0
Research Papers

Research on the Application of Fen for Environmentally Assisted Fatigue Evaluation of the Austenitic SS Pipe Under Combined Transient Loads

[+] Author and Article Information
Bingbing Liang

Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research &
Design Institute,
No. 29 Hongcao Road,
Shanghai 200233, China
e-mail: lbb@snerdi.com.cn

Xu Zhang

Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research &
Design Institute,
No. 29 Hongcao Road,
Shanghai 200233, China
e-mail: zhangxu9@snerdi.com.cn

Haifeng Yin

Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research &
Design Institute,
No. 29 Hongcao Road,
Shanghai 200233, China
e-mail: yinhf@snerdi.com.cn

Yang Dai

Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research &
Design Institute,
No. 29 Hongcao Road,
Shanghai 200233, China
e-mail: daiyang@snerdi.com.cn

Manuscript received October 30, 2017; final manuscript received April 22, 2018; published online September 10, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Wenyue Zheng.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 4(4), 041009 (Sep 10, 2018) (6 pages) Paper No: NERS-17-1232; doi: 10.1115/1.4040368 History: Received October 30, 2017; Revised April 22, 2018

Accumulative test data indicate that the effects of the light water reactor (LWR) environment could cause the fatigue resistance of primary pressure boundary components materials to be significantly reduced. Environmentally assisted fatigue (EAF) is the abbreviation of the environmentally assisted fatigue. In 2007, Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued RG. 1.207. It was updated in 2014. And, it requires that the effects of LWR environment on the fatigue life reduction of metal components should be considered for new design plants. And it suggests to use environmental correction factor, Fen, to account for EAF. NRC regulation (NUREG), NUREG/CR-6909 (NRC, 2013, “Effect of LWR Coolant Environments on the Fatigue Life of Reactor Materials,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Argonne, IL, Standard no. NUREG/CR-6909), presents the detail Fen calculation formula. Fen is a function of temperature, strain rate, dissolved oxygen level in water, and sulfur content of the steel. Accordingly, Fen calculation will present a comparatively conservative result. Depending on the experience of the primary pressure boundary piping transient operation, Fen varies during each transient. More uncertainty and confusion are raised during the application of the Fen method. The research work in this paper includes: first, the typical character of piping thermal transient is derived based on the existing experience. Second, small specimen EAF tests are conducted depending on the above derived combined loading characters. Then effort is taken to improve the application of the Fen method for the combined multitransient loading conditions. And the results are compared with those of the lowest instantaneous Fen method and equalization of the weighted Fen method. Finally, a designed test plan is presented.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

NRC, 2013, “ Effect of LWR Coolant Environments on the Fatigue Life of Reactor Materials,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Argonne, IL, Standard no. NUREG/CR-6909. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0706/ML070660620.pdf
NRC, 1995, “ Application of NUREG/CR-5999 Interim Fatigue Curves to Selected Nuclear Power Plant Components,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, Standard no. NUREG/CR-6260. https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:26063712
NRC, 2001, “ Standard Review Plan for Review of License Renewal Applications for Nuclear Power Plants,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, Standard No. NUREG-1800. https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1800/r2/index.html
ASME, 2013, “ ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Rules for Construction of Nuclear Power Plant Components,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. BPVC-III-5-2017. https://www.asme.org/products/codes-standards/bpvciii5-2017-bpvc-section-iiirules-construction
ASTM, 2004, “ Standard Practice for Strain-Controlled Fatigue Testing,” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No. ASTM E606-04. https://www.astm.org/Standards/E606.htm
Xinqiang, W. U. , Tan, J. , Song, X. U. , Han, E. H. , and Wei, K. E. , 2015, “ Corrosion Fatigue Mechanism of Nuclear-Grade Low Alloy Steel in High Temperature Pressurized Water and Its Environmental Fatigue Design Model,” Acta Metall. Sin., 51(3), pp. 298–306.
IAEA, 2003, “ Assessment and Management of Ageing of Major Nuclear Power Plant Components Important to Safety Primary Piping in PWRs,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, Standard No. IAEA-TECDOC-1361

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Strain amplitude (left) and rate (right) of transient 2 on evaluation point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Stress terms and total stress of transient 2 on evaluation point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Strain amplitude (left) and rate (right) of transient 1 on evaluation point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Stress terms and total stress of transient 1 on evaluation point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Waveform EAF test curves of group1, 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Sampling sketch of wrought main pipe in 1/4 wall thickness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Dimensions (units are in mm) and pictures of smooth bar fatigue specimen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The state of specimen before and after the high-temperature and high-pressure water waveform fatigue test

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In