0
Research Papers

Sensitivity Studies of Shear Stress Transport Turbulence Model Parameters on the Prediction of Seven-Rod Bundle Benchmark Experiments

[+] Author and Article Information
Cale Bergmann

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Manitoba,
75A Chancellors Circle, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada
e-mail: umbergm5@myumanitoba.ca

S. Ormiston

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Manitoba,
75A Chancellors Circle, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada
e-mail: scott.ormiston@umanitoba.ca

V. Chatoorgoon

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Manitoba,
75A Chancellors Circle, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada
e-mail: vijay.chatoorgoon@umanitoba.ca

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received April 10, 2015; final manuscript received July 2, 2015; published online December 9, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Thomas Schulenberg.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 2(1), 011012 (Dec 09, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: NERS-15-1053; doi: 10.1115/1.4031035 History: Received April 10, 2015; Accepted July 07, 2015

This paper reports the findings of a sensitivity study of parameters in the shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model in a commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code to predict an experiment from the Generation IV International Forum Supercritical-Water-Cooled Reactor (GIF SCWR) 2013–2014 seven-rod subchannel benchmark exercise. This study was motivated by the result of the benchmark exercise that all the CFD codes gave similar results to a subchannel code, which does not possess any sophisticated turbulence modeling. Initial findings were that the CFD codes generally underpredicted the wall temperatures on the B2 case in the region where the flow was supercritical. Therefore, it was decided to examine the effect of various turbulence model parameters to determine if a CFD code using the SST turbulence model could do a better job overall in predicting the wall temperatures of the benchmark experiments. A sensitivity study of seven parameters was done, and changes to two parameters were found to make an improvement.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

ANSYS® Academic Research, Release 14.5, Help System, CFX-Solver Theory Manual, ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
Menter, F. R., 1994, “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA J., 32(8), pp. 1598–1605. 0001-1452 10.2514/3.12149
Launder, B. E., and Sharma, B. I., 1974, “Application of the Energy-Dissipation Model of Turbulence to the Calculation of Flow Near a Spinning Disc,” Lett. Heat Mass Transfer, 1(2), pp. 131–137. 0094-4548 10.1016/0094-4548(74)90150-7
Wilcox, D. C., 1988, “Reassessment of the Scale-Determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models,” AIAA J., 26(11), pp. 1299–1310. 0001-1452 10.2514/3.10041
Wagner, W., Cooper, J. R., Dittmann, A., Kijima, J., Kretzschmar, H. J., Kruse, A., Mareš, R., Oguchi, K., Sato, H., Stöcker, I., Šifner, O., Takaishi, Y., Tanishita, I., Trübenbach, J., and Willkommen, T., 2000, “The IAPWS Industrial Formulation 1997 for the Thermodynamic Properties of Water and Steam,” J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, Trans. ASME, 122(1), pp. 150–182. [CrossRef]
Jones, W. P., and Launder, B. E., 1972, “The Prediction of Laminarization With a Two-Equation Model of Turbulence,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 15(2), pp. 301–314. 0017-9310 10.1016/0017-9310(72)90076-2
Townsend, A. A., 1976, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Launder, B., and Sandham, N., 2002, Closure Strategies for Turbulent and Transition Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Kays, W. M., 1994, “Turbulent Prandtl Number—Where Are We?” J. Heat Transfer, 116(2), pp. 284–295. 0022-1481 10.1115/1.2911398
Shitsman, M. E., 1963, “Impairment of the Heat Transmission at Supercritical Pressures,” High Temp., 1(2), pp. 237–244. 0018-151X
Ornatskii, A., Glushchenko, L., and Kalachev, S., 1971, “Heat-Transfer With Rising and Falling Flows of Water in Tubes of Small Diameter at Supercritical Pressures,” Therm. Eng., 18(5), pp. 137–141. 0040-6015

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Cross section of seven-rod bundle, showing domain that was modeled in this study, along with the planes of symmetry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic y–z cross section of the domain, showing inlet, heated section, outlet, location of all six spacers relative to the inlet, and location of the pressure taps. All spacers are of the same length. Dimensions are in mm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Typical x–y cross section showing fluid and solid domains and locations of thermocouples: lines a, b, c, d, and e. All dimensions in mm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Equivalent r–θ coordinate system for describing mesh modification procedure shown on typical x–y cross section of BNSP-6 mesh

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Total pressure drop percentage difference between each mesh and BNSP-1 mesh versus total nodes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Cladding surface temperature RMSRN,T versus total nodes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Blind modeling results of cladding surface temperature, compared to case B2 experimental data. Default values for SST coefficients were used.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

y–z cross section at location of spacer showing reduction in grid spacing in z-direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Blind modeling results of cladding surface temperature with spacers modeled, compared to case B2 experimental data. Default values for SST coefficients were used.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Cladding surface temperature from using optimized SST coefficient values, compared to results from using default SST coefficient values and case B2 experimental data

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In