0
Special Section Papers

Nozzle Geometry Effect on Stratified Layer Erosion by Vertical Turbulent Jet

[+] Author and Article Information
L. Ishay, G. Ziskind

Heat Transfer Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev,
P.O.B. 653,
Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel

U. Bieder

CEA,
DEN/SAC/DANS/DM2S/STMF/LMSF,
Gif sur Yvette 91191, France

A. Rashkovan

Physics Department,
NRCN,
P.O.B. 9001,
Beer-Sheva 84190, Israel
e-mail: rashbgu@gmail.com

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received September 18, 2016; final manuscript received January 3, 2017; published online May 25, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Ilan Yaar.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 3(3), 030902 (May 25, 2017) (11 pages) Paper No: NERS-16-1105; doi: 10.1115/1.4035693 History: Received September 18, 2016; Revised January 03, 2017

Knowledge of the nuclear power plants (NPPs) containment atmosphere composition in the course of a severe accident is crucial for the effective design and positioning of the hydrogen explosion countermeasures. This composition strongly depends on containment flows which may include turbulent jet mixing in the presence of buoyancy, jet impingement onto the stratified layer, stable stratification layer erosion, steam condensation on the walls of the containment, condensation by emergency spray systems and other processes. Thus, in modeling of containment flows, it is essential to correctly predict these effects. In particular, a proper prediction of the turbulent jet behavior before it reaches the stably stratified layer is critical for the correct prediction of its mixing and impingement. Accordingly, validation study is presented for free neutral and buoyancy-affected turbulent jets, based on well-known experimental results from the literature. This study allows for the choice of a proper turbulence model to be applied for containment flow simulations. Furthermore, the jet behavior strongly depends on the issuing geometry. A comparative study of erosion process for the conditions similar to the ones of international benchmark exercise (IBE-3) is presented for different jet nozzle shapes.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Agrawal, N. , Prabhakar, A. , and Das, S. K. , 2015, “ Hydrogen Distribution in Nuclear Reactor Containment During Accidents and Associated Heat and Mass Transfer Issues—A Review,” Heat Transfer Eng., 36(10), pp. 859–879. [CrossRef]
Marshall, B. W. , 1986, “ Hydrogen: Air: Steam Flammability Limits and Combustion Characteristics in the FITS Vessel,” Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. NUREG/CR-3468, SAND84 -0383, R3.
Bentaib, A. , Meynet, N. , and Bleyer, A. , 2015, “ Overview on Hydrogen Risk Research and Development Activities: Methodology and Open Issues,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 47(1), pp. 26–32. [CrossRef]
Koroll, G. W. , Lau, D. W. P. , Dewit, W. A. , and Graham, W. R. C. , 1995, “ Catalytic Hydrogen Recombination for Nuclear Containment,” Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, MB, Canada, AECL Report No. CA9800140.
Jakel, C. , Kelm, S. , Reinecke, E. A. , Verfondern, K. , and Allelein, H. J. , 2014, “ Validation Strategy for CFD Models Describing Safety-Relevant Scenarios Including LH2/GH2 Release and the Use of Passive Auto-Catalytic Recombiners,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 39(35), pp. 20371–20377. [CrossRef]
Karwat, H. , Bardelay, J. , Hashimoto, T. , Koroll, G. W. , Krause, M. , L'Hériteau, J. P. , Lundström, P. , Notafrancesco, A. , Royl, P. , Schwinges, B. , Tezuka, H. , and Tills, J. , 1999, “ SOAR on Containment Thermalhydraulics and Hydrogen Distribution,” OECD/NEA, Report No. NEA/CSNI/R(1999)16.
Ishay, L. , Bieder, U. , Ziskind, G. , and Rashkovan, A. , 2015, “ Turbulent Jet Erosion of a Stably Stratified Gas Layer in a Nuclear Reactor Test Containment,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 292, pp. 138–148. [CrossRef]
Mi, J. , Nathan, G. J. , and Luxtun, R. E. , 2000, “ Centreline Mixing Characteristics of Jets From Nine Differently Shaped Nozzles,” Exp. Fluids, 28(1), pp. 93–94. [CrossRef]
Launder, B. E. , and Spalding, D. B. , 1974, “ The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 3(2), pp. 269–289. [CrossRef]
Studer, E. , Brinster, J. , Tkatschenko, I. , Mignot, G. , Paladino, D. , and Andreani, M. , 2012, “ Interaction of a Light Gas Stratified Layer With an Air Jet Coming From Below: Large Scale Experiments and Scaling Issues,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 253, pp. 406–412. [CrossRef]
Ishay, L. , Ziskind, G. , Bieder, U. , and Rashkovan, A. , 2015, “ Nuclear Reactor Containment Flows—Modelling of Stably Stratified Layer Erosion by a Turbulent Jet,” NURETH-16: The 16th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, Chicago, IL, Aug. 30–Sept. 4.
Hussein, H. J. , Capp, S. P. , and George, W. K. , 1994,“ Velocity Measurements in a High-Reynolds-Number, Momentum-Conserving, Axisymmetric, Turbulent Jet,” J. Fluid Mech., 258, pp. 31–75. [CrossRef]
George, W. K. , 1989, “ The Self-Preservation of Turbulent Flows and its Relation to Initial Conditions and Coherent Structures,” Advances in Turbulence, Hemisphere, New York, pp. 39–73.
Uddin, M. , and Pollard, A. , 2007, “ Self-Similarity of Coflowing Jets: The Virtual Origin,” Phys. Fluids, 19(6), p. 068103. [CrossRef]
Xu, G. , and Antonia, R. A. , 2002, “ Effect of Different Initial Conditions on a Turbulent Round Free Jet,” Exp. Fluids, 33(5), pp. 677–693. [CrossRef]
Mi, J. , Nathan, G. J. , and Nobes, D. S. , 2001, “ Mixing Characteristics of Axisymmetric Free Jets From a Contoured Nozzle, an Orifice Plate and a Pipe,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 123(4), pp. 878–883. [CrossRef]
Capp, S. P. , 1983, “ Experimental Investigation of the Turbulent Axisymmetric Jet,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Pope, S. B. , 1978, “ An Explanation of the Turbulent Round-Jet/Plane-Jet Anomaly,” AIAA J., 16(3), pp. 279–281. [CrossRef]
Ouellette, P. , and Hill, P. G. , 2000, “ Turbulent Transient Gas Injections,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 122(4), pp. 743–753. [CrossRef]
Dowling, D. R. , and Dimotakis, P. E. , 1990, “ Similarity of the Concentration Field of Gas-Phase Turbulent Jets,” J. Fluid Mech., 218, pp. 109–141. [CrossRef]
Dowling, D. R. , 1988, “ Mixing in Gas Phase Turbulent Jets,” Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, pp. 1–267.
Dahm, W. A. , and Dimotakis, P. E. , 1987, “ Measurements of Entrainment and Mixing in Turbulent Jets,” AIAA J., 25(9), pp. 1216–1223. [CrossRef]
Becker, H. A. , Hottel, H. C. , and Williams, G. C. , 1967, “ The Nozzle-Fluid Concentration Field of the Round, Turbulent, Free Jet,” J. Fluid Mech., 30(2), pp. 285–303. [CrossRef]
Dahm, W. A. , 1985, “ Experiments on Entrainment, Mixing and Chemical Reaction in Turbulent Jets at Large Schmidt Number,” Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
Corrsin, S. , and Uberoi, M. S. , 1950, “ Further Experiments on the Flow and Heat Transfer in a Heated Turbulent Air Jet,” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Report No. 998.
Papanicolaou, P. N. , and List, E. J. , 1988, “ Investigations of Round Vertical Turbulent Buoyant Jets,” J. Fluid Mech., 195, pp. 341–391. [CrossRef]
Fischer, H. B. , List, E. J. , Koh, R. C. Y. , Imberger, J. , and Brooks, N. H. , 1979, Mixing in Inland and Coastal Waters, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 315–389.
Andreani, M. , Badillo, A. , and Kapulla, R. , 2014, “ Synthesis of the OECD/NEA-PSI CFD Benchmark Exercise,” CFD4NRS-5 Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, Sept. 9–11.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Numerical model overview: (a) computational domain for free nozzle jet simulations and (b) grid at the nozzle outlet. Left: fine high y+ grid and right: coarse high y+ grid.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Contraction nozzle jet centerline velocity decay rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Contraction nozzle jet normalized turbulent kinetic energy

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Geometry of an axisymmetric computational domain for free turbulent jet issuing from a contraction nozzle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Concentration distribution—comparison with experiments by Dowling and Dimotakis [20]: (a) radial concentration for x/d = 30, (b) normalized radial concentration: comparison with additional experiments, and (c) centerline concentration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Geometry of an axisymmetric computational domain for positively buoyant jets. Dimensions are scaled for d = 0.75 cm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Calculated results of EXP23 from Papanicolaou and List [26]. Turbulence model impact on: (a) jet centerline nondimensional velocity and (b) jet centerline nondimensional concentration.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Buoyancy-affected turbulent jets—predictions with C1ε = 1.52 for different initial jet buoyancy and momentum fluxes (see Table 3 for a key to the legend): (a) jet centerline nondimensional velocity and (b) jet centerline nondimensional concentration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Time history of helium concentration for ten measuring points along the jet axis. Pipe jet—dashed lines, nozzle jet—solid lines.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Erosion rate—time to reach helium mole fraction of 0.2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Average axial velocity profiles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Contours of velocity and helium mole fraction at t = 110 s: (a) Velocity magnitude, m/s. Pipe (right) and nozzle (left) jets and (b) helium mole fraction. Pipe (right) and nozzle (left) jets.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In