0
Research Papers

Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis for Asymmetric Power Generation in a Prismatic Fuel Block of Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Test Reactor

[+] Author and Article Information
Wen-Chi Cheng

Nuclear Reactor Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; Department of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University,
Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan

Kaichao Sun

Nuclear Reactor Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA 02139

Lin-Wen Hu

Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA 02139
e-mail: LWHU@mit.edu

Ching-Chang Chieng

Professor Emeritus National Tsing Hua University,
Hsinchu, Taiwan;
Visiting Professor
Department of Mechanical
and Biomedical Engineering,
City University of Hong Kong,
Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received June 4, 2014; final manuscript received September 26, 2014; published online February 9, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Thomas Schulenberg.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 1(1), 011003 (Feb 09, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: NERS-14-1009; doi: 10.1115/1.4026391 History: Received June 04, 2014; Accepted November 14, 2014; Online February 09, 2015

The fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature reactor (FHR) is an advanced reactor concept that uses tristructural isotropic (TRISO) high-temperature fuel and low-pressure liquid salt coolant. A 20-MWth test reactor, as the key step in demonstrating the technical feasibility, is currently under design at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. This study focuses on the coupled conduction and convection heat transfer adopting a three-dimensional unit-cell model with one coolant channel and six one-third fuel compacts. The laminar, transitional, and turbulent flows are investigated with the use of computational fluid dynamic (CFD) software, CD-adapco STARCCM+. The model is validated against theory for developing laminar flow in the benchmark study with excellent agreement. The model is also benchmarked for transitional and turbulent flows by Hausen, Gnielinski, Dittus-Boelter, and Sieder-Tate correlations. Azimuthal distributions of temperature, heat flux, and heat transfer coefficient along the coolant-graphite interface were obtained for the asymmetric heat source, graphite materials, and two different types of salt coolant. The results show that the asymmetric power generation has little impact on peak fuel temperature, interface temperature, and heat transfer coefficient for a unit-cell module in laminar flow regime due to effective thermal conduction of the graphite matrix. In the turbulent flow regime, the effect on the azimuthal heat flux and heat transfer coefficient is more pronounced.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Forsberg, C., Hu, L.-W., Peterson, P. F., and Sridharan Kumar, K., 2012, “Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactors (FHRs) for Base-Load and Peak Electricity, Grid Stabilization, and Process Heat,” MIT-ANP-TR-147, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Nuclear Systems Design Class, 2012, “Fluoride Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Test Reactor (FHTR).”
Travis, B. W., and El-Genk, M. S., 2012, “A Heat Transfer Correlation for Flow Channels in a Prismatic Core VHTR,” Trans. Fusion Sci. Technol., 61(1T), pp. 161–166.
Xiao, Y., Hu, L.-W., Forsberg, C., Qiu, S., Su, G., Chen, K., and Wang, N., 2014, “Analysis of the Limiting Safety System Settings of a Fluoride Salt Cooled High Temperature Test Reactor,” Nucl. Technol., 187(3), pp. 221–234. 10.13182/NT13-93
Snead, L. L., 2008, “Accumulation of Thermal Resistance in Neutron Irradiated Graphite Materials,” J. Nucl. Mater., 381(1–2), pp. 76–82. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.07.017
CD-adapco, STAR-CCM+ 8.02.008 UserGuide_8.02.008.pdf, www.cd-adapco.com.
Tak, N.-I., Kim, M.-H., and Lee, W. J., 2008, “Numerical Investigation of a Heat Transfer Within the Prismatic Fuel Assembly of a Very High Temperature Reactor,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 35(10), pp. 1892–1899. 10.1016/j.anucene.2008.04.005
Travis, B. W., and El-Genk, M. S., 2013, “Numerical Simulation and Turbulent Convection Heat Transfer Correlation for Coolant Channels in a Very-High Temperature Reactor,” Heat Transfer Eng., 34(1), pp. 1–14. 10.1080/01457632.2013.694727
Ferng, Y.M., Lin, K.Y., and Chi, C.W., 2012 “CFD Investigating Thermal-Hydraulic Characteristics of FLiNaK Salt as a Heat Exchange Fluid,” Appl. Thermal Eng., 37, pp. 235–240. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.11.021
Solidworks Corp., Solidworks2012, www.solidworks.com.
Todreas, N. E., and Kazimi, M. S., 1993, Nuclear System I-Thermal Hydraulic Fundamentals, Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York, pp. 368–375.
Shih, T. H., Liou, W.W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z., and Zhu, J., 1994. “A New k-ε Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows: Model Development and Validation,” Report No. NASA TM 106721.
Travis, B. W., and El-Genk, M. S., 2013, “Thermal-Hydraulics Analyses for 1/6 Prismatic VHTR Core and Fuel Element With and Without Bypass Flow,” Energy Convers. Manage., 67, pp. 325–341. 10.1016/j.enconman.2012.11.003
Ho, F. H., 1988, Graphite Design Handbook, General Atomics, San Diego, CA.
Williams, D. F., Toth, L. M., and Clarno, K. T., 2006, “Assessment of Candidate Molten Salt Coolants for the Advanced High-Temperature Reactor (AHTR),” ORNL/TM-2006/12, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Cantor, S., Cooke, J. W., Dworkin, A. S., Robbins, G. D., Thoma, R. E., and Watson, G. M., 1968, “Physical Properties of Molten-Salt Reactor Fuel, Coolant, and Ush Salts,” Technical Report No. ORNL-TM-2316, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Rosenthal, M. W., Briggs, R. B., and Kasten, P. R., 1968, “Molten Salt Reactor Program Semiannual Progress Report for Period Ending,” Technical Report No. ORNL-4344, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Williams, D. F., 2006, “Assessment of Candidate Molten Salt Coolants for the NGNP/NHI Heat Transfer Loop,” ORNL/TM-2006/69, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Xiao, Y., Hu, L. W., Forsberg, C., et al. , 2013, “Licensing Considerations of a Fluoride Salt Cooled High Temperature Test Reactor,” Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, ICONE21 2013, Chengdu, China, July 29–August 2, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Rea, U., McKrell, T., Hu, L.-W., and Buongiorno, J., 2009, “Laminar Convective Heat Transfer and Viscous Pressure Loss of Alumina–Water and Zirconia–Water Nanofluids,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 52(7–8), pp. 2042–2048. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.10.025
Lienhard, J. H., IV, and Lienhard, J. H., V, 2008, A Heat Transfer Textbook, 3rd ed., Phlogiston Press Cambridge, Cambridge, MA, pp. 352–353.
Hausen, H., 1943, Darstellung des Warmeuberganges in Rohren durch verallgemeinerte Potenzbeziehungen, Z. VDI Beiheft Verfahrenstechnik, 4, p. 91.
Gnielinski, V., 1976, “New Equations for Heat and Mass Transfer in Turbulent Pipe and Channel Flow,” Int. Chem. Eng., 16(2), p. 359.
Sieder, E. N., and Tate, G. E., 1936, “Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop of Liquids in Tubes,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 28(12), pp. 1429–1435. 10.1021/ie50324a027

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Temperature distribution on the top plane of the unit-cell module for (a) zero (symmetric case), (b) one, (c) two, (d) three, (e) four, (f) five, and (g) six (symmetric case) power peaks with a factor of 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Variation of maximum fuel temperature, maximum wall temperature, and bulk temperature by gradually increasing the individual heat source in a unit-cell module

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Azimuthal heat flux distribution at the interface between coolant channel and graphite matrix

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Azimuthal wall temperature distribution at the interface between coolant channel and graphite matrix

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Azimuthal HTC distribution at the interface between coolant channel and graphite matrix

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) Mesh distribution from the view A-A for Case C (laminar); (b) Mesh distribution from the view A-A for turbulent flow; (c) Mesh distribution from L1 plane for Case C; (d) Mesh distribution from L1 plane for turbulent flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Benchmark study for laminar flow in the entrance region

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

A hexagonal unit-cell module of prismatic block for FHTR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

A cross-sectional view of a FHTR prismatic fuel element

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Nonirradiated thermal conductivity as a function of temperature [5]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

TRISO particle, fuel compact, and prismatic fuel element of an HTGR [7]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Variation of maximum fuel temperature, maximum wall temperature, and bulk temperature with asymmetric heat source by keeping the overall power generation constant in a unit-cell module

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Temperature distribution on the top plane for (a) Scenario 1 (symmeric case), (b) Scenario 2, (c) Scenario 3 with IG110 graphite matrix; and (d) Scenario 1 (symmeric case), (e) Scenario 2, (f) Scenario 3 with H451 graphite matrix

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Variation of maximum fuel temperature, maximum wall temperature, and bulk temperature with three different scenarios for flibe and NaF-ZrF4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

(a) Comparison of the CFD results for flibe with Hausen, Gnielinski, Dittus-Boelter, and Sieder-Tate correlations for (a) 2300<Re<105 and (b) 2300<Re<104.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Comparison of azimuthal heat flux distibution for LiF-BeF2 and NaF-ZrF4 in laminar and turbulent flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Comparison of azimuthal wall temperature around the coolant channel for LiF-BeF2 and NaF-ZrF4 in turbulent flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Comparison of azimuthal heat transfer coefficient (HTC) around the coolant channel for LiF-BeF2 and NaF-ZrF4 in turbulent flow

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In