Research Papers

A Control-Oriented Modeling Approach to Spatial Neutronics Simulation of a Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor

[+] Author and Article Information
S. Lorenzi

Politecnico di Milano,
Department of Energy,
via la Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy
e-mail: stefano.lorenzi@polimi.it

A. Cammi

Politecnico di Milano,
Department of Energy,
via la Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy
e-mail: antonio.cammi@polimi.it

L. Luzzi

Politecnico di Milano,
Department of Energy,
via la Masa 34, 20156, Milano, Italy
e-mail: lelio.luzzi@polimi.it

R. Ponciroli

Politecnico di Milano,
Department of Energy,
via la Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy
e-mail: roberto.ponciroli@polimi.it

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received October 14, 2014; final manuscript received January 28, 2015; published online May 20, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Emmanuel Porcheron.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 1(3), 031007 (May 20, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: NERS-14-1050; doi: 10.1115/1.4029791 History: Received October 14, 2014; Accepted February 10, 2015; Online May 20, 2015

The most diffused neutronics modeling approach in control-oriented simulators is pointwise kinetics. In the framework of developing control strategies for innovative reactor concepts, such a simplified description is less effective as it prevents the possibility of exploiting the capabilities of advanced control schemes. In the present work, in order to overcome these limitations, a spatial neutronics description based on the modal method has been considered. This method allows separating the spatial and time dependence of the neutron flux, which can be represented as the sum of the eigenfunctions of the neutron diffusion equation weighted by time-dependent coefficients. In this way, the system dynamic behavior is reduced to the study of these coefficients and can be represented by a set of ordinary differential equations (ODEs), reducing the simulation computational burden. In this paper, a test case involving three fuel pins of an innovative lead-cooled fast reactor has been set up and investigated. Once the eigenfunctions are obtained, the set of ODEs for studying the time-dependent coefficients has been derived and then implemented in the DYMOLA environment, developing an object-oriented component based on the reliable, tested, and well-documented Modelica language. In addition, a heat transfer model for the fuel pin has been developed, still drawing on the principles of the object-oriented modeling. Finally, in order to assess the performance of the developed spatial neutronics component, the outcomes have been compared with the reference results obtained from the multigroup diffusion partial differential equations, achieving a satisfactory agreement.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


IAEA, 1999, “Modern Instrumentation and Control for Nuclear Power Plants: A Guidebook,” , International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
IAEA, 2009, “Implementing Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems in the Modernization of Nuclear Power Plants,” , International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
GIF, 2002, “A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy System,” US DOE Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee and the Generation IV International Forum, .
Fritzson, P., 2004, Principles of Object-Oriented Modeling and Simulation with Modelica 2.1, Wiley-IEEE Press, New York, NY.
Modelica, 2011, http://www.modelica.org.
Fritzson, P., 2011, “A Cyber-Physical Modeling Language and the OpenModelica Environment,” Proceedings of the International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, Turkey, July 4–8, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1648–1653.
Cammi, A., Casella, F., Ricotti, M. E., and Schiavo, F., 2005, “Object-Oriented Modelling, Simulation and Control of IRIS Nuclear Power Plant with Modelica,” Proceedings of the 4th International Modelica Conference, Hamburg, Germany, Mar. 7–8, The Modelica Association and the Department of Thermodynamics, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany, pp. 423–432.
Souyri, A., Bouskela, D., Pentori, B., and Kerkar, N., 2006, “Pressurized Water Reactor Modelling with Modelica,” Proceedings of the 5th International Modelica Conference, Vienna, Austria, Sept. 4–5, The Modelica Association and the Arsenal Research, Vienna, Austria, pp. 127–133.
Ponciroli, R., Bigoni, A., Cammi, A., Lorenzi, S., and Luzzi, L., 2014, “Object-Oriented Modelling and Simulation for the ALFRED Dynamics,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 71, pp. 15–29. 10.1016/j.pnucene.2013.10.013
Schultz, M. A., 1961, Control of Nuclear Reactors and Power Plants, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hetrick, D. L., 1993, Dynamics of Nuclear Reactors, American Nuclear Society, Inc., La Grange Park, IL.
Stacey, W. M., 1969, Space-Time Nuclear Reactor Kinetics, Academic Press, Waltham, MA.
Dulla, S., Picca, P., and Ravetto, P., 2009, “Variational Methods in the Kinetic Modeling of Nuclear Reactors: Recent Advances,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics, Computational Methods and Reactor Physics, Saratoga Springs, NY, May 3–7, American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, IL.
Xia, L., Jiang, J., Javidnia, H., and Luxat, J. C., 2012, “Performance Evaluation of a 3-D Kinetic Model for CANDU Reactors in a Closed-Loop Environment,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 243, pp. 76–86. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.11.034
Sartori, A., Baroli, D., Cammi, A., Chiesa, D., Luzzi, L., Ponciroli, R., Previtali, E., Ricotti, M. E., Rozza, G., and Sisti, M., 2013, “Comparison of a Modal Method and a Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Approach for Multi-Group Time-Dependent Reactor Spatial Kinetics,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 71, pp. 217–229. 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.03.043
Alemberti, A., Frogheri, M., and Mansani, L., 2013, “The Lead Fast Reactor Demonstrator (ALFRED) and ELFR Design,” Proceedings of the IAEA International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Safe Technologies and Sustainable Scenarios, Paris, France, Mar. 4–7, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, Paper No. IAEA-CN-199/437.
Grasso, G., Petrovich, C., Mattioli, D., Artioli, C., Sciora, P., Gugiu, D., Bandini, G., Bubelis, E., and Mikityuk, K., 2014, “The Core Design of ALFRED, a Demonstrator for the European Lead-Cooled Reactors,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 278, pp. 287–301. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.07.032
Duderstadt, J. J., and Hamilton, L. J., 1976, Nuclear Reactor Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Henry, A. F., 1975, Nuclear Reactor Analysis, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
COMSOL, 2011, “COMSOL Multiphysics® 4.2a, User’s Guide,” COMSOL Inc., Stockholm, Sweden.
SERPENT, 2011, “PSG2/Serpent Monte Carlo Reactor Physics Burnup Calculation Code,” http://montecarlo.vtt.fi.
Aufiero, M., Cammi, A., Fiorina, C., Luzzi, L., and Sartori, A., 2013, “A Multiphysics Time-Dependent Model for the Lead Fast Reactor Single-Channel Analysis,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 256, pp. 14–27. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.11.019
Lorenzi, S., Cammi, A., Luzzi, L., and Ponciroli P., 2014, “Development of a Spatial Neutronics Model for Control-Oriented Dynamics Simulation,” Proceedings of the International Conference On Nuclear Engineering, Prague, Czech Republic, July 7–11, Paper No. 30818.
Elmqvist, H., Cellier, F. E., and Otter, M., 1993, “Object-Oriented Modeling of Hybrid Systems,” Proceedings of the European Simulation Symposium (ESS’93), Delft, Netherlands, Oct. 25–28, SCS Publisher, La Jolla, CA, pp. 31–41.
Casella, F., and Leva, A., 2006, “Modeling of Thermo-Hydraulic Power Generation Processes Using Modelica,” Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Sys., 12(1), pp. 19–33. 10.1080/13873950500071082
Todreas, N. E, and Kazimi, M. S., 2012, Nuclear Systems, Thermal Hydraulic Fundamentals, Vol. 1, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.
Luzzi, L., Cammi, A., Di Marcello, V., Lorenzi, S., Pizzocri, D., and Van Uffelen, P., 2014, “Application of the TRANSURANUS Code for the Fuel Pin Design Process of the ALFRED Reactor,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 277, pp. 173–187. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.06.032


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

ALFRED subchannel adopted as a case study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Axial and radial discretization of the fuel pin

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Object-oriented model of the test case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Pin power variation following a reactivity insertion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Fuel and lead temperature variation following a reactivity insertion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Reactivity variation following a reactivity insertion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) First nine neutronics spatial modes (normalized flux); (b) computational mesh

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Pin power variation following a lead inlet temperature enhancement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Fuel and lead temperature variations following a lead inlet temperature enhancement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Reactivity variation following a lead inlet temperature enhancement




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In