0
Research Papers

SMR Fuel Cycle Optimization Using LWROpt

[+] Author and Article Information
Keith E. Ottinger

University of Tennessee,
Department of Nuclear Engineering,
Pasqua Engineering Building, Knoxville, TN 37996-2300
e-mail: kottinge@utk.edu

G. Ivan Maldonado

University of Tennessee,
Department of Nuclear Engineering,
Pasqua Engineering Building, Knoxville, TN 37996-2300
e-mail: ivan@utk.edu

Manuscript received May 6, 2016; final manuscript received August 16, 2016; published online December 20, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Akos Horvath.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 3(1), 011014 (Dec 20, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: NERS-16-1047; doi: 10.1115/1.4034573 History: Received May 06, 2016; Accepted August 16, 2016

This article describes the light water reactor optimizer (LWROpt), a fuel cycle optimization code originally developed for BWRs, which has been adapted to perform core fuel reload and/or operational control rod management for pressurized water reactors (PWRs) and small modular reactors (SMRs), as well. Additionally, the eighth-core symmetric shuffle option is introduced to help expedite large-scale optimizations. These new features of the optimizer are tested by performing optimizations starting from a base case of an SMR core model that was developed manually and unrodded. The new fuel inventory (NFI) and loading pattern (LP) search in LWROpt was able to eliminate all of the constraint violations present in the initial base solution. However, independent control rod pattern (CRP) searches for the best several LPs found were not successful in generating CRPs without any constraint violations. This indicates that fully decoupling the fuel loading from the CRP optimization can increase the computational tractability of these calculations but at the expense of effectiveness. To improve on the individual search results, a coupled fuel loading (NFI and LP) and CRP search was performed, which produced a better overall result but still with some small constraint violations, emphasizing the fact that optimizing the fuel loading arrangement in a small high-leakage unborated core while concurrently determining its operational rod patterns for a 4-year operational cycle is no easy feat even to an experienced core designer; thus, this process can be greatly aided by employing automated combinatorial optimization tools.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Ottinger, K. E., and Maldonado, G. I., 2015, “BWROPT: A Multi-Cycle BWR Fuel Cycle Optimization Code,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 291, pp. 236–243. [CrossRef]
Ottinger, K. E., 2014, “Multi-Cycle Boiling Water Reactor Fuel Cycle Optimization,” Ph.D. thesis, http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2720.
Ottinger, K. E., Collins, P. E., Luciano, N. P., and Maldonado, G. I., 2015, “SMR Fuel Cycle Optimization and Control Rod Depletion Using NESTLE and LWROPT,” Proceedings of ANFM 2015, Hilton Head Island, SC, American Nuclear Society Scientific Publications, Lagrange Park, IL.
Chu, K.-W., Deng, Y., and Reinitz, J., 1999, “Parallel Simulated Annealing by Mixing of States,” J. Comput. Phys., 148, pp. 646–662. [CrossRef]
Turinsky, P., Al-Chalabi, R., Engrand, P., Sarsour, H., Faure, F., and Guo, W., 1995, “Code Abstract - NESTLE: A Few-Group Neutron Diffusion Equation Solver Utilizing the Nodal Expansion Method for Eigenvalue, Adjoint, Fixed-Source Steady-State and Transient Problems,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 120, pp. 72–73.
Galloway, J., Hernandez, H., Maldonado, G. I., Jessee, M., Popov, E., and Clarno, K., 2010, “BWR Modeling Capability and SCALE/TRITON Lattice-to-Core Integration of the NESTLE Nodal Simulator,” Proceedings of PHYSOR 2010, Pittsburgh, PA, American Nuclear Society Scientific Publications, Lagrange Park, IL.
Luciano, N. P., et al. , 2015, “The NESTLE 3D Nodal Simulator: Modern Reactor Models,” Proceedings of M&C 2015, Nashville, TN, American Nuclear Society Scientific Publications, Lagrange Park, IL.
Kenner, K. R., Montgomery, R., and Maldonado, G. I., 2014, “Modeling an iPWR Startup Core Cycle with VERA,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 111, pp. 1388–1390. 0003-018X
Erighin, M., 2012, “A 48-Month Extended Fuel Cycle for the B&W mPower™ Small Modular Nuclear Reactor,” Proceedings of PHYSOR 2012, Knoxville, TN, American Nuclear Society Scientific Publications, Lagrange Park, IL.
Scarangella, M., 2012, “An Extended Conventional Fuel Cycle for the B&W mPower™ Small Modular Reactor,” Proceedings of PHYSOR 2012, Knoxville, TN, American Nuclear Society Scientific Publications, Lagrange Park, IL.
Kropaczek, D. J., and Russell, W. E., 2003, “Method for Optimization of BWR Fuel Management and Plant Operations,” Proceedings of ANFM 2003, Hilton Head Island, SC, American Nuclear Society Scientific Publications, Lagrange Park, IL.
Moore, B., Turinsky, P., and Karve, A., 1999, “FORMOSA-B: A Boiling Water Reactor In-Core Fuel Management Optimization Package,” Nucl. Technol., 126, pp. 153–169.
Haling, R. K., 1964, “Operating Strategy for Maintaining an Optimum Power Distribution Throughout Life,” Proceedings of American Nuclear Society Topical Meeting, Nuclear Performance of Power-Reactor Cores, San Francisco, CA, Sept. 26, 1963, American Nuclear Society Scientific Publications, Lagrange Park, IL, .
Gentry, C. A., Maldonado, G. I., and Kim, K. S., 2016, “Development of Two-Step Analysis Procedure for the Advanced High Temperature Reactor,” Proceedings of PHYSOR 2016, Sun Valley, ID, American Nuclear Society Scientific Publications, Lagrange Park, IL.
Luciano, N. P., Maldonado, G. I., and Gauld, I., 2016, “Modeling and Simulation of an Operational VVER-1000 Benchmark with NESTLE,” Proceedings of the 2016 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2016), San Francisco, CA, American Nuclear Society Scientific Publications, Lagrange Park, IL.
Lin, L. S., and Lin, C., 1991, “A Rule-Based Expert System for Automatic Control Rod Pattern Generation for Boiling Water Reactors,” Nucl. Technol., 95, pp. 1–011014-8.
Karve, A., and Turinsky, P., 2000, “FORMOSA-B: A Boiling Water Reactor In-Core Fuel Management Optimization Package II,” Nucl. Technol., 131, pp. 48–68.
Taner, M. S., Levine, S. H., and Hsiao, M.-Y., 1992, “A Two-Step Method for Developing a Control Rod Program for Boiling Water Reactors,” Nucl. Technol., 97, pp. 27–38.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Baseline design LP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Diagram of the core assembly layout with dimensions and a blowup to show the node structure used in NESTLE

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Locations of the CR regions of influence

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Best LP found by LWROpt using the coupled LP/CRP optimization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

CR bank and group locations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Best LP found by LWROpt using only the LP optimization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Constraint values as a function of burnup for the best LP/CRP for the individual searches case (constraint limits shown with horizontal lines)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

CRPs generated for the best LP/CRP for the separate searches case (notches withdrawn, 40 total notches) for each burnup step (kWd/kg)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Constraint values as a function of burnup for the best LP/CRP for the coupled searches (constraint limits shown with horizontal lines)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

CRPs generated for the coupled LP/CRP search (notches withdrawn, 40 total notches) for each burnup step (kWd/kg)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In