0
Research Papers

Prediction Method of Countercurrent Flow Limitation in a Pressurizer Surge Line and Its Evaluation for a 1/10-Scale Model

[+] Author and Article Information
Michio Murase

Mem. ASME
Institute of Nuclear Safety System, Inc.,
64 Sata, Mihama-cho, Mikata-gun,
Fukui 919-1205, Japan
e-mail: murase@inss.co.jp

Yoichi Utanohara

Institute of Nuclear Safety System, Inc.,
64 Sata, Mihama-cho, Mikata-gun,
Fukui 919-1205, Japan
e-mail: utanohara@inss.co.jp

Takayoshi Kusunoki

Institute of Nuclear Safety System, Inc.,
64 Sata, Mihama-cho, Mikata-gun,
Fukui 919-1205, Japan
e-mail: kusunoki.takayoshi@inss.co.jp

Dirk Lucas

Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf,
P.O. Box 510 119, Dresden 01314, Germany
e-mail: d.lucas@hzdr.de

Akio Tomiyama

Kobe University,
1-1 Rokkodai, Nada-ku, Kobe-shi,
Hyogo 657-8501, Japan
e-mail: tomiyama@mech.kobe-u.ac.jp

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received July 16, 2015; final manuscript received May 10, 2016; published online June 17, 2016. Editor: Igor Pioro.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 2(3), 031021 (Jun 17, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: NERS-15-1164; doi: 10.1115/1.4033629 History: Received July 16, 2015; Accepted May 10, 2016

The method for predicting countercurrent flow limitation (CCFL) and its uncertainty in an actual pressurizer surge line of a pressurized water reactor (PWR) using 1/10-scale air–water experimental data, one-dimensional (1D) computations, and three-dimensional (3D) numerical simulations was proposed. As one step of the prediction method, 3D numerical simulations were carried out for countercurrent air–water flows in a 1/10-scale model of the pressurizer surge line to evaluate capability of the 3D simulation method and decide uncertainty of CCFL characteristics evaluated for the 1/10-scale model. The model consisted of a vertical pipe, a vertical elbow, and a slightly inclined pipe with elbows. In the actual 1/10-scale experiment, air supplied into the lower tank flowed upward to the upper tank and water supplied into the upper tank gravitationally flowed downward to the lower tank through the pressurizer surge line. In the 3D simulation, however, water was supplied from the wall surface of the vertical pipe to avoid effects of flooding at the upper end (the 3D simulation largely underestimated falling water flow rates at the upper end). Then, the flow pattern in the slightly inclined pipe was successfully reproduced, and the simulated CCFL values for the inclination angle of θ=0.6  deg (slope of 1/100) agreed well with the experimental CCFL data. The uncertainty among air–water experiments, 1D computations, and 3D simulations for the 1/10-scale model was dC=±0.015 for the CCFL constant of C=0.50. The effects of θ (θ=0,1.0 deg) on CCFL characteristics were simulated and discussed.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Richter, H. J., Wallis, G. B., Carter, K. H., and Murphy, S. L., 1978, “Deentrainment and Countercurrent Air-Water Flow in a Model PWR Hot-Leg,” U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, .
Mayinger, F., Weiss, P., and Wolfert, K., 1993, “Two-Phase Flow Phenomena in Full-Scale Reactor Geometry,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 145(1–2), pp. 47–61. 0029-5493 10.1016/0029-5493(93)90058-H
Geffraye, G., Bazin, P., Pichon, P., and Bengaouer, A., 1995, “CCFL in Hot Legs and Steam Generators and Its Prediction With the CATHARE Code,” Proceedings of the 7th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-7), Saratoga Springs, NY, Sep. 10–15, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL, pp. 815–826.
Al Issa, S., and Macian, R., 2014, “Experimental Investigation of Countercurrent Flow Limitation (CCFL) in a Large-Diameter Hot-Leg Geometry: A Derailed Description of CCFL Mechanisms, Flow Patterns and High-Quality HSC Imaging of the Interfacial Structure in a 1/3.9 Scale of PWR Geometry,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 280(Dec.), pp. 550–563. 0029-5493 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.08.021
Minami, N., Nishiwaki, D., Nariai, T., Tomiyama, A., and Murase, M., 2010, “Countercurrent Gas-Liquid Flow in a PWR Hot Leg under Reflux Cooling (I) Air-Water Tests for 1/15-Scale Model of a PWR Hot Leg,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 47(2), pp. 142–148. 10.1080/18811248.2010.9711938
Kinoshita, I., Murase, M., Utanohara, Y., Lucas, D., Vallée, C., and Tomiyama, A., 2014, “Effects of Shape and Size on Countercurrent Flow Limitation in Flow Channels Simulating a PWR Hot Leg,” Nucl. Technol., 187(1), pp. 44–56.
Murase, M., Tomiyama, A., Lucas, D., Kinoshita, I., Utanohara, Y., and Yanagi, C., 2012, “Correlation for Countercurrent Flow Limitation in a PWR Hot Leg,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 49(4), pp. 398–407. 10.1080/00223131.2012.669241
Wallis, G. B., 1969, One-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 336–345.
Takeuchi, K., Young, M. Y., and Gagnon, A. F., 1999, “Flooding in the Pressurizer Surge Line of AP600 Plant and Analyses of APEX Data,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 192(1), pp. 45–58. 0029-5493 10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00084-9
Vierow, K., Choutapalli, I., Hogan, K., Liao, Y., Solmos, M., and Williams, S. N., 2008, “Countercurrent Flow Limitation Experiments and Modeling for Improved Reactor Safety,” Nuclear Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Cllum, W., Reid, J., and Vierow, K., 2012, “Water Inlet Subcooling Effects on Flooding With Steam and Water in a Large Diameter Vertical Tube,” The 2012 Japan-U.S. Seminar on Two-Phase Flow Dynamics, Tokyo, June 7–12, Tokyo Univ. Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, T09.
Futatsugi, T., Yanagi, C., Murase, M., Hosokawa, S., and Tomiyama, A., 2012, “Countercurrent Air-Water Flow in a Scale-Down Model of a Pressurizer Surge Line,” Sci. Technol. Nucl. Installations, 2012(2012), pp. 1–7. 10.1155/2012/174838
Murase, M., Kinoshita, I., Kusunoki, T., Lucas, D., and Tomiyama, A., 2015, “Countercurrent Flow Limitation in a Slightly Inclined Pipe With Elbows,” Trans. ASME J. Nucl. Eng. Radiation Sci., 1(4), 041009. 10.1115/1.4031032
Doi, T., Futatsugi, T., Murase, M., Hayashi, K., Hosokawa, S., and Tomiyama, A., 2012, “Countercurrent Flow Limitation at the Junction Between the Surge Line and the Pressurizer of a PWR,” Sci. Technol. Nucl. Installations, 2012(2012), pp. 1–10. 10.1155/2012/754724
Utanohara, Y., Kinoshita, I., Murase, M., Minami, N., Nariai, T., and Tomiyama, A., 2011, “Numerical Simulation Using CFD Software of Countercurrent Gas-Liquid Flow in a PWR Hot Leg Under Reflux Condition,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 241(5), pp. 1643–1655. 0029-5493 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.01.051
Wang, M. J., and Mayinger, F., 1995, “Simulation and Analysis of Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena in a PWR Hot Leg Related to SBLOCA,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 155(3), pp. 643–652. 0029-5493 10.1016/0029-5493(95)00977-K
Aan, D., Höhne, T., Lucas, D., and Vallée, C., 2010, “Numerical Simulation of Air-Water Counter-Current Two-Phase Flow in a Model of the Hot-Leg of a Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR),” Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Multiphase Flow (ICMF 2010), Tampa, FL, May 30–June 4, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Höhne, T., Aan, D., and Lucas, D., 2011, “Numerical Simulations of Counter-Current Two-Phase Flow Experiments in a PWR Hot Leg Model Using an Interfacial Area Density Model,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 32(5), pp. 1047–1056. 0142-727X 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2011.05.007
Al Issa, S., and Macian-Juan, R., 2016, “Experimental Investigation and CFD Validation of Countercurrent Flow Limitation (CCFL) in a Large-Diameter Hot-Leg PWR Geometry,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 53(5), pp. 647–655. 10.1080/00223131.2015.1125312
Murase, M., Utanohara, Y., Yanagi, C., Takata, T., Yamaguchi, A., and Tomiyama, A., 2013, “Numerical Simulation of Countercurrent Flow Limitation in a PWR Hot Leg by Using Two-Fluid Model,” J. Energy Power Eng., 7(7), pp. 1215–1222.
Murase, M., Tomiyama, A., Kinoshita, I., Utanohara, Y., Yanagi, C., Takata, T., and Yamaguchi, A., 2012, “VOF Calculations of Countercurrent Gas-Liquid Flow in a PWR Hot Leg,” Sci. Technol. Nucl. Installations, 2012(2012), pp. 1–9. 10.1155/2012/935391
Kusunoki, T., Doi, T., Fujii, Y., Tsuji, T., Murase, M., and Tomiyama, A., 2014, “Air-Water Tests on Counter-current Flow Limitation at Lower End of Vertical Pipe Simulating Lower Part of Steam Generator U-tube,” Jpn. J. Multiphase Flow, 28(1), pp. 62–70 (in Japanese). 10.3811/jjmf.28.62
Kusunoki, T., Murase, M., Takata, T., and Tomiyama, A., 2014, “Numerical Simulations of Counter-Current Flow Limitation at Lower End of Vertical Pipe Simulating Lower Part of Steam Generator U-tube,” Jpn. J. Multiphase Flow, 28(3), pp. 345–354 (in Japanese). 10.3811/jjmf.28.345
Murae, M., Kinoshita, I., and Kusunoki, T., 2016, “Prediction Accuracy of One-Dimensional Computation for Countercurrent Flow Limitation in Horizontal Pipes,” Jpn. J. Multiphase Flow, 29(5), pp. 523–531 (in Japanese). 10.3811/jjmf.29.523

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Computational grid for the experimental setup shown in Fig. 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Experimental setup for the 1/10-scale model of a pressurizer surge line [12]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Flow pattern simulated with water supply into the upper tank (θ=0.6  deg, JG=3.0  m/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Changes of simulated water mass in the lower tank at θ=0 and 1.0 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effects of inclination angle on CCFL characteristics

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Observed and simulated flow patterns (θ=0.6  deg). (a) Observed at JG=3.8  m/s [12]. (b) Simulated at JG=3.0  m/s (water supply from the vertical pipe)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Changes of simulated water mass in the lower tank at θ=0.6  deg (one plot for 100 time steps). (a) Water mass in the lower tank. (b) Water flow rate into the lower tank

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

CCFL characteristics (θ=0.6  deg)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of CCFL characteristics (1D: 1D computation, 3D: 3D simulation, dC: uncertainty of CCFL constant)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In