0
Research Papers

Microstructural Effects on the Oxidation Behavior of Alloy 800HT in Supercritical Water

[+] Author and Article Information
Hamed Akhiani

University of Saskatchewan,
57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon S7K5A9, Canada
e-mail: hamed.akhiani@usask.ca

Majid Nezakat

University of Saskatchewan,
57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon S7K5A9, Canada
e-mail: majid.nezakat@usask.ca

Sami Penttilä

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland,
Kemistintie 3, P.O. Box 1000, Espoo, FI-02044 VTT, Finland
e-mail: sami.penttila@vtt.fi

Jerzy Szpunar

University of Saskatchewan,
57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon S7K5A9, Canada
e-mail: jerzy.szpunar@usask.ca

Manuscript received April 7, 2015; final manuscript received July 6, 2015; published online February 29, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Thomas Schulenberg.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 2(2), 021009 (Feb 29, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: NERS-15-1046; doi: 10.1115/1.4031036 History: Received April 07, 2015; Accepted July 07, 2015

Alloy 800HT is one promising candidate for use as a fuel cladding material in supercritical water-cooled rectors. In the present study, specific thermomechanical processing (TMP) was used to study the effects of grain size and grain boundary character distribution (GBCD) on the oxidation behavior of alloy 800HT in supercritical water (SCW). The processed samples were exposed to SCW at 600°C and 25 MPa for 100, 300, and 1000 h. The results showed that grain size and grain boundaries are important factors that affect the oxidation behavior of alloy 800HT in SCW. We also found that TMP improves the adhesion and integrity of the oxide scale.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Weight change of the starting and processed alloy 800HT samples at 100, 300, and 1000 h of SCW exposure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Images of the starting coupon (as received, before exposure), starting and processed samples after 100, 300, and 1000 h of SCW exposure (black and color arrows are just used for better visual contrast)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

SEM image with EDS maps showing different regions which formed upon oxidation of alloy 800HT in SCW: (a) titanium carbide precipitate, (b) enrich chromium oxide, (c) Fe, Cr, Ni spinel, and (d) Fe oxide island [22]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

EBSD (a) band contrast, (b) phase map, (c) IPF Z, and EDS maps of iron oxide islands on the cross section [22]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Cross section of iron oxide islands [22]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Grain size of the processed samples as a function of rolling modes for various reductions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

CSL fraction of the starting and processed (annealed) samples versus reduction percentage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

CSL/GB maps of the 50UDR sample after (a) 100 and (b) 1000 h of SCW exposure. HAGB, black; AGB, gray; Σ3, violet; Σ9, blue; and Σ27: green (for interpretation of the references to color in this figure, the reader is referred to the web version of this article)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

CSL fraction of the 50UDR sample after 0, 100, and 1000 h of SCW exposure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

EBSD band contrast with CSL and phase maps of alloy 800HT: starting (as-received) and 50UDR samples after 1000 h SCW exposure. Σ3, red; Σ7, blue; Σ9, violet; Σ11, yellow; Σ27, green (for interpretation of the references to color in this figure, the reader is referred to the web version of this article)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In