0
Research Papers

Level Dynamics Monitoring of a Once-Through Steam Generator: A New Method Using the Reflectometric Technique

[+] Author and Article Information
Francesco Cordella

ENEA FSN-FUSPHY-SAD—Frascati Research Center, Via E. Fermi, 45, Frascati 00044, Italy e-mail: francesco.cordella@enea.it

Mauro Cappelli

ENEA FSN-FUSPHY-SCM—Frascati Research Center, Via E. Fermi, 45, Frascati 00044, Italy e-mail: mauro.cappelli@enea.it

Massimo Sepielli

ENEA FSN—Casaccia Research Center, Via Anguillarese, 301, Rome 00123, Italy e-mail: massimo.sepielli@enea.it

Manuscript received August 27, 2015; final manuscript received May 19, 2016; published online October 12, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Jovica R. Riznic.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 2(4), 041003 (Oct 12, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: NERS-15-1181; doi: 10.1115/1.4033696 History: Received August 27, 2015; Accepted May 19, 2016

We present here some theoretical and experimental results about the application of the time-domain reflectometry (TDR) technique to a once-through steam generator (OTSG) bayonet-type, which is considered here, from a new point of view, as a coaxial transmission line and used as a level monitoring device for its own dynamics. This original approach leads to the design of a new kind of sensor, employable as a general-level measuring system in harsh conditions as well. This sensor may offer some interesting features for the design of control systems for nuclear facilities as well as for oil and gas plants. In order to experimentally verify the theoretical part, a mockup has been designed and built, so as to be used as a level control for a dedicated hydraulic loop system both in static and dynamic conditions. The purpose of the hydraulic loop system is to implement a short-/medium-term transient-level dynamics requiring fast sensor response, online measurement, and some nonlinearity features that are crucial for its control. The obtained results show that the TDR application on the OTSG is feasible at standard ambient temperature and pressure (SATP) conditions, paving the way for tests at the operating pressure and temperature ranges of a real plant.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Cataldo, A., De Benedetto, E., and Cannazza, G., 2016, Advances in Reflectometric Sensing for Industrial Applications, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, CA.
Anderson, N., and Welch, D., 2000, “Practical Applications of Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) to Monitor and Analyze Soil and Rock Slopes,” Geotechnical Measurements: Lab and Field, W. A. Marr, , ed., ASCE, Reston, VA, pp. 65–79. 10.1061/9780784405185
Nemarich, C., 2001, “Time Domain Reflectometry Liquid Level Sensor,” IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag., 4(4), pp. 40–44. 10.1109/5289.975464
Gerding, M., Musch, T., and Schiek, B., 2006, “A Novel Approach for a High-Precision Multitarget-Level Measurement System Based on Time-Domain Reflectometry,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., 54(6), pp. 2768–2773. 0018-9480 10.1109/TMTT.2006.874891
Thomsen, A., Hansen, B., and Schelde, K., 2000, “Application of TDR to Water Level Measurement,” J. Hydrol., 236, pp. 252–258. 0022-1694 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00305-X
Viswanath, S., Belcastro, M., Barton, J., O’Flynn, B., Holmes, N., and Dixon, P., 2015, “Low-Power Wireless Liquid Monitoring System Using Ultrasonic Sensors,” Int. J. Smart Sens. Intell. Syst., 8(1), pp. 26–44.
Friel, R., and Or, D., 1999, “Frequency Analysis of Time-Domain Reflectometry (TDR) With Application to Dielectric Spectroscopy of Soil Constituents,” Geophysics, 64(3), pp. 707–718. 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1444580
Bera, S. C., Mandal, H., Saha, S., and Dutta, A., 2014, “Study of a Modified Capacitance-Type Level Transducer for any Type of Liquid,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 63(3), pp. 641–649. 0018-9456 10.1109/TIM.2013.2282194
Cordella, F., Cappelli, M., and Sepielli, M., 2014, “Using the Reflectometric Technique for Monitoring the Boiling Flow Dynamics in a Once Through Steam Generator,” Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Nuclear Engineering ICONE22, Vol. 6, July 7–11, ASME, New York.
Cordella, F., Cappelli, M., and Sepielli, M., 2015, “Level Dynamics Monitoring using a Coaxial Reflectometric Sensor and a Low-Pulsatility Pump: preliminary experimental results,” Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Nuclear Engineering ICONE23, May 17–21, Chiba, Japan.
Dolezal, R., and Varcop, L., 1970, Process Dynamics, Elsevier Publishing, New York.
Ray, A., 1980, “Dynamic Modeling of Once-Through Subcritical Steam Generator for Solar Applications,” Appl. Math. Model., 4(6), pp. 417–423. 0307-904X 10.1016/0307-904X(80)90173-0
Ray, A., 1981, “Nonlinear Dynamic Model of a Solar Steam Generator,” Solar Energy, 26(4), pp. 297–306. 0038-092X 10.1016/0038-092X(81)90175-4
Tzanos, C. P., 1988, “Movable Boundary Model for Once-Through Steam Generator Analysis,” Nucl. Technol., 82(1), pp. 5–17.
Abdalla, M. A., 1994, “A Four-Region, Moving-Boundary Model of a Once-Through, Helical Coil Steam Generator,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 21(9), pp. 541–562. 0306-4549 10.1016/0306-4549(94)90078-7
Li, H., Huang, X., and Zhang, L., 2008, “A Lumped Parameter Dynamic Model of the Helical Coiled Once-Through Steam Generator With Movable Boundaries,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 238(7), pp. 1657–1663. 0029-5493 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.01.009
Jingyan, Z., Guo, Y., and Zhijian, Z., 2012, “Dynamic Simulation of Once-Through Steam Generator With Concentric Annuli Tube,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 50, pp. 185–198. 0306-4549 10.1016/j.anucene.2012.04.027
Maffezzoni, C., 1989, The Dynamics of Steam Generators, Masson Ed., (in Italian).
Magnusson, P. C., Weisshaar, A., Tripathi, V. K., and Alexander, G. C., 2001, Transmission Lines and Wave Propagation, 4th ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Orfanidis, S. J., 2016, “Electromagnetic Waves and Antennas.” Available: ∼ http://www.ece.rutgers.edu/∼orfanidi/ewa/.
Pozar, D. M., 2011, Microwave Engineering, 4th ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Buchner, R., Barthel, J., and Stauber, J., 1999, “The Dielectric Relaxation of Water Between 0°C and 35°C,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 306, pp. 57–63. 0009-2614 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00455-8
Nayfeh, A. H., and Mook, D. T., 1979, Nonlinear Oscillation, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Simulation results for different physical parameters: (a) pressure, (b) L1 level, and (c) L2 level response to a step of flow rate and thermal flux

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Pictorial view of the heat-transfer regions in a general OTSG

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic view of the experimental configuration for “static” level measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Different “static” level measurements (from right to left: baseline in air, 10.5×10−2  m, 20.5×10−2  m, 40×10−2  m of water at 293.15 K)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Hydraulic loop for “dynamic” level measures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Experimental data and fitting curve of the step function response

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Level sensor geometries, details, and simplified model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Data streaming viewed with ML

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Zoom of the level-point determination algorithm with the complete rs–bs curve (inset)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Level-detection algorithm block diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

rs–bs (dashed black line), rs–bs piecewise linear approx. (thick dashed line), rs–bs first derivative (dashed-dotted thin line)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In