A new specimen for determining the local stress-strain response of foams under uniaxial compression is presented along with the corresponding theory. The drawback of using conventional cubic specimens is that average stresses and strains are calculated, which introduces size effects due to structural and material inhomogeneities of commercial foams. Under compression, foam cubes develop unstable regimes, which involve localized deformation. The instabilities cause difficulties in establishing the correct stress-strain response of the material. Tapering specimens can enable controlled motion of the boundary separating the unstable and stable regimes. This concept is exploited in the present paper in experiments on closed-cell aluminum foam trapezoids. A crushing front propagates down the tapered specimen during compression, while the deformed region develops a new lateral shape. The experimental results are used along with several assumptions to extract a more representative stress-strain response of foam. The response is characterized by the initial plateau stress, shape exponent and densification strain. The significant effect of the variable Poisson’s ratio during crushing is also introduced. The results provide a basis for developing local constitutive behavior of foams.

1.
Andrews
,
E. W.
,
Gioux
,
G.
,
Onck
,
P.
, and
Gibson
,
L. J.
,
2001
, “
Size Effects in Ductile Cellular Foams. Part II: Experimental Results
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
43
, p.
701
701
.
2.
Wierzbicki, T., 1997, “Experimental, Numerical and Analytical Study of Honeycomb Material,” Report No. 1: Joint MIT/Industry Ultralight Consortium, Impact and Crashworthiness Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MA, Nov.
3.
Hanssen, A. G., Hopperstad, O. S., Langseth, M., and Ilstad, H., 2000, “Validation of Constitutive Models Applicable to Aluminum Foams,” Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
4.
Wierzbicki, T., Doyoyo, M., and Markaki, A., 2001, “Redefining the Concept of Stress-Strain Curve for Foams,” Cellular Metals and Metal Foaming Technology, Ed.: J. Banhart, M. Ashby, and N. Fleck, eds., Verlag MIT Publishing, Germany, pp. 449–453.
5.
Bastawros
,
A. F.
, and
Evans
,
A. G.
, 2000, “Deformation Heterogeneity in Cellular Al Alloys,” Adv. Eng. Mat., 4, p. 210.
6.
Doyoyo, M., and Wierzbicki, T., 2000, “Fracture of Aluminum Honeycombs and Foams Under Hemi-spherical Punch Indentation,” Report No. 38: Joint MIT/Industry Ultralight Consortium, Impact and Crashworthiness Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MA, June.
7.
Marciniak, 1965, private communication.
8.
McClintock
,
F. A.
, and
Zheng
,
Z. M.
,
1993
, “
Ductile Fracture in Sheets Under Transverse Strain Gradients
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
64
, p.
321
321
.
9.
Doyoyo, M., and Wierzbicki, T., 2002, “Measurement of the Failure Surface for Ductile and Brittle Foams,” Plasticity, Damage and Fracture at Macro, Micro and Nano Scales, A. Khan and O. Lopez-Pamies, eds., Neat Press, pp. 114–116.
10.
Doyoyo, M., and Wierzbicki, T., 2002, “Experimental Studies on Yield Behavior of Ductile and Brittle Aluminum Foams Under a Biaxial State of Stress,” Int. J. Plast., in press.
11.
Gibson, L. J., and Ashby, M. F., 1997, Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
12.
Malvern, L. E., 1969, Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Media, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
You do not currently have access to this content.