0
research-article

Thermal-hydraulic design in the transition flow regime

[+] Author and Article Information
Jorgelina Lupiano Contreras

INVAP S.E., Comandante Luis Piedrabuena 4950, 8400 San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina
JLupianoContreras@invap.com.ar

Alicia Doval

INVAP S.E., Comandante Luis Piedrabuena 4950, 8400 San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina
Doval@invap.com.ar

Patricio Alberto

INVAP S.E., Comandante Luis Piedrabuena 4950, 8400 San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina
PAAlberto@invap.com.ar

1Corresponding author.

ASME doi:10.1115/1.4042363 History: Received August 01, 2018; Revised December 13, 2018

Abstract

Difficulties are experienced during the thermal-hydraulic design of a nuclear reactor operating in the transition flow regime and are the result of the inability to accurately predict the heat transfer coefficient. Experimental values for the heat transfer coefficient in rectangular channels are compared with the calculated by correlations usually used for the design of MTR Reactors. The values predicted by Gnielinski and Kreith correlations at Re<5000 are not necesarily conservative. The Al-Arabi-Churchill correlation with the correction proposed by Jones has proved to be conservative for Reynolds between 2100 and 5000. Two alternative design approaches are proposed to solve a specific thermal-hydraulic design problem for an MTR reactor operating at Reynolds 2500. The conservative approach comprises two alternatives: the use of Al-Arabi correlation with no uncertainty factors, as it has proved to be conservative, or the use of Kreith correlation with a maximum uncertainty. In this conservative approach, maximum deviations in other input parameters are also taken into account. The best estimate plus uncertainty approach (BEPU) considers an uncertainty distribution in input parameters to generate a random sample of 59 inputs. An uncertainty distribution based on the ratio between the experimental and the calculated heat transfer coefficient, when using Kreith correlation, is considered. Results are given in terms of maximum and minimum bounds for the figure of merit used as design criterion with 95% probability and 95% confidence level. The BEPU approach offers a less penalizing design and its use depends on regulator's acceptance.

Copyright (c) 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In