0
Research Papers

Monte Carlo Simulation of Inclined Reactivity Control Rod and Boron Poisoning for the Canadian-SCWR Supercell

[+] Author and Article Information
Haykel Raouafi

Department of Engineering Physics,
Nuclear Engineering Institute, École Polytechnique de Montréal,
C.P. 6079, succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3A7, Canada
e-mail: haykel.raouafi@polymtl.ca

Guy Marleau

Department of Engineering Physics,
Nuclear Engineering Institute, École Polytechnique de Montréal,
C.P. 6079, succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3A7, Canada
e-mail: guy.marleau@polymtl.ca

Manuscript received March 27, 2015; final manuscript received June 17, 2015; published online February 29, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Thomas Schulenberg.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 2(2), 021015 (Feb 29, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: NERS-15-1032; doi: 10.1115/1.4030895 History: Received March 27, 2015; Accepted June 22, 2015

The Canadian-SCWR is a heavy-water moderated supercritical light-water-cooled pressure tube reactor. It is fueled with CANada deuterium uranium (CANDU)-type bundles (62 elements) containing a mixture of thorium and plutonium oxides. Because the pressure tubes are vertical, the upper region of the core is occupied by the inlet and outlet headers render it nearly impossible to insert vertical control rods in the core from the top. Insertion of solid control devices from the bottom of the core is possible, but this option was initially rejected because it was judged impractical. The option that is proposed here is to use inclined control rods that are inserted from the side of the reactor and benefit from the gravitational pull exerted on them. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the neutronic performance of the proposed inclined control rods. To achieve this goal, we first develop a three-dimensional (3D) supercell model to simulate an inclined rod located between four vertical fuel cells. Simulations are performed with the SERPENT Monte Carlo code at five axial positions in the reactor to evaluate the effect of coolant temperature and density, which varies substantially with core height, on the reactivity worth of the control rods. The effect of modifying the inclination and spatial position of the control rod inside the supercell is then analyzed. Finally, we evaluate how boron poisoning of the moderator affects their effectiveness.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Pencer, J., Watts, D., Colton, A., Wang, X., Blomeley, L., Anghel, V., and Yue, S., 2013, “Core Neutronics for the Canadian-SCWR Conceptual Design,” Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactors (ISSCWR-6), China Nuclear Energy Association, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
U.S. DOE Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee and the Generation IV International Forum, 2002, “A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems,” United States Department of Energy, Washington, DC, Tech. Rep. GIF-002-00.
Yamada, K., Sakurai, S., Asanuma, Y., Hamazaki, R., Ishiwatari, Y., and Kitoh, K., 2011, “Overview of the Japanese SCWR Concept Developed Under the GIF Collaboration,” Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactors (ISSCWR-5), Canadian Nuclear Society, Vancouver, Canada.
Schulenberg, T., and Starflinger, J., 2012, High Performance Light Water Reactor: Design and Analyses, KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Shan, J., Chen, W., Rheea, W. B., and Leung, L. K. H., 2010, “Coupled Neutronics/Thermalhydraulics Analysis of CANDU-SCWR Fuel Channel,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 37(1), pp. 58–65. 10.1016/j.anucene.2009.09.016
Ian, L., 2010, “CANDU Design and Equipment Overview,” Proceedings of AECL CANDU Supply Chain Forum, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Saskatoon, Canada.
Ahmad, A., Cao, L., and Wu, H., 2014, “Coupled Analysis and Improvements for Canadian-SCWR Core Design,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 268, pp. 104–112. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.12.045
Samuel, J., 2011, “Conceptual Design for a Re-entrant Type Fuel Channel for Supercritical Water-Cooled Nuclear Reactors,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Ontario, Canada.
Chow, C. K., and Khartabil, H. F., 2008, “Conceptual Fuel Channel Designs for CANDU-SCWR,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 40(2), pp. 139–146. 10.5516/NET.2008.40.2.139
Wang, X., Colton, A., and O’Kane, M. M., 2013, “Investigation of Neutron Absorbers for Reactivity Control and Shutdown Systems for the Canadian Super Critical Water Reactor (SCWR),” Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada, Tech. Rep. 217-123700-440-008.
Rhee, B. W., Jeong, C. J., Yun, H. J., and Jang, D. S., 2002, “A CFD Model for High Pressure Liquid Poison Injection for CANDU-6 Shutdown System No. 2,” Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp. 195–203.
Rhee, B. W., Jeong, C. J., Choi, J. H., and Yoo, S. Y., 2002, “Development and Validation of a Model for High Pressure Liquid Poison Injection for CANDU-6 Shutdown System No. 2,” Proceedings of 22nd Canadian Nuclear Society Nuclear Simulation Symposium, Canadian Nuclear Society, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Raouafi, H., and Marleau, G., 2014, “A Simplified 3D DRAGON Simulation of an Inclined Reactivity Control Device for the Canadian-SCWR,” Proceedings of 19th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference (PBNC-2014), Canadian Nuclear Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Grant, C., Mollerach, R., Leszczynski, F., Serra, O., Marconi, J., and Fink, J., 2006, “Validation of Updated Neutronic Calculation Models Proposed for Atucha-II PHWR. Part II: Benchmark Comparisons of PUMA Core Parameters with MCNP5 & Improvements Due to a Simple Cell Heterogeneity Correction,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Nuclear Analysis and Simulation (PHYSOR-2006), Canadian Nuclear Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Leppänen, J., 2013, “PSG2/Serpent: A Continuous-Energy Monte Carlo Reactor Physics Burnup Calculation Code,” Serpent User’s Manual, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland.
Marleau, G., Harrisson, G., Raouafi, H., Rouchon, A., and Benguedouar, T., 2012, “Evaluation of the 2-D Benchmark Using SERPENT, TRIPOLI and DRAGON,” École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, Canada, Tech. Rep. IGE-333.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Cross-sectional view of the 62-elements Canadian-SCWR fuel cell cluster

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

3D Canadian-SCWR supercell (left) and the bottom x−y plane two-dimensional projection (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

3D geometry of control rod (right) and its solid guide tube (left)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Boundary conditions: (a) periodic boundary conditions and (b) reflective boundary conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of inclination of control rod on multiplication factor (keff): (a) keff variations with inclination angle, (b) keff variations with control rod volume (0–45 deg inclination), and (c) keff variations with control rod volume (90–45 deg inclination)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of axial position of control rod on multiplication factor keff: (a) as a function of displacement along the y-axis, (b) as a function of displacement along the z-axis, and (c) as a function of rod volume inside the supercell

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of boron poisoning on multiplication factor keff: (a) keff with control rod inserted and (b) keff with control rod withdrawn

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In