0
Special Section Papers

Analysis of Late Phase Severe Accident Phenomena in CANDU Plant

[+] Author and Article Information
D. Dupleac

Power Plant Engineering Faculty,
Politehnica University,
313 Splaiul Independentei, Sector 6,
Bucharest 060042, Romania
e-mail: danieldu@cne.pub.ro

Manuscript received July 30, 2016; final manuscript received December 5, 2016; published online March 1, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Arun Nayak.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 3(2), 020904 (Mar 01, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: NERS-16-1085; doi: 10.1115/1.4035416 History: Received July 30, 2016; Revised December 05, 2016

The paper overviews the analytical studies performed at Politehnica University of Bucharest on the analysis of late phase severe accident phenomena in a Canada Deuterium Uranium (CANDU) plant. The calculations start from a dry debris bed at the bottom of calandria vessel. Both SCDAPSIM/RELAP code and ansys-fluent computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code are used. Parametric studies are performed in order to quantify the effect of several identified sources of uncertainty on calandria vessel failure: metallic fraction of zirconium inside the debris, containment pressure, timing of water depletion inside calandria vessel, steam circulation in calandria vessel above debris bed, debris temperature at moment of water depletion inside calandria vessel, calandria vault nodalization, and the gap heat transfer coefficient.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Terminal debris bed formed on CV bottom, externally cooled by calandria vault water

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Nodalization of the in-vessel retention model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Variation of the time of the CV failure time with the mass fraction of oxidized zirconium (for area of steam circulation above debris 0.5 m and heat transfer coefficient in the gap between debris and CV = 500 W/m2K)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Temperature of the bottom calandria vessel wall

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Calandria vault water level

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Molten fraction of the debris

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Debris bed temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Downward heat flux profile

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Variation of the time of the CV failure time with the gap heat transfer coefficient (for area of steam circulation above debris 0.5 m and 100% mass fraction of oxidized zirconium)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Variation of the CV wall maximum heat flu with the mass fraction of oxidized zirconium (for area of steam circulation above debris 0.5 m and heat transfer coefficient in the gap between debris and CV = 500 W/m2K)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Variation of the CV wall rupture angle with the mass fraction of oxidized zirconium (for area o steam circulation above debris 0.5 m and heat transfer coefficient in the gap between debris and CV = 500 W/m2K)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Maximum calandria vessel wall heat flux

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Maximum external calandria vessel wall heat flux

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Temperature distribution on debris centreline at t = 8.3 h

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Maximum value of calandria wall heat flux

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In