0
Research Papers

The Development of Candling Module Code in Module In-vessel Degraded Analysis Code MIDAC and the Relevant Calculation for CPR1000 During Large-Break LOCA

[+] Author and Article Information
Jun Wang

State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Department of Nuclear Science and Technology,
Xi’an Jiaotong University,
Xi’an 710049, China;
College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison, WI 53706

Yuqiao Fan, Yapei Zhang, Xinghe Ni, Wenxi Tian, Suizheng Qiu

State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Department of Nuclear Science and Technology,
Xi’an Jiaotong University,
Xi’an 710049, China

Michael L. Corradini

College of Engineering,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison, WI 53706

Guanghui Su

State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Department of Nuclear Science and Technology,
Xi’an Jiaotong University,
Xi’an 710049, China
e-mail: ghsu@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received January 27, 2015; final manuscript received October 17, 2015; published online February 29, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Xu Cheng.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 2(2), 021002 (Feb 29, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: NERS-15-1009; doi: 10.1115/1.4031842 History: Received January 27, 2015; Accepted October 17, 2015

The occurrence of Fukushima has increased the focus on the development of severe accident codes and their applications. As a part of Chinese “National Major Projects,” a module in-vessel degraded analysis code (MIDAC) is currently being developed at Xi’an Jiaotong University. The developing situation of a candling module and relevant calculation for CPR1000 for large break loss of coolant analysis (LOCA) are presented in this paper. The candling module focuses on the melting, moving, and relocation of the melting core materials and necessary thermal hydraulic information. MIDAC’s LOCA accident calculation results of Chinese pressure reactor 1000 (CPR1000) cover the melting mass distribution, peak temperature, and hydrogen generation. The results have been compared with MAAP. Through comparison, the candling module of MIDAC proved to be able to predict the moving trend of the molten material mass relocation in the reactor pressure vessel.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Sehgal, B. R., 2012, “Light Water Reactor Safety: A Historical Review (Chap. 1),” Nuclear Safety in Light Water Reactors, S. Bal Raj, , ed., Academic Press, Boston, pp. 1–88.
Muller, W. C., 2006, “Review of Debris Bed Cooling in the TMI-2 Accident,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 236(19–21), pp. 1965–1975. [CrossRef]
Sehgal, B. R., 2001, “Accomplishments and Challenges of the Severe Accident Research,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 210(1), pp. 79–94. 0029-5493 10.1016/S0029-5493(01)00433-2
Ramana, M. V., and Saikawa, E., 2011, “Choosing a Standard Reactor: International Competition and Domestic Politics in Chinese Nuclear Policy,” Energy, 36(12), pp. 6779–6789. 0149-9386 10.1016/j.energy.2011.10.022
Thomas, S., 2012, “What Would the Fukushima Disaster Change?,” Energy Policy, 45, pp. 12–17. 0301-4215 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.010
Bolshov, L., Strizhov, V., and Kisselev, A., 1997, “Severe Accident Codes Status and Future Development,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 173, pp. 247–256. 0029-5493 10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00114-3
Rubin, A., Basu, S., Notafrancesco, A., and Allison, C., 1996, “USNRC Severe Accident Codes- Process, Status and Future Direction of Modeling and Supporting Experimental Activities,” Heat and Mass Transfer in Severe Nuclear Reactor Accidents, International Centre for Heat and Mass Transfer, Bagel House, New York, pp. 447–461.
Lee, M., and Lee, G. D., 1992, “Quantification of Severe Accident Source Terms of BWR4 Reactor With Mark I Containment Using Source Term Code Package,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 138(3), pp. 313–337. 0029-5493 10.1016/0029-5493(92)90069-8
Lee, M., and Ko, Y. C., 2008, “Quantification of Severe Accident Source Term of a Westinghouse 3-Loop Plant,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 238(4), pp. 1080–1092. 0029-5493 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.09.003
Merrill, B. J., Humrickhouse, P. W., and Moore, R. L., 2010, “A Recent Version of MELCOR for Fusion Safety Applications,” Fusion Eng. Des., 85(7–9), pp. 1479–1483. [CrossRef]
Ferng, Y. M., Liu, Y. T., and Shih, C., 2010, “Investigating the Execution of EOPs in LOTDFP+ATWS+LOCA Scenarios for an ABWR Using MAAP Code,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 240(1), pp. 198–203. [CrossRef]
Layly, V. D., Spitz, P., Tirini, S., and Mailliat, A., 1996, “Analysis of the Phebus FPTO Containment Thermal Hydraulics With the Jiricho and Trio-VF Codes,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 166(3), pp. 413–426. 0029-5493 10.1016/S0029-5493(96)01258-7
Sharma, B. M., Tiwari, A., Srivastava, A., Kumar, R., Lele, H. G., Khanna, A., Mushi, P., 2011, “Analysis of PHWR LP Turbine Steady State Using RELAP/ SCDAP Code,” Energy Procedia, 7, pp. 367–373. 1876-6102 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.06.048
Carroll, D. E., Tills, J. L., Valdez, G. D., Bergeron, K. D., and Williams, D. C., 1987, “Integrated Analysis of Core Debris Interactions and Their Effects on Containment Integrity Using the Contain Computer Code,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 104(3), pp. 277–283. 0029-5493 10.1016/0029-5493(87)90205-6
Makynen, J. M., Jokiniemi, J. K., and Kauppinen, E. I., 1997, “LWR Aerosol Experiments at Victoria Module Containment,” J. Aerosol Sci., 28(1), pp. s715–s716. 0021-8502 10.1016/S0021-8502(97)85356-6
Bandini, G., Meloni, P., Polidori, M., and Lombardo, C., 2011, “Validation of CATHARE V2.5 Thermal-Hydraulic Code Against Full-Scale PERSEO Tests for Decay Heat Removal in LWRs,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 241(12), pp. 4662–4671. 0029-5493 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.02.034
Bolshov, L., Strizhov, V., and Kisselev, A., 1997, “Severe Accident Codes Status and Future Development,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 173, pp. 247–256. 0029-5493 10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00114-3
Wang, J., Tian, W. X., Lu, J. N., Ma, Y. Y., Su, G. H., and Qiu, S. Z., 2013, “The Research on Core Molten Materials Process: Oxidation,” 21st International Conference of Nuclear Engineering, Chengdu, China, July 21–Aug. 2, ASME, New York.
Wang, J, Tian, W. X., Fan, Y. Q., Mao, K. Y., Lu, J. N., Su, G. H., and Qiu, S. Z., 2014, “The Development of a Zirconium Oxidation Calculating Program Module for Module In-vessel Degraded Analysis Code MIDAC,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 73, pp. 162–171. 0149-1970 10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.02.006
Sugiyama, K. I., Aoki, H., Su, G. H., and Kojima, Y., 2005, “Experimental Study on Coolability of Particulate Core-Metal Debris Bed with Oxidation, (I) Fragmentation and Enhanced Heat Transfer in Zircaloy-50 wt% Ag Debris Bed,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 42(12), pp. 1081–1084. 0022-3131 10.1080/18811248.2005.9711061
Su, G. H., Sugiyama, K. I., Aoki, H., and Kimura, I., 2006, “Experiment Study on Coolability of Particulate Core-Metal Debris Bed With Oxidization, (II) Fragmentation and Enhanced Heat Transfer in Zircaloy Debris Bed,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 43(5), pp. 537–545. 0022-3131 10.1080/18811248.2006.9711132
Yu, H. X., Zhang, Y. P., Su, G. H., Qiu, S. Z., and Tian, W. X., 2012, “A Theoretical CHF Module for Downward Facing Surfaces and Gaps Under Saturated Boiling,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 45, pp. 30–39. 0301-9322 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2012.05.001
Wang, J., Tian, W. X., Feng, K., Yu, H. X., Zhang, Y. P., Su, G. H., and Qiu, S. Z., 2013, “Development of CHF Models for Inner and Outer RPV Gaps in a Meltdown Severe Accident,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 265, pp. 1045–1056. 0029-5493 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.07.035
Chen, R. H., Corradini, M., Su, G. H., and Qiu, S. Z., 2012, “Development of a Solidification Module for TEXASVI and Application to FARO L14 Analysis,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 249, pp. 1–10. 0029-5639 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.03.034
Wang, J., Tian, W. X., Zhang, Y. P., Chen, L., Li, L. Z., Zhang, L. T., Zhou, Y. K., Su, G. H., Qiu, S. Z., 2014, “The Development of Module In-Vessel Degraded Severe Accident Analysis Code MIDAC and the Relevant Research for CPR1000 During the Station Blackout Scenario,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 76, pp. 44–54. 0149-1970 10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.05.015
Chien, C. S., Wang, S. J., and Chiang, S. C., 2008, “Development of Parameter-Identification Capability for MAAP4 Code,” Nucl. Technol., 161(3), pp. 203–209.
Deng, J., and Cao, X. W., 2008, “Preliminary Analysis of Hydrogen Distribution and Risk Under Severe Accident Conditions for QINSHANNPP Unit 2 Containment,” Nucl. Power Eng., 29(2), pp. 78–84.
Pu, J. L., 2008, “The Formation of the Improved Chinese Pressurized Water Reactor Technology—CPRl000,” Eng. Sci., 10(3), pp. 54–57.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Two mechanisms for flowing downward: (a) outer-membrane flow and (b) internal tubular flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Nodalization of reactor core

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Nodalization of primary loop

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Results of MIDAC in different break sizes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of MIDAC and MAAP4 when break size was 40 cm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of MIDAC and MAAP4 when break size was 30 cm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of MIDAC and MAAP4 when break size was 20 cm

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In