0
Research Papers

Effect of Surface Oxidation on the Onset of Nucleate Boiling in a Materials Test Reactor Coolant Channel

[+] Author and Article Information
Eric C. Forrest

Primary Standards Laboratory,
Sandia National Laboratories,
Albuquerque, NM 87185
e-mail: ecforre@sandia.gov

Sarah M. Don

Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA 02139
e-mail: sarahdon@alum.mit.edu

Lin-Wen Hu

Mem. ASME
Nuclear Reactor Laboratory,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA 02139
e-mail: lwhu@mit.edu

Jacopo Buongiorno

Mem. ASME
Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA 02139
e-mail: jacopo@mit.edu

Thomas J. McKrell

Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA 02139
e-mail: tmckrell@mit.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received July 10, 2015; final manuscript received August 18, 2015; published online February 29, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Igor Pioro.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 2(2), 021001 (Feb 29, 2016) (13 pages) Paper No: NERS-15-1159; doi: 10.1115/1.4031503 History: Received July 10, 2015; Accepted August 29, 2015

The onset of nucleate boiling (ONB) serves as the thermal-hydraulic operating limit for many research and test reactors. However, boiling incipience under forced convection has not been well-characterized in narrow channel geometries or for oxidized surface conditions. This study presents experimental data for the ONB in vertical upflow of deionized (DI) water in a simulated materials test reactor (MTR) coolant channel. The channel gap thickness and aspect ratio were 1.96 mm and 291, respectively. Boiling surface conditions were carefully controlled and characterized, with both heavily oxidized and native oxide surfaces tested. Measurements were performed for mass fluxes ranging from 750 to 3000  kg/m2s and for subcoolings ranging from 10 to 45°C. ONB was identified using a combination of high-speed visual observation, surface temperature measurements, and channel pressure drop measurements. Surface temperature measurements were found to be most reliable in identifying the ONB. For the nominal (native oxide) surface, results indicate that the correlation of Bergles and Rohsenow, when paired with the appropriate single-phase heat transfer correlation, adequately predicts the ONB heat flux. Incipience on the oxidized surface occurred at a higher heat flux and superheat than on the plain surface.

Sandia National Laboratories (SNL)
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

MITR Staff, 2011, “Safety Analysis Report for the MIT Research Reactor,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Report No. MIT-NRL-11-02.
Bergles, A. E., and Rohsenow, W. M., 1964, “The Determination of Forced-Convection Surface-Boiling Heat Transfer,” J. Heat Transfer, 86(3), pp. 365–372. 0022-1481 10.1115/1.3688697
McAdams, W. H., 1942, Heat Transmission, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, pp. 167–168.
Bankoff, S. G., 1958, “Entrapment of a Gas in the Spreading of a Liquid Over a Rough Surface,” AI ChE J., 4(1), pp. 24–26. 0569-3845 10.1002/(ISSN)1547-5905
Jones, S. F., Evans, G. M., and Galvin, K. P., 1999, “Bubble Nucleation From Gas Cavities—A Review,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 80(1), pp. 27–50. 0001-8686 10.1016/S0001-8686(98)00074-8
Eddington, R. I., and Kenning, D. B. R., 1979, “The Effect of Contact Angle on Bubble Nucleation,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 22(8), pp. 1231–1236. 0017-9310 10.1016/0017-9310(79)90169-8
Tong, W., Bar-Cohen, A., Simon, T. W., and You, S. M., 1990, “Contact Angle Effects on Boiling Incipience in Highly-Wetting Liquids,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 33(1), pp. 91–103. 0017-9310 10.1016/0017-9310(90)90144-J
Pioro, I. L., Rohsenow, W., and Doerffer, S. S., 2004, “Nucleate Pool-Boiling Heat Transfer. I: Review of Parametric Effects on Boiling Surface,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 47(23), pp. 5033–5044. 0017-9310 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.06.019
Carey, V. P., 2008, Liquid-Vapor Phase-Change Phenomena, 2nd ed., Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, New York, NY, pp. 164–172.
Hsu, Y. Y., and Graham, W., 1961, “An Analytical and Experimental Study of the Thermal Boundary Layer and Ebullition Cycle in Nucleate Boiling,” NASA, Technical Note No. D-594.
Hsu, Y. Y., 1962, “On the Size Range of Active Nucleation Cavities on a Heating Surface,” J. Heat Transfer, 84(3), pp. 207–216. 0022-1481 10.1115/1.3684339
Satō, T., and Matsumura, H., 1964, “On the Conditions of Incipient Subcooled-Boiling With Forced Convection,” Bull. J. Soc. Mech. Eng., 7(26), pp. 329–338. 10.1299/jsme1958.7.329
Davis, E. J., and Anderson, G. H., 1966, “The Incipience of Nucleate Boiling in Forced Convection Flow,” AIChE J., 12(4), pp. 774–780. 0569-3845 10.1002/(ISSN)1547-5905
Kandlikar, S. G., 2006, Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow in Minichannels and Microchannels, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 175–181.
Kandlikar, S. G., Mizo, V., Cartwright, M., and Ikenze, E., 1997, “Bubble Nucleation and Growth Characteristics in Subcooled Flow Boiling of Water,” ASME Proceedings of the 32nd National Heat Transfer Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Vol. 4, pp. 11–18.
Sudo, Y., Miyata, K., Ikawa, H., and Kaminaga, M., 1986, “Experimental Study of Incipient Nucleate Boiling in Narrow Vertical Rectangular Channel Simulating Subchannel of Upgraded JRR-3,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 23(1), pp. 73–82. 0022-3131 10.1080/18811248.1986.9734950
Hong, G., Yan, X., Yang, Y. H., Liu, S., and Huang, Y. P., 2012, “Experimental Study of Onset of Nucleate Boiling in a Narrow Rectangular Channel Under Static and Heaving Conditions,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 39(1), pp. 26–34. 0306-4549 10.1016/j.anucene.2011.09.009
Wang, J., Huang, Y., and Wang, Y., 2011, “Visualized Study on Specific Points on Demand Curves and Flow Patterns in a Single-Side Heated Narrow Rectangular Channel,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 32(5), pp. 982–992. 0142-727X 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2011.07.001
Wu, Y. W., Su, G. H., Hu, B. X., and Qiu, S. Z., 2010, “Study of Onset of Nucleate Boiling in Bilaterally Heated Narrow Annuli,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 49(5), pp. 741–748. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.11.010
Bergles, A. E., and Rohsenow, W. M., 1962, “Forced Convection Surface-Boiling Heat Transfer and Burnout in Tubes of Small Diameter,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Report No. 8767-21Air Force Contract AF 19(604)-7344.
Kennedy, J. E., Roach, G. M., Jr., Dowling, M. F., Abdel-Khalik, S. I., Ghiaasiaan, S. M., Jeter, S. M., and Quershi, Z. H., 2000, “The Onset of Flow Instability in Uniformly Heated Horizontal Microchannels,” J. Heat Transfer, 122(1), pp. 118–125. 0022-1481 10.1115/1.521442
Collier, J. G., and Thome, J. R., 1994, Convective Boiling and Condensation, 3rd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 186–196.
McAdams, W. H., Kennel, W. E., Minden, C. S., Carl, R., Picornell, P. M., and Dew, J. E., 1949, “Heat Transfer at High Rates to Water with Surface Boiling,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 41(9), pp. 1945–1953. 0019-7866 10.1021/ie50477a027
You, S. M., Simon, T. W., and Bar-Cohen, A., 1995, “Effects of Dissolved Gas Content on Pool Boiling of a Highly Wetting Fluid,” J. Heat Transfer, 117(3), pp. 687–692. 0022-1481 10.1115/1.2822631
Rainey, K. N., You, S. M., and Lee, S., 2003, “Effect of Pressure, Subcooling, and Dissolved Gas on Pool Boiling Heat Transfer From Microporous Surfaces in FC-72,” J. Heat Transfer, 125(1), pp. 75–83. 0022-1481 10.1115/1.1527890
Forrest, E. C., Hu, L. W., Buongiorno, J., and McKrell, T. J., “Convective Heat Transfer in a High Aspect Ratio Mini-Channel Heated on One Side,” J. Heat Transfer. (submitted) 0022-1481
Kline, S. J., and McClintock, F. A., 1953, “Describing Uncertainties in Single-Sample Experiments,” Mech. Eng., 75(Jan), pp. 3–8.
Forrest, E., Schulze, R., Liu, C., and Dombrowski, D., 2015, “Influence of Surface Contamination on the Wettability of Heat Transfer Surfaces,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 91, pp. 311–317. 0017-9310 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.07.112

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Hemispherical bubble model (left) and truncated sphere model (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Exploded view of the test section, with thermocouple locations indicated by X’s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Photograph of nominal plate (top) and plate following 600°C oxidation in air (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Partial boiling curves based on local temperature measurements for G=750  kg/m2 s, Tbulk,in=80°C, and Pout=1.3  bar

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Partial forced convection boiling curve for G=3000  kg/m2 s, Tbulk,in=80°C, and Pout=1.3  bar

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Partitioned boiling heat flux for TC13 from the forced convection boiling curve in Fig. 4. A boiling heat flux partition of 7.5% was used to determine the ONB

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Measured heat flux at the ONB, determined using local temperature measurement and the partition heat flux method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of the measured ONB heat flux for the oxidized and nominal surfaces as a function of mass flux. Tests shown are for an inlet temperature of 80°C, and an outlet pressure of 1.3 bar

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Channel pressure drop and relative standard deviation of pressure drop-time signal for G=750  kg/m2 s and Tbulk,in=90°C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

ONB heat flux at channel outlet as determined from pressure measurement fluctuations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Active nucleation site shortly after incipience point. G=750  kg/m2 s and Tbulk,in=90°C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Bubbly flow in channel. G=750  kg/m2 s and Tbulk,in=90°C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Equilibrium contact angle of DI water on the nominal heater surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Static advancing contact angle (left) and static receding contact angle (right) on the nominal heater surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Equilibrium contact angle of DI water on the heavily oxidized heater surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Static advancing contact angle (left) and static receding contact angle (right) on the heavily oxidized heater surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

ONB heat flux versus wall saturation superheat for all tests conducted with Tbulk,in=80°C. In this plot, the Davis–Anderson correlation is shown using the two different equilibrium contact angles measured on the nominal and oxidized surfaces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Measured ONB heat flux versus that predicted using the Bergles–Rohsenow correlation along with the single-phase heat transfer correlation developed for narrow rectangular channels heated on one side (Eq. (22))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Measured ONB heat flux from pressure measurement fluctuations versus that predicted at outlet conditions using the model of Bergles and Rohsenow and Eq. (22)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In