0
Research Papers

Neutronic Design Features of a Transportable Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor

[+] Author and Article Information
Kaichao Sun

Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
77 Massachusetts Avenue,
Cambridge, MA 02139
e-mail: kaichao@mit.edu

Lin-Wen Hu, Charles Forsberg

Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
77 Massachusetts Avenue,
Cambridge, MA 02139

Manuscript received September 1, 2015; final manuscript received February 11, 2016; published online June 17, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Akos Horvath.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 2(3), 031003 (Jun 17, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: NERS-15-1184; doi: 10.1115/1.4032873 History: Received September 01, 2015; Accepted February 11, 2016

The fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature reactor (FHR) is a new reactor concept, which combines low-pressure liquid salt coolant and high-temperature tristructural isotropic (TRISO) particle fuel. The refractory TRISO particle coating system and the dispersion in graphite matrix enhance safeguards (nuclear proliferation resistance) and security. Compared to the conventional high-temperature reactor (HTR) cooled by helium gas, the liquid salt system features significantly lower pressure, larger volumetric heat capacity, and higher thermal conductivity. The salt coolant enables coupling to a nuclear air-Brayton combined cycle (NACC) that provides base-load and peak-power capabilities. Added peak power is produced using jet fuel or locally produced hydrogen. The FHR is, therefore, considered as an ideal candidate for the transportable reactor concept to provide power to remote sites. In this context, a 20-MW (thermal power) compact core aiming at an 18-month once-through fuel cycle is currently under design at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). One of the key challenges of the core design is to minimize the reactivity swing induced by fuel depletion, since excessive reactivity will increase the complexity in control rod design and also result in criticality risk during the transportation process. In this study, burnable poison particles (BPPs) made of B4C with natural boron (i.e., 20% B10 content) are adopted as the key measure for fuel cycle optimization. It was found that the overall inventory and the individual size of BPPs are the two most important parameters that determine the evolution path of the multiplication factor over time. The packing fraction (PF) in the fuel compact and the height of active zone are of secondary importance. The neutronic effect of Li6 depletion was also quantified. The 18-month once-through fuel cycle is optimized, and the depletion reactivity swing is reduced to 1 beta. The reactivity control system, which consists of six control rods and 12 safety rods, has been implemented in the proposed FHR core configuration. It fully satisfies the design goal of limiting the maximum reactivity worth for single control rod ejection within 0.8 beta and ensuring shutdown margin with the most valuable safety rod fully withdrawn. The core power distribution including the control rod’s effect is also demonstrated in this paper.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Forsberg, C., Hu, L., Peterson, P., and Sridharan, K., 2014, “Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-temperature Reactor (FHR) for Power and Process Heat,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Final Project Report, MIT-ANP-TR-157.
Forsberg, C., Curtis, D., Stempien, J., MacDonald, R., and Peterson, P., 2014, “Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-temperature Reactor (FHR) Commercial Basis and Commercialization Strategy,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT-ANP-TR-153.
Forsberg, C., Hu, L., Richard, J., Romatoski, R., Forget, B., Stempien, J., Ballinger, R., Sun, K., and Carpenter, D., 2014, “Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Test Reactor (FHTR): Goals, Options, Ownership, Requirements, Design, Licensing, and Support Facilities,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT-ANP-TR-154.
Andreades, C., Cisneros, A., Choi, J., Fratoni, M., Hong, S., Huddar, L., Huff, K., Krumwiede, D., Laufer, M., Munk, M., Scarlat, R., Zweibaum, N., Greenspan, E., and Peterson, P., 2014, “Technical Description of the “Mark 1” Pebble-Bed Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor (PB-FHR) Power Plant,” University of California, Berkeley, UCBTH-14-002.
Kloosterman, J. L., van Dam, H., and van der Hagen, T. H. J. J., 2003, “Applying Burnable Poison Particles to Reduce the Reactivity Swing in High Temperature Reactors With Batch-Wise Fuel Loading,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 222(2–3), pp. 105–115. 0029-5493 10.1016/S0029-5493(03)00006-2
Obara, T., and Onoe, T., 2013, “Flattening of Burnup Reactivity in Long-Life Prismatic HTGR by Particle Type Burnable Poisons,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 57, pp. 216–220. 0306-4549 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.02.002
Tran, H. N., and Kato, Y., 2009, “An Optimal Loading Principle of Burnable Poisons for an OTTO Refueling Scheme in Pebble Bed HTGR Cores,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 239(11), pp. 2357–2364. 0029-5493 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.07.022
Wang, C., Sun, K., Hu, L., Qiu, S., Zhang, D., and Su, G., 2015, “Thermal-Hydraulic Design Features of Transportable Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor,” ANS Annual Meeting, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL, Paper No. 13642.
Wang, C., Sun, K., Hu, L., Zhang, D., and Qiu, S., 2015, “Three-Dimensional Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of a Transportable Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor,” 16th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-16), American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL, Paper No. 13151.
Stempien, J., Hunn, J., and Snead, L., 2013, Personal communication.
Potter, R., and Shenoy, A., 1996, “Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor (GTMHR) Conceptual Design Description Report,” GA Report 910720, Revision 1, General Atomics, San Diego, CA.
Cheng, W. C., Sun, K., Hu, L. W., and Chieng, C. C., 2015, “Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis for Asymmetric Power Generation in a Prismatic Fuel Block of Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Test Reactor,” ASME J. Nuc. Eng. Radiat. Sci., 1, pp. 011003. 10.1115/1.4026391
X-5 Monte Carlo Team, 2008, MCNP—A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code, Version 5, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Xu, Z., 2003, “Design Strategies for Optimizing High Burnup Fuel in Pressurized Water Reactors,” Doctor thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Sun, K., Ames, M., Newton, T., and Hu, L., 2014, “Validation of a Fuel Management Code MCODE-FM Against Fission Product Poisoning and Flux Wire Measurements of the MIT Reactor,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 75, pp. 42–48. 0149-1970 10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.04.001
MacDonald, R., and Forsberg, C., 2014, “Strategies for a Small Transportable FHR With Reduced Safety, Security, and Safeguards Systems,” Proceedings of the 2014 International Congress on Advanced Power Plants (ICAPP 2014), Charlotte, NC, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL, Paper No. 14024.
MacDonald, R., 2014, “Investigation and Design of a Secure, Transportable Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-temperature Reactor (TFHR) for Isolated Locations,” Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Forsberg, C. W., and Peterson, P. F., 2015, “Spent Nuclear Fuel and Graphite Management for Salt-Cooled Reactors: Storage, Safeguards, and Repository Disposal,” Nucl. Technol., 191(2), pp. 113–121. 0029-5450 10.13182/NT14-88

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Perspective of TRISO fuel particle (top left), horizontal schematic of fuel compact (top right), and horizontal cross section of fuel block (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Horizontal (top) and vertical (bottom) cross section of the proposed FHR core; different FHR core components and the depletion zones are illustrated

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

BPP kernel radius of 0.026 cm (left) and 0.015 cm (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variation of atomic density ratio between carbon and uranium as a function of PF in the fuel compact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Evolution of Li6 atomic concentration along the FHR irradiation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

keff evolution of reference FHR core without BPPs implemented and the cases with different BPPs inventories; F/P represents the fuel-to-poison volumetric ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Core-average neutron spectra of the cases without BPPs and with F/P=70

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

keff evolution of the cases with different PFs; for all the presented cases, F/P=70

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

keff evolution of the cases with different core heights; for all the presented cases, F/P=70, PF=0.35

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

keff evolution of the cases with different BPP kernel radiuses (RBPP); for all the presented cases, F/P=70, PF=0.35, and core height=130  cm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

keff evolution of the cases with (solid lines) and without (dash lines) Li6 depletion taken into account

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Individual control rod reactivity worth with different rod dimensions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Integral control rod reactivity worth with different maximum inserted positions (control rod radius of 2.6 cm is adopted for the calculations.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Distribution of power peaking factors in 1/12th FHR core for BOL state with 52% control rod insertion (left); the black shaded area in the schematic (right) illustrates the presented 1/12th core region

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

FHR with NACC power system

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In