Special Section Papers

Safety Improvement to Israel Research Reactor 2 by Increasing the Robustness of Equipment to Ground Acceleration

[+] Author and Article Information
A. Biton

NRCN Beer-Sheva,
P.O. Box 9001,
Beer-Seva 84190, Israel
e-mail: almogbiton10@gmail.com

Y. Soffer, R. Freud

NRCN Beer-Sheva,
P.O. Box 9001,
Beer-Seva 84190, Israel

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received August 6, 2016; final manuscript received December 19, 2016; published online May 25, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Ilan Yaar.

ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci 3(3), 030915 (May 25, 2017) (3 pages) Paper No: NERS-16-1088; doi: 10.1115/1.4035568 History: Received August 06, 2016; Revised December 19, 2016

Nuclear facilities and in particular nuclear reactors are designed to withstand ground acceleration due to earthquake and to maintain the structures, systems, and components (SSC) safety function. The three main safety functions are shutdown, removal of residual heat, and indications of the first two. Achieving these three functions will be called a “safe path.” The Israel Research Reactor 2 (IRR2) has numerous diverse safe paths to ensure the availability of these three safety functions. Each safe path has an associated level of resistance to ground acceleration. A project for increasing the robustness of equipment to ground acceleration was initiated in order to improve the safety of the reactor and to comply with regulatory guidelines.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Topics: Safety , Robustness , Heat
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Kelly, J. M. , 1982, “ The Influence of Base Isolation on the Seismic Response of Light Secondary Equipments,” Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, Report No. UCB/EERC-81/17.
Hall, D. , 1983, “ The Use of Base Isolation and Energy-Absorbing Restrainers for the Seismic Protection of a Large Power Plant Component,” Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, Report No. EPRI NP-29.
Ebisawa, K. , Ando, K. , and Shibata, K. , 2000, “ Progress of a Research Program on Seismic Base Isolation of Nuclear Components,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 198(1–2), pp. 61–74. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic description of support channels to electrical cabin calculation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Electric breakers hall model design

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Different types of supports. The left side of the figure presents the design model of the support channels, side support channels, and reinforcement flat panels and the right side presents the actual implementation.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Diesel-generator and seismically reinforced frames for UPS batteries



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In