0
Research Papers

Influence of Changes in Pressure and Temperature of Supercritical Water on the Susceptibility to Stress Corrosion Cracking of 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel

[+] Author and Article Information
Alberto Sáez-Maderuelo

Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT),
Avda. Complutense, 40,
Madrid, Spain
e-mail: alberto.saez@ciemat.es

Dolores Gómez-Briceño

Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT),
Avda. Complutense, 40,
Madrid, Spain
e-mail: lola.gomezbriceno@ciemat.es

César Maffiotte

Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT),
Avda. Complutense, 40,
Madrid, Spain
e-mail: cesar.maffiotte@ciemat.es

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received May 29, 2015; final manuscript received January 15, 2016; published online December 20, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Thomas Schulenberg.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 3(1), 011009 (Dec 20, 2016) (6 pages) Paper No: NERS-15-1100; doi: 10.1115/1.4032780 History: Received May 29, 2015; Accepted January 27, 2016

The supercritical water reactor (SCWR) is one of the Generation IV designs. The SCWR is characterized by its high efficiency, low waste production, and simple design. Despite the suitable properties of supercritical water as a coolant, its physicochemical properties change sharply with pressure and temperature in the supercritical region. For this reason, there are many doubts about how changes in these variables affect the behavior of the materials to general corrosion or to specific types of corrosion such as stress corrosion cracking (SCC). Austenitic stainless steels are candidate materials to build the SCWR due to their optimum behavior in the light water reactors (LWRs). Nevertheless, their behavior under the SCWR conditions is not well known. First, the objective of this work was to study the SCC behavior of austenitic stainless steel 316 type L in deaerated supercritical water at 400°C/25  MPa and 30 MPa and 500°C/25  MPa to determine how variations in pressure and temperature influence its behavior with regard to SCC and to make progress in the understanding of mechanisms involved in SCC processes in this environment. Second, the oxide layer formed at 400°C/30  MPa/<10  ppbO2 was analyzed to gain some insight into these processes.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Pioro, I., and Mokry, S., 2011, “Thermophysical Properties at Critical and Supercritical Conditions,” Heat Transfer-Theoretical Analysis, Experimental Investigations and Industrial Systems, A. Belmiloudi, ed., InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp. 573–592.
Kritzer, P., 2004, “Corrosion in High-Temperature and Supercritical Water and Aqueous Solutions: A Review,” J. Supercrit. Fluids, 29(1–2), pp. 1–29. 10.1016/S0896-8446(03)00031-7
Imre, A. R., Deiters, U. K., Kraska, T., and Tiselj, I., 2012, “The Pseudocritical Regions for Supercritical Water,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 252, pp. 179–183. 0029-5493 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.07.007
Guzonas, D. A., and Cook, W. G., 2012, “Cycle Chemistry and Its Effect on Materials in a Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactor: A Synthesis of Current Understanding,” Corros. Sci., 65, pp. 48–66. 0010-938X 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.08.006
Macdonald, D. D., and Guan, X., 2007, “Volume of Activation for the Corrosion of UNS 304000 in High Subcritical and Supercritical Aqueous Systems,” NACE, Paper No. 07407.
Couvant, T., 2007, “Investigations on the Mechanisms of PWSCC of Strain Hardened Austenitic Stainless Steels,” Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Environmental Degradation on Materials in Nuclear Power System Water Reactors, British Columbia.
Wachter, O., and Brüemmer, G., 1997, “Experiences With Austenitic Steels in Boiling Water Reactors,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 168(1–3), pp. 35–52. 0029-5493 10.1016/S0029-5493(96)01308-8
Guzonas, D., and Novotny, R., 2014, “Supercritical Water Cooled Reactor Materials-Summary of Research and Open Issues,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 77, pp. 361–372. 0149-1970 10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.02.008
Novotny, R., Hahner, P., Siegl, J., Haušild, P., Ripplinger, S., Penttilä, S., and Toivonen, A., 2011, “Stress Corrosion Cracking Susceptibility of Austenitic Stainless Steels in Supercritical Water Conditions,” J. Nucl. Mater., 409(2), pp. 117–123. 0022-3115 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.09.018
Was, G. S., Ampornrat, P., Gupta, G., Teysseyre, S., West, E. A., Allen, T. R., Sridharan, K., Tan, L., Chen, Y., Ren, X., and Pister, C., 2007, “Corrosion and Stress Corrosion Cracking in Supercritical Water,” J. Nucl. Mater., 371(1–3), pp. 176–201. 0022-3115 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.017
Muthukumar, N., Lee, J. H., and Kimura, A., 2011, “SCC Behavior of Austenitic and Martensitic Steels in Supercritical Pressurized Water,” J. Nucl. Mater., 417(1–3), pp. 1221–1224. 0022-3115 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.02.033
Teysseyre, S., and Was, G. S., 2006, “Stress Corrosion Cracking of Austenitic Alloys in Supercritical Water,” Corrosion, 62(12), pp. 1100–1116. 10.5006/1.3278244
Rodriguez, D., Merwin, A., and Chidambaram, D., 2014, “On the Oxidation of Stainless Steel Alloy 304 in Subcritical and Supercritical Water,” J. Nucl. Mater., 452(1–3), pp. 440–445. 0022-3115 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.05.049
Was, G. S., Teysseyre, S., and Jiao, Z., 2006, “Corrosion of Austenitic Alloys in Supercrititical Water,” Corrosion, 62(11), pp. 989–1005. 10.5006/1.3278237
Guzonas, D., “Water Chemistry in a Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactor,” J. Supercrit. Fluids (accepted).
Gómez-Briceño, D., Blázquez, F., and Sáez-Maderuelo, A., 2013, “Oxidation of Austenitic and Ferritic/Martensitic Alloys in Supercritical Water,” J. Supercrit. Fluids, 78, pp. 103–113. 10.1016/j.supflu.2013.03.014
ASM International, ASM Handbook Corrosion, Vol. 13B, ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
Sáez-Maderuelo, A., 2014, “Comportamiento de Aleaciones Austeníticas en Condiciones de un Reactor Nuclear Avanzado Refrigerado por Agua Supercrítica,” Ph.D. thesis, Rey Juan Carlos University, https://eciencia.urjc.es/handle/10115/12945.
Ehrnsten, U., Ivanchenki, M., Nevdacha, V., Yagodzinskyy, Y., Toivonen, A., and Hänninen, H., 2005, “Dynamic Strain Ageing and EAC of Deformed Nitrogen-Alloyed AISI 316 Stainless Steel,” Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power System-Water Reactors, Salt Lake City, UT.
Solomon, H. D., 1984, “Transgranular, Granulated, and Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking in AISI 304 SS,” Corrosion, 40(9), pp. 493–505. 10.5006/1.3577922
Kalinichev, A. G., and Churakov, S. V., 1999, “Size and Topology of Molecular Clusters in Supercritical Water: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 302, pp. 411–417. 0009-2614 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00174-8
Sáez-Maderuelo, A., and Gómez-Briceño, D., “Study of the Oxidation Behavior of Alloy 690 in Liquid Water, Steam and Supercritical Water,” Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, Ottawa, Canada.
Jin, W., Yang, S., Kokawa, H., Wang, Z., and Sato, Y., 2007, “Improvement of Intergranular Stress Corrosion Crack Susceptibility of Austenite Stainless Steel through Grain Boundary Engineering,” J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 23(6), pp. 785–789. 1005-0302

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Geometry of the samples tested in SCW. (a) Samples used in the stress corrosion tests. (b) Samples used in the oxidation tests

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Stress–strain curves obtained after CERT tests in SCW at different pressures and temperatures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Stress–strain curves for specimens strained in supercritical water up to failure at 400°C and 500°C/25  MPa/<10  ppb O2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Fracture surface of the specimen tested in supercritical water at 500°C/25  MPa/<10  ppb O2, granulated crack is highlighted. (b) The granulated crack at higher magnifications. (c) Fracture surface of the specimen tested in supercritical water at 400°C/25  MPa/<10  ppb O2. (d) An example of a crack found in the surface of a specimen tested in supercritical water (400°C/30  MPa/<10  ppb O2).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison between the microstructure obtained by EBSD before the test and the same surface after the test in supercritical water at 500°C/25  MPa/<10  ppb O2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) Weight gains as a function of exposure time for the alloy 316L at 400°C/30  MPa with 8 ppm O2 and at 400°C/30  MPa in deaerated supercritical water. (b) SEM image of the surface of the specimen tested in supercritical water at 400°C/30  MPa/<10  ppb O2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Elemental composition profiles of oxide layers formed on the alloy 316L at (a) 400°C/30  MPa/<10  ppb O2 (528 hrs) and at (b) 400°C/30  MPa/8  ppm O2 (760 hrs)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In