0
Research Papers

Calibration of HPGe Detector Efficiencies With Self-Absorption Correction of Gas Sphere Sources

[+] Author and Article Information
Waseem Khan

School of Energy and Power Engineering,
Department of Nuclear Science and Technology,
Xi'an Jiaotong University,
Xi'an 710049, China

Chaohui He

School of Energy and Power Engineering,
Department of Nuclear Science and Technology,
Xi'an Jiaotong University,
Xi'an 710049, China
e-mail: hechaohui@xjtu.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received June 9, 2018; final manuscript received August 26, 2018; published online January 24, 2019. Assoc. Editor: Michal Kostal.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 5(1), 011018 (Jan 24, 2019) (8 pages) Paper No: NERS-18-1038; doi: 10.1115/1.4041338 History: Received June 09, 2018; Revised August 26, 2018

Several types of radioactive gases are released from the nuclear reactor. In order to measure the activity of such gases, it is necessary to calculate the accurate efficiency. Practically, efficiency calibration with gaseous sources is not very easy because of the low half-lives of the noble gases. For this purpose, Monte Carlo (MC) simulation was performed to study the full energy peak efficiency of two n-type high-purity Germanium (HPGe) detectors. Two spheres of xenon and krypton composition sources with two nuclides (Xe133andKr85) and two-point sources were simulated, covering the energy range from 81 keV to 604 keV. Self-absorption correction factors were calculated with GEANT4 for two gas sphere samples and obtained good efficiency agreement with the experimental results. The simulation was performed for various gas samples with different densities and observed their effects on the full energy peak efficiency value of two detectors. The corresponding self-absorption correction factors were calculated for each gaseous sample and investigated that the self-absorption correction factors not only depend on the sample characteristics but also on the detector geometry and source to detector distance. The dependence of the full energy peak efficiency on the side cap wall material and their thicknesses were also carried out for some particular photon energies.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Oishi, T. , Yoshida, M. , Saegusa, J. , Honda, T. , Takahashi, K. , and Kuwabara, H. , 2001, “Determination of Detection Efficiency Curve for a Gas Monitor With a Built-in Germanium Detector,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 38(3), pp. 203–208. [CrossRef]
Yoshida, M. , Oishi, T. , Saegusa, J. , Honda, T. , Takahashi, K. , and Kuwabara, H. , 1999, “A Calibration Technique for Radioactive Gas Monitor With a Built-in Germanium Detector,” JAERI J., 10, pp. 3a–151.
Kovar, P. , and Dryak, P. , 2008, “Gaseous Standards Preparation With the Radionuclide Ar-41 for Stack Monitors Calibration and Verification in Nuclear Facilities,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., 66(6–7), pp. 796–798. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Le Petit, G. , Jutier, C. , Gross, P. , and Greiner, V. , 2006, “Low-Level Activity Measurement of 131Xem, 133Xem, 135Xe and 133Xe in Atmospheric Air Samples Using High-Resolution Dual X–γ Spectrometry,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., 64(10–11), pp. 1307–1312. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mostajaboddavati, M. , Hassanzadeh, S. , and Faghihian, H. , 2006, “Efficiency Calibration and Measurement of Self-Absorption Correction for Environmental Gamma-Spectroscopy of Soil Samples Using Marinelli Beaker,” J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 268(3), pp. 539–544. [CrossRef]
Khater, A. , and Ebaid, Y. , 2008, “A Simplified Gamma-Ray Self-Attenuation Correction in Bulk Samples,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., 66 (3), pp. 407–413. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Robu, E. , and Giovani, C. , 2009, “Gamma-Ray Self-Attenuation Corrections in Environmental Samples,” Rom. Rep. Phys., 61(2), pp. 295–300.
Misiak, R. , Hajduk, R. , Stobiński, M. , Bartyzel, M. , Szarłowicz, K. , and Kubica, B. , 2011, “Self-Absorption Correction and Efficiency Calibration for Radioactivity Measurement of Environmental Samples by Gamma-Ray Spectrometry,” Nukleonika, 56(1), pp. 23–28. http://www.nukleonika.pl/www/back/full/vol56_2011/v56n1p023f.pdf
Quindós, L. , Sainz, C. , Fuente, I. , Nicolás, J. , Quindós, L. , and Arteche, J. , 2006, “Correction by Self-Attenuation in Gamma-Ray Spectrometry for Environmental Samples,” J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 270(2), pp. 339–343. [CrossRef]
El-Khatib, A. M. , Thabet, A. A. , Elzaher, M. A. , Badawi, M. S. , and Salem, B. A. , 2014, “Study on the Effect of the Self-Attenuation Coefficient on γ-Ray Detector Efficiency Calculated at Low and High Energy Regions,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 46(2), pp. 217–224. [CrossRef]
Pibida, L. , Nafee, S. , Unterweger, M. , Hammond, M. M. , Karam, L. , and Abbas, M. , 2007, “Calibration of HPGe Gamma-Ray Detectors for Measurement of Radioactive Noble Gas Sources,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., 65(2), pp. 225–233. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jose, M. , Baskar, S. , and Meenakshisundaram, V. , 2010, “Estimation of Radioactive Noble Gas Activity in FBTR–a Simple Method of Calibration of HPGe Detector,” IRPA12: 12. Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association: Strengthening Radiation Protection Worldwide-Highlights, Global Perspective and Future Trends, 1.
Pilleyre, T. , Sanzelle, S. , Miallier, D. , Fain, J. , and Courtine, F. , 2006, “Theoretical and Experimental Estimation of Self-Attenuation Corrections in Determination of 210Pb by γ-Spectrometry With Well Ge Detector,” Radiat. Meas., 41(3), pp. 323–329. [CrossRef]
Sarangapani, R. , Jose, M. , Srinivasan, T. , and Venkatraman, B. , 2017, “Determination of Efficiency of an Aged HPGe Detector for Gaseous Sources by Self Absorption Correction and Point Source Methods,” J. Instrum., 12(7), p. T07006. [CrossRef]
Saat, A. , Appleby, P. , and Nolan , 1997, “Self-Absorption Corrections of Various Sample-Detector Geometries in Gamma-Ray Spectrometry Using Sample Monte Carlo Simulations,” International Nuclear Conference: a new era in Nuclear Science and Technology, Oct. 27–28, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Hardy, J. , Iacob, V. , Sanchez-Vega, M. , Effinger, R. , and Lipnik, P. , 2002, “Precise Efficiency Calibration of an HPGe Detector: Source Measurements and Monte Carlo Calculations With Sub-Percent Precision,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., 56(1–2), pp. 65–69. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vargas, M. J. , Timón, A. F. , Dı́az, N. C. , and Sánchez, D. P. , 2002, “Monte Carlo Simulation of the Self-Absorption Corrections for Natural Samples in Gamma-Ray Spectrometry,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., 57(6), pp. 893–898. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Garcı́a-Talavera, M. , Neder, H. , Daza, M. , and Quintana, B. , 2000, “Towards a Proper Modeling of Detector and Source Characteristics in Monte Carlo Simulations,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., 52(3), pp. 777–783. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hernández Suárez, F. J. , 2002, “Optimisation of Environmental Gamma Spectrometry Using Monte Carlo Methods,” Acta Univ. Ups., 751, p. 64
Khan, W. , Zhang, Q. , He, C. , and Saleh, M. , 2018, “Monte Carlo Simulation of the Full Energy Peak Efficiency of an HPGe Detector,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., 131, pp. 67–70. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Variation of the full energy peak efficiency curve with density for D1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Variation of the full energy peak efficiency curve with density for D2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Variation of the full energy peak efficiency values with different side cap material of D1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variation of the full energy peak efficiency values with different side cap material of D2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of the experimental and simulated full energy peak efficiency values with different side cap thicknesses of D1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of the experimental and simulated full energy peak efficiency values with different side cap thicknesses of D2

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In