0
Research Papers

Numerical Analysis to Investigate the Effects of Thermal-Hydraulic Instabilities on Deterioration Heat Transfer and Wall Temperature in the CANDU Supercritical Water Reactor

[+] Author and Article Information
Goutam Dutta

Electrical and Computer Engineering,
University of Western Ontario (UWO),
London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
e-mail: gd@iiitdmj.ac.in, gdutta@uwo.ca

Chao Zhang

Mem. ASMEMechanical and Materials Engineering,
University of Western Ontario (UWO),
London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
e-mail: czhang@eng.uwo.ca

Jin Jiang

Electrical and Computer Engineering,
University of Western Ontario (UWO),
London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
e-mail: jjiang@eng.uwo.ca

1Corresponding author.

2Visitor from the Discipline of Mechanical Engineering, PDPM Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design and Manufacturing Jabalpur, http://www.iiitdmj.ac.in/index.html.

Manuscript received December 20, 2014; final manuscript received March 17, 2015; published online September 3, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Thomas Schulenberg.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 1(4), 041011 (Sep 03, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: NERS-14-1065; doi: 10.1115/1.4030199 History: Received December 20, 2014; Accepted March 25, 2015; Online September 16, 2015

The present work analyzes the thermal-hydraulic behavior of the CANDU supercritical water reactor (SCWR) using a 1-D numerical model. The possibility of a static instability, the Ledinegg excursion, is investigated, which reveals it can occur only in a hypothetical condition, far from the proposed operating regime of the CANDU SCWR. The investigation demonstrates the possibility of density wave oscillations (DWOs), a dynamic instability, in the operating regime of the CANDU SCWR and its marginal stability boundary (MSB) is obtained. The phenomenon of the deterioration in heat transfer is observed, and the related investigation shows that the strong buoyancy effect is responsible for its appearance inside the heating section of the channel of the CANDU SCWR core. The MSB is found to be inadequate in determining the safe operating zone of the reactor because the wall temperature can exceed the allowable limit from metallurgical consideration. The investigations also determine the safe as well as stable zone where the CANDU SCWR should operate in order to avoid the maximum temperature limit and DWOs.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Swenson, H., Carver, J., and Kakarala, C., 1965, “Heat Transfer to Supercritical Water in Smooth-Bore Tubes,” J. Heat Transfer Trans. ASME Ser., c87(4), pp. 477–484. [CrossRef]
Yamagata, K., Nishikawa, K., Hasegawa, S., Fuji, T., and Yoshida, S., 1972, “Forced Convective Heat Transfer to Supercritical Water Flowing in Tubes,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 15(12), pp. 2575–2593. [CrossRef]
Jackson, J., 2002, “Consideration of the Heat Transfer Properties of Supercritical Pressure Water in Connection With the Cooling of Advanced Nuclear Reactors,” Proceedings of the 13th Pacific basin Nuclear Conference, Shenzhen City, China, pp. 21–25.
Pioro, I. L., Khartabil, H. F., and Duffey, R. B., 2004, “Heat Transfer to Supercritical Fluids Flowing in Channels, Empirical Correlations (Survey),” Nucl. Eng. Des., 230(1–3), pp. 69–91. [CrossRef]
Duffey, R. B., and Pioro, I. L., 2005, “Experimental Heat Transfer of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Flowing Inside Channels (Survey),” Nucl. Eng. Des., 235(8), pp. 913–924. [CrossRef]
Jäger, W., Sánchez Espinoza, V. H., and Hurtado, A., 2011, “Review and Proposal for Heat Transfer Predictions at Supercritical Water Conditions Using Existing Correlations and Experiments,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 241(6), pp. 2184–2203. [CrossRef]
Mikielewicz, D. P., Shehata, A. M., Jackson, J. D., and McEligot, D. M., 2002, “Temperature, Velocity and Mean Turbulence Structure in Strongly Heated Internal Gas Flows Comparison of Numerical Predictions With Data,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 45(21), pp. 4333–4352. [CrossRef]
Jiang, P.-X., Liu, B., Zhao, C.-R., and Luo, F., 2013, “Convection Heat Transfer of Supercritical Pressure Carbon Dioxide in a Vertical Micro Tube From Transition to Turbulent Flow Regime,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 56(1–2), pp. 741–749. [CrossRef]
Chatoorgoon, V., 2001, “Stability of Supercritical Fluid Flow in a Single-Channel Natural-Convection Loop,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 44(10), pp. 1963–1972. [CrossRef]
Chatoorgoon, V., Voodi, A., and Fraser, D., 2005, “The Stability Boundary for Supercritical Flow in Natural Convection Loops Part I: H 2 O Studies,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 235(24), pp. 2570–2580. [CrossRef]
Gómez, T. O., Class, A., Lahey, R. T., and Schulenberg, T., 2008, “Stability Analysis of a Uniformly Heated Channel With Supercritical Water,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 238(8), pp. 1930–1939. [CrossRef]
Jain, P. K., and Rizwan-uddin, 2008, “Numerical Analysis of Supercritical Flow Instabilities in a Natural Circulation Loop,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 238(8), pp. 1947–1957. [CrossRef]
Ambrosini, W., 2009, “Discussion on the Stability of Heated Channels With Different Fluids at Supercritical Pressures,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 239(12), pp. 2952–2963. [CrossRef]
Zhao, J., Tso, C. P., and Tseng, K. J., 2011, “SCWR Single Channel Stability Analysis Using a Response Matrix Method,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 241(7), pp. 2528–2535. [CrossRef]
T’Joen, C., Gilli, L., and Rohde, M., 2011, “Sensitivity Analysis of Numerically Determined Linear Stability Boundaries of a Supercritical Heated Channel,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 241(9), pp. 3879–3889.
Ambrosini, W., 2011, “Assessment of Flow Stability Boundaries in a Heated Channel With Different Fluids at Supercritical Pressure,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 38(2–3), pp. 615–627. [CrossRef]
Mokry, S., Pioro, I., Farah, A., King, K., Gupta, S., Peiman, W., and Kirillov, P., 2011, “Development of Supercritical Water Heat-Transfer Correlation for Vertical Bare Tubes,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 241(4), pp. 1126–1136. [CrossRef]
Zhou, Q., 1983, “Influences of Buoyancy on Heat Transfer to Supercritical Pressure Water in Vertical Tubes,” J. Eng. Thermophys., 4(2), pp. 165–172.
Polyakov, A., 1991, “Heat Transfer Under Supercritical Pressures,” Adv. Heat Transfer, 21, pp. 1–53.
Tanaka, H., Tsuge, A., Hirata, M., and Nishiwaki, N., 1973, “Effects of Buoyancy and of Acceleration Owing to Thermal Expansion on Forced Turbulent Convection in Vertical Circular Tubes Criteria of the Effects, Velocity and Temperature Profiles, and Reverse Transition From Turbulent to Laminar Flow,” J. Heat Mass Transfer, 16(6), pp. 1267–1288. [CrossRef]
Dutta, G., Maitri, R., Zhang, C., and Jiang, J., “Numerical Models to Predict Steady and Unsteady Themal-Hydraulic Behaviour of Supercritical Water Flow in Circular Tubes,” Nucl. Eng. Des., under review.
Dutta, G., Zhang, C., and Jiang, J., 2015, “Numerical Analysis of Flow Induced Density Wave Oscillations in CANDU Supercritical Water Reactor,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 286, pp. 150–162 [CrossRef]
Ambrosini, W., and Sharabi, M., 2008, “Dimensionless Parameters in Stability Analysis of Heated Channels With Fluids at Supercritical Pressures,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 238(8), pp. 1917–1929. [CrossRef]
Leung, L., 2013, “Canada’s Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactor Concept,” Information Exchange Meeting Phase-II NSERC/NRCan/AECL Gen-IV Energy Technologies Program, Toronto, Canada.
Chatoorgoon, V., 2013, “Non-Dimensional Parameters for Static Instability in Supercritical Heated Channels,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 64, pp. 145–154.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Constructional features of the CANDU SCWR. (a) Schematic diagram [24] and (b) schematic diagram of the pressure tube

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Pressure drop versus mass flow rate at various steady-state operating conditions. (a) hin=50  kJ/kg, (b) hin=500  kJ/kg, (c) hin=1500  kJ/kg, and (d) hypothetical operating condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

MSB of the CANDU SCWR at W=924  kg/s (70% of rated flow rate) and pex=25  MPa

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Temporal variation of axial wall temperature at W=924  kg/s (70% of rated flow rate), hin=1000  kJ/kg, Q=2226.5  MW (89% of rated power), and pex=25  MPa

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Axial variation of various buoyancy parameters and pressure gradients at t=0  s. (a) T(z), (b) B*(z) and A*(z), (c) Bu*(z) and k*(z), (d) TR(z), and (e) pressure gradients

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Axial variation of various buoyancy parameters and pressure gradients at t=20.95  s. (a) T(z), (b) B*(z) and A*(z), (c) Bu*(z) and k*(z), (d) TR(z), and (e) pressure gradients

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Axial variation of various buoyancy parameters and pressure gradients at t=26.32  s. (a) T(z), (b) B*(z) and A*(z), (c) Bu*(z) and k*(z), (d) TR(z), and (e) pressure gradients

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Axial wall temperature at various operating conditions. (a) Tw determined by HTCM and (b) Tw determined by HTCS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Safe and stable operating zone at W=924  kg/s (70% of rated flow rate) and pex=25  MPa

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Temporal variation of axial wall temperature at W=924  kg/s (70% of rated flow rate), hin=1400  kJ/kg, Q=1918.6  MW (77% of rated power), and pex=25  MPa

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In