0
Research Papers

Experimental and Numerical Study of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Flow Through Valves

[+] Author and Article Information
Haomin Yuan

Department of Engineering Physics,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
1500 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI 53706
e-mail: hyuan8@wisc.edu

Mark Anderson

Department of Engineering Physics,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
1500 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI 53706
e-mail: manderson@engr.wisc.edu

Manuscript received June 8, 2015; final manuscript received January 25, 2016; published online June 17, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Andrey Churkin.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 2(3), 031004 (Jun 17, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: NERS-15-1112; doi: 10.1115/1.4032640 History: Received June 08, 2015; Accepted January 25, 2016

The supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) Brayton cycle shows advantages such as high efficiency, compactness, and low capital cost. These benefits make it a competitive candidate for future-generation power-conversion cycles. In order to study this cycle, valve characteristics under sCO2 flow conditions must be studied. However, the traditional models for valves may not be accurate due to the real gas property of sCO2. In this study, this problem was studied both experimentally and numerically. A small valve was tested in the authors’ experiment facility first to provide validation data. For this valve, numerical predictions of mass flow rate agree with experimental data. Then, simulations were scaled up to valves in a real power-cycle design. The traditional gas-service valve model fails to predict mass flow rate at low-pressure ratios. A modification was proposed to improve the current gas-service valve model by changing the choked-flow check.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

System and T–S diagram of sCO2 recompression Brayton cycle [3]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic and T–S diagram of sCO2 test facility at University of Wisconsin-Madison

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Dimensions and inner geometry of SS-31RS4 [8]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Computational domain for test valve geometry (not to scale)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of experiment and simulation for test valve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Mass flow rate of valve from different sources at 50% open

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Globe valve and plugs by Flowserve [17]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Computational domain for globe valve by Flowserve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Tested upstream conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Globe valve with 50% open with upstream condition of 7.7 MPa at 498  kg/m3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Globe valve with 50% open with upstream condition of 8.5 MPa at 313  kg/m3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Globe valve with 50% open with upstream condition of 15 MPa at 383  kg/m3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Mach number of upstream of 8.5 MPa at 313  kg/m3 and downstream of 7.6 MPa

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Mach number of upstream of 15 MPa at 383  kg/m3 and downstream of 14 MPa

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Quality of upstream of 8.5 MPa at 313  kg/m3 and downstream of 7.0 MPa

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Quality of upstream of 15 MPa at 383  kg/m3 and downstream of 9.0 MPa

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In