Advanced electronics packaging technologies such as chip scale packages, fine pitch ball grid arrays, and flip chip are pushing solder paste stencil printing to the limit. In order to achieve solder print deposits of the sizes required for emerging electronic packaging technology, a rigorous understanding of the process is required. This paper seeks to expand our understanding of the physical characteristics of stencil printing specifically focusing on the solder paste release process based on experimental and analytical approaches. First, designed experiments were conducted to identify the main process variables affecting final print quality. An in-situ measurement system using a high speed imaging system monitored the solder paste release process. Based on experimental observations, different modes of solder paste release and their corresponding mechanisms were identified. A model was developed to predict print quality for fine pitch applications. The proposed model was experimentally verified showing good agreement with measured values for fine pitch and very fine pitch printing. It was found that the cohesive and adhesive forces acting on the paste tend to govern the release process rather than the viscous and inertial forces.

1.
Ekere
N.
, and
He
D.
,
1996
, “
The Performance of Vibrating Squeegee in the Stencil Printing of Solder Pastes
,”
Journal of Electronics Manufacturing
, Vol.
6
, pp.
261
270
.
2.
Ekere
N. N.
,
Ismail
E. K.
, and
Mannan
S. H.
,
1993
, “
Experimental Study Of Stencil/Substrate Separation Speed In On-Contact Solder Paste Printing for Reflow Soldering
,”
Journal of Electronic Manufacturing
, Vol.
3
, pp.
25
29
.
3.
Ekere, N. N., Mannan, S. H., and Currie, M. A., 1995, “Solder Paste Printing Process Modeling Map,” Proceedings, IEEE/CPMT 18th International Electronics Symposium, Omiya, Japan, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ.
4.
Evans
J. W.
, and
Beddow
J. K.
,
1987
, “
Characterization of Particle Morphology and Rheological Behavior in Solder Paste
,”
IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids and Manufacturing Technology
, Vol.
10
, No.
2
, pp.
224
231
.
5.
Hanrahan, T. F., Monaghan, P. F., and Babikian, R. D., 1992, “Modeling of a Solder Paste Flow with a Free Surface in Stencil Printing,” Advances in Electronic Packaging, ASME, New York, pp. 587–592.
6.
Haslehurtst
L.
, and
Ekere
N. N.
,
1996
, “
Parameter Interactions in Stencil Printing of Solder Paste
,”
Journal of Electronics Manufacturing
, Vol.
6
, No.
4
, pp.
307
316
.
7.
Li
Y.
,
Mahajan
R. L.
,
Nikmanesh
N.
,
1996
, “
Fine Pitch Stencil Printing Process Modeling and Optimization
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
118
, pp.
1
6
.
8.
Mannan
S. H.
,
Ekere
N.
,
Ismail
I.
, and
Lo
K.
,
1994
, “
Squeegee Deformation Study in the stencil Printing of Solder Pastes
,”
IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids and Manufacturing Technology
, Vol.
17
, No.
3
, pp.
470
475
.
9.
Mannan, S. H., Ekere, N. N., Ismail, E. K., and Currie, M. A., 1995, “Flow Processes in Solder Paste During Stencil Printing for SMT Assembly,” Journal of Material Science, p. 34–42.
10.
Mannan
S.
,
Ekere
N.
,
Ismail
I.
, and
Currie
M.
,
1994
, “
Computer Simulation of Solder Paste Flow Part I: Dense Suspension Theory
,”
Journal of Electronics Manufacturing
, Vol.
4
, pp.
141
147
.
11.
Mannan
S.
,
Ekere
N.
,
Ismail
I.
, and
Currie
M.
,
1994
, “
Computer Simulation of Solder Paste Flow Part II: Flow out of a Stencil Aperture
,”
Journal of Electronics Manufacturing
, Vol.
4
, pp.
149
154
.
12.
Montgomery, D. C., Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley, New York, 1997
13.
Morris
J. R.
, and
Wojcik
T.
,
1991
, “
Stencil Printing of Solder Paste for Fine-Pitch Surface Mount Assembly
,”
IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids and Manufacturing Technology
, Vol.
14
, No.
3
, pp.
560
566
.
14.
Owczarek
J. A.
, and
Howland
F. L.
,
1990
, “
A Study of the Off-Contact Screen Printing Process—Part I: Analysis of the Model of the Printing Process and Some Results Derived From Experiments
,”
IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids and Manufacturing Technology
, Vol.
13
, No.
2
, pp.
358
367
.
15.
Owczarek
J. A.
, and
Howland
F. L.
,
1990
, “
A Study of the Off-Contact Screen Printing Process—Part II: Analysis of the Model of the Printing Process
,”
IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids and Manufacturing Technology
, Vol.
13
, No.
2
, pp.
368
375
.
16.
Revelino, D., 1997, “Achieving Single Digit DPMO in SMT Processes,” Proceedings, Surface Mount International, Sept 7–11, San Jose, California, Surface Mount Technology Association (SMTA), Edina, MN, pp. 697–702.
17.
Riemer
D. E.
,
1988
, “
Analytical Engineering Model of the Screen Printing Process: Part I
,”
Solid State Technology
, Vol.
31
, No.
8
, pp.
107
111
.
18.
Riemer
D. E.
,
1988
, “
Analytical Engineering Model of the Screen Printing Process: Part II
,”
Solid State Technology
, Vol.
31
, No.
9
, pp.
85
90
.
19.
Riemer, D., 1987, “The Shear and Flow Experience of Ink During Screen Printing,” Proceedings, 1987 International Symposium on Microelectronics, Minneapolis, MN, September, International Society of Hybrids and Microcircuits (ISHM), Reston, VA, p. 335–40.
20.
Sahay
C.
,
Head
L. M.
,
Shereen
R.
,
Dujari
P.
,
Constable
J. H.
, and
Westby
G.
,
1995
, “
Study of Print Release Process in Solder Paste Printing
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
117
, pp.
230
234
.
21.
Zimon, A., 1982, “Adhesion of Dust and Powder,” report, All-Union Scientific-Research Institute of the Food Industry, Consultants Bureau, Moscow, USSR.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.