0
Research Papers

Analysis and Assessment of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor for Nuclear Desalination

[+] Author and Article Information
Farrukh Khalid

Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science,
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
e-mail: farrukh.khalid@uoit.ca

Ibrahim Dincer

Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science,
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
e-mail: ibrahim.dincer@uoit.ca

Marc A. Rosen

Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science,
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
e-mail: marc.rosen@uoit.ca

Manuscript received August 26, 2015; final manuscript received January 3, 2016; published online June 17, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Masaki Morishita.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 2(3), 031014 (Jun 17, 2016) (6 pages) Paper No: NERS-15-1180; doi: 10.1115/1.4032508 History: Received August 26, 2015; Accepted January 03, 2016

A thermodynamic analysis of the coupling of a reverse osmosis (RO) process with the gas turbine-modular helium reactor (GT-MHR) is presented in which the waste heat is utilized for the generation of steam as it is expanded in a steam turbine. A comprehensive parametric study is carried out to reveal the effect of some parameters such as compression ratio, turbine inlet temperature, recovery ratio, and preheated feed seawater inlet temperature on the exergy efficiencies of the RO process, electricity generation process, electricity generation without steam turbine work output, and overall system. The analysis shows that the exergy efficiency of the electric generation process is increased by 10.3%, if the waste heat from the reactor is utilized. The exergy efficiencies of the RO process, electricity generation process, electricity generation without steam turbine work output, and overall system are found to be 89.0%, 40.0%, 29.7%, and 41.0%, respectively.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Kim, H. S., and No, H. C., 2014, “Thermal Coupling of HTGRs and MED Desalination Plants, and Its Performance and Cost Analysis for Nuclear Desalination,” Desalination, 303, pp. 17–22. 0011-9164 10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.004
Adak, A. K., and Tewari, P. K., 2014, “Technical Feasibility Study for Coupling a Desalination Plant to an Advanced Heavy Water Reactor,” Desalination, 337, pp. 76–82. 0011-9164 10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.004
IAEA, 1992, “Technical and Economic Evaluation of Potable Water Production Through Desalination of Seawater by Using Nuclear Energy and Other Means,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, .
Baldwin, D., Campbell, M., Ellis, C., Richards, M., and Shenoy, A., 2008, “MHR Design, Technology and Applications,” Energy Convers. Manage., 49, pp. 1898–1901.
El-Genk, M. S., and Tournier, J. M., 2008, “On the Use of Noble Gases and Binary Mixtures as Reactor Coolants and CBC Working Fluids,” Energy Convers. Manage., 49, pp. 1882–1891. 0196-8904 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.08.017
El-Genk, M. S., and Tournier, J. M., 2008, “Noble Gas Binary Mixtures for Gas Cooled Reactor Power Plants,” Nucl. Eng., 238, pp. 1353–1372. [CrossRef]
Tournier, J. M., and El-Genk, M. S., 2008, “Properties of Noble Gases and Binary Mixtures for Closed Brayton Cycle Applications,” Energy Convers. Manage., 49, pp. 469–492. 0196-8904 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.06.050
Mohammadkhani, F., Shokati, N., Mahmoudi, S. M. S., Yari, M., and Rosen, M. A., 2014, “Exergoeconmic Assessment and Parametric Study of a Gas Turbine Modular Helium Reactor Combined With Two Organic Rankine Cycles,” Energy, 65, pp. 533–543. 0149-9386 10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.002
Dardour, S., Nisan, S., and Charbit, F., 2007, “Utilisation of Waste Heat From GT-MHR and PBMR Reactors for Nuclear Desalination,” Desalination, 205, pp. 254–268. 0011-9164 10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.554
Nisan, S., and Dardour, S., 2007, “Economic Evaluation of Nuclear Desalination Systems,” Desalination, 205, pp. 231–242. 0011-9164 10.1016/j.desal.2006.05.014
Dincer, I., and Rosen, M. A., 2013, Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development, 2nd ed., Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G., and Moran, M., 1995, Thermal Design and Optimization, Wiley-Interscience/Wiley, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Exergy destruction ratio of some major components of the system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

GT-MHR coupled with RO process for desalination and electricity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Overall energy balance for the GT-MHR. (b) Overall exergy balance for the GT-MHR. “Other” in the exergy diagram refers to emissions and consumption losses.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Effects on the exergy efficiencies of pressure ratio (rp)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effects on the exergy efficiencies of gas turbine inlet temperature (T1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effects on the exergy efficiencies of preheated feed seawater inlet temperature (T20)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effects on the exergy efficiencies of recovery ratio (rr)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In