions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of quarter core radial power distributions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of the first flow path coolant axial density distributions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of the second flow path coolant axial density distributions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of core outlet coolant density distributions (second flow path)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In