0
Research Papers

Analysis of Focusing Effect of Light Metallic Layer in Stratified Molten Pool Under IVR-ERVC Condition

[+] Author and Article Information
Xi Wang

State Nuclear Power Research Institute,
Building 1, Compound No. 29, North 3rd Ring Road, Xicheng District, Beijing 100029, China
e-mail: wangxi@snptc.com.cn

Xu Cheng

State Nuclear Power Research Institute,
Building 1, Compound No. 29, North 3rd Ring Road, Xicheng District, Beijing 100029, China
e-mail: chengxu@snptc.com.cn

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received March 14, 2014; final manuscript received January 11, 2015; published online March 24, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Richard R Schultz.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 1(2), 021007 (Mar 24, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: NERS-14-1001; doi: 10.1115/1.4029619 History: Received March 14, 2014; Accepted January 15, 2015; Online March 24, 2015

The main failure mechanism of in-vessel corium retention through external reactor vessel cooling (IVR-ERVC) happens when the local heat flux through reactor pressure vessel (PRV) wall exceeds the critical heat flux (CHF). High local heat flux in the molten pool is usually caused by the metallic layer focusing effect due to stratification. In this paper, depending on experimental correlations, both the lump parameter method and computational fluid dynamic method are used to investigate the mechanism of focusing effect. The concentration factor varying with the height of metallic layer is studied. The results show that the lump parameter method probably overestimates the wall heat flux of metal layer.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Theofanous, T. G., Liu, C., Additon, S., Angelini, S., Kymäläinen, O., and Salmassi, T., 1995, “In-Vessel Coolability and Retention of a Core Melt,” DOE/ID-10460, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Sehgal, B. R., Theerthan, A., Giri, A., Karbojian, A., Willschütz, H. G., Kymäläinen, O., Vandroux, S., Bonnet, J. M., Seiler, J. M., Ikkonen, K., Sairanen, R., Bhandari, S., Bürger, M., Buck, M., Widmann, W., Dienstbier, J., Techy, Z., Kostka, P., Taubner, R., Theofanous, T., and Dinh, T. N., 2003, “Assessment of Reactor Vessel Integrity (ARVI),” Nucl. Eng. Design, 221(1–3), pp. 23–53. 10.1016/S0029-5493(02)00343-6
Globe, S., and Dropkin, D., 1959, “Natural Convection Heat Transfer in Liquids Confined by Two Horizontal Plates and Heated From Below,” J. Heat Transfer, 81, pp. 24–28.
Churchill, S. W., and Chu, H. H. S., 1975, “Correlating Equations for Laminar and Turbulent Free Convection from a Vertical Plate,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 18(11), pp. 1323–1329. 10.1016/0017-9310(75)90243-4
Liu, C., and Theofanous, T. G., 1995, “The MELAD Experiment,” University of California, Santa Barbara.
Bonnet, J. M., and Villermaux, C., 2001, “BALI-Metal Test Reports: Focusing Effect Investigations,” SAM-ARVI-D2.1.2. OECD/CSNI Workshop on In-Vessel Core Debris Retention and Coolability, Garching, Germany
Sehgal, B. R., 2006, “Stabilization and Termination of Severe Accidents in LWRs,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 236(19–21), pp. 1941–1952. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.03.040
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2004, “Analysis of In-Vessel Retention and Ex-Vessel Fuel Coolant Interaction for AP1000,” , Energy Research, Inc., Washington, DC.
Spalart, P. R., and Allmaras, S. R., 1992, “A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows,” 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, .

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Energy though metallic layer in stratified molten pool

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Ratio of upward heat flux and bottom heat flux varying with the height radius ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Temperature varying with the ratio of height to radius (qb=2.0  MW/m2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Temperature varying with the ratio of height to radius (qb=1.0  MW/m2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Temperature varying with the ratio of height to radius (qb=0.5  MW/m2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Concentration factor varying with height to radius ratio at different boundary conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Test section of MELAD experiment design [5]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Temperature field and velocity field of MELAD experiment simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Upward Nusselt number varying with Rayleigh number in metallic layer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Sideward Nusselt number varying with Rayleigh number in metallic layer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Temperature and velocity field of metallic layer (H/R=0.3,0.2,0.1, R=2.5  m)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Heat flux shape at upper surface along the cross section of metallic layer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Concentration factor varying with ratio of height and radius, R=2.5  m

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In