Flow control valves may experience localized cavitation when the local static pressure drops to the liquid vapor pressure. Localized damage to the valve and surrounding area can occur when the vapor cavity collapses. Valve designs that reduce cavitation are based on empirical evidence and accumulated experience, but there are still considerable cavitation problems in industry. Valve designers may use computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate cavitation in flow control valves, but model validation is challenging because there are limited data of local cavitation from the valve surface. Typically, the intensity of cavitation in a control valve is inferred from measurements of observable side effects of cavitation such as valve noise, vibration, or damage to the valve assembly. Such an indirect approach to characterizing cavitation yields little information about the location, degree, and extent of the cavitation flow field that can be used in CFD validation studies. This study uses 3D X-ray computed tomography (CT) imaging to visualize cavitation from a 5.1 cm diameter butterfly valve and compares the resulting vapor cloud to that predicted by CFD simulations. Qualitative comparisons reveal that the resulting cavitation structures are captured by the simulations when a small amount of non-condensable gas is introduced into the fluid and the simulations are completed in a transient mode.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME-JSME-KSME 2011 Joint Fluids Engineering Conference
July 24–29, 2011
Hamamatsu, Japan
Conference Sponsors:
- Fluids Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4441-0
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Cavitation From a Butterfly Valve: Comparing 3D Simulations to 3D X-Ray Computed Tomography Flow Visualization
Graham Brett,
Graham Brett
Fisher Controls International, LLC, Marshalltown, IA
Search for other works by this author on:
Marc Riveland,
Marc Riveland
Fisher Controls International, LLC, Marshalltown, IA
Search for other works by this author on:
Terrence C. Jensen,
Terrence C. Jensen
Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Search for other works by this author on:
Theodore J. Heindel
Theodore J. Heindel
Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Search for other works by this author on:
Graham Brett
Fisher Controls International, LLC, Marshalltown, IA
Marc Riveland
Fisher Controls International, LLC, Marshalltown, IA
Terrence C. Jensen
Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Theodore J. Heindel
Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Paper No:
AJK2011-33003, pp. 161-169; 9 pages
Published Online:
May 25, 2012
Citation
Brett, G, Riveland, M, Jensen, TC, & Heindel, TJ. "Cavitation From a Butterfly Valve: Comparing 3D Simulations to 3D X-Ray Computed Tomography Flow Visualization." Proceedings of the ASME-JSME-KSME 2011 Joint Fluids Engineering Conference. ASME-JSME-KSME 2011 Joint Fluids Engineering Conference: Volume 2, Fora. Hamamatsu, Japan. July 24–29, 2011. pp. 161-169. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/AJK2011-33003
Download citation file:
20
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
URANS Models for the Simulation of Full Load Pressure Surge in Francis Turbines Validated by Particle Image Velocimetry
J. Fluids Eng (December,2017)
Cloud Cavitating Flow Over a Submerged Axisymmetric Projectile and Comparison Between Two-Dimensional RANS and Three-Dimensional Large-Eddy Simulation Methods
J. Fluids Eng (June,2016)
Flow Dynamics in the Aortic Arch and Its Effect on the Arterial Input Function in Cardiac Computed Tomography
J Biomech Eng (October,2019)
Related Chapters
CFD Simulation of Thermodynamic Effect Using a Homogeneous Cavitation Model Based on Method of Moments
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
Cavitating Structures at Inception in Turbulent Shear Flow
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
Experimental Characterization of a Cavitating Orifice
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)