The effectiveness of passive flow-control devices in eliminating high surface rms pressure fluctuations at the junction of several idealized wing/body junction flows was studied. Wall-pressure fluctuation measurements were made using microphones along the line of symmetry at the wing/body junction of six different wing shapes. The wings were mounted on the wind tunnel floor at a zero degree angle-of-attack. The six wing shapes tested were: a 3:2 semi-elliptical-nosed NACA 0020 tailed generic body shape (Rood wing), a parallel center-body model, a tear-drop model, a Sandia 1850 model, and NACA 0015 and NACA 0012 airfoil shapes. Eight different fence configurations were tested with the Rood wing. The two double-fence configurations were found to be the most effective in reducing the pressure fluctuations. Two of the single fence types were nearly as effective and were simpler to manufacture and test. For this reason one of these single fence types was selected for testing with all of the other wing models. The best fence flow-control devices were found to reduce rms wall-pressure fluctuations by at least 61% relative to the baseline cases.

1.
Baker
,
C. J.
, 1980, “
The Turbulent Horseshoe Vortex
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
0167-6105,
6
, pp.
9
23
.
2.
Rood
,
E. P.
, and
Keller
,
J. E.
, 1984, “
Evidence of Large Scale Time Dependent Flow in the Wingwall Interaction Wake
,” in
Unsteady Turbulent Boundary Layers and Friction, FGD
, Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., Fluids Eng. Div., New York, Vol.
12
, pp.
39
44
.
3.
Simpson
,
R. L.
, 1996, “
Aspects of Turbulent Boundary Layer Separation
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
0376-0421,
32
, pp.
457
521
.
4.
Simpson
,
R. L.
, 2001, “
Junction Flows
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
0066-4189,
33
, pp.
415
443
.
5.
Devenport
,
W. J.
, and
Simpson
,
R. L.
, 1990, “
Time-Dependent and Time-Averaged Turbulence Structure Near the Nose of a Wing-Body Junction
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
210
, pp.
23
55
.
6.
Devenport
,
W. J.
, and
Simpson
,
R. L.
, 1992, “
Flow Past a Wing-Body Junction: Experimental Evaluation of Turbulence Models
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
30
, pp.
873
881
.
7.
Ölçmen
,
M. S.
, and
Simpson
,
R. L.
, 1994, “
Influence of Wing Shapes on Surface Pressure Fluctuations at Wing-Body Junctions
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
32
, pp.
6
15
.
8.
Kim
,
S. A.
,
Walker
,
D. A.
, and
Simpson
,
R. L.
, 1991, “
Observation and Measurements of Flow Structures in the Stagnation Region of a Wing-Body Junction
,” VPI&SU Rep. VPI-E-91-20, Va. Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg.
9.
Lewis
,
D. J.
,
Simpson
,
R. L.
, and
Diller
,
T. E.
, 1993, “
Time-resolved Surface Heat Flux Measurements in the Wing/Body Junction Vortex
,”
J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer
0887-8722,
8
, pp.
656
663
.
10.
Ölçmen
,
M. S.
, and
Simpson
,
R. L.
, 1995, “
An Experimental Study of Three-Dimensional Pressure-Driven Turbulent Boundary Layer
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
290
, pp.
225
262
.
11.
Ölçmen
,
M. S.
, and
Simpson
,
R. L.
, 1996, “
Experimental Transport-Rate Budgets in Complex Three-Dimensional Turbulent Flows at a Wing/Body Junction
,”
27th Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. Fluid Dyn. Conf.
, New Orleans, AIAA-96-2035.
12.
Ölçmen
,
M. S.
, and
Simpson
,
R. L.
, 1997, “
Experimental Evaluation of Turbulence Diffusion Models in Complex 3-D Flow Near a Wing/Body Junction
,”
35th Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. Aerosp. Sci. Meet.
, Reno, NV, AIAA-97-0650.
13.
Ölçmen
,
M. S.
, and
Simpson
,
R. L.
, 1997, “
Some Features of a Turbulent Wing-Body Junction Vortical Flow
,”
AIAA-97-0651, 35th AIAA, Aerosp. Sci. Meet.
, Reno, NV.
14.
Devenport
,
W. J.
,
Agarwal
,
N. K.
,
Dewitz
,
M. B.
,
Simpson
,
R. L.
, and
Poddar
,
K.
, 1990, “
Effects of a Fillet on the Flow Past a Wing-Body Junction
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
28
, pp.
2017
2024
.
15.
Devenport
,
W. J.
,
Dewitz
,
M. B.
,
Agarwal
,
N. K.
, and
Simpson
,
R. L.
, 1992, “
Effects of a Leading-Edge Fillet on the Flow Past an Appendage-Body Junction
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
30
, pp.
2177
2183
.
16.
Barberis
,
D.
,
Molton
,
P.
, and
Malaterre
,
T.
, 1998, “
Control of 3D Turbulent Boundary Layer Separation Caused by a Wing-Body Junction
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
0894-1777,
16
, pp.
54
63
.
17.
Abbott
,
I. H.
, and
von Doenhoff
,
A. E.
, 1949,
Theory of Wing Sections: Including a Summary of Airfoil Data
,
McGraw Hill
.
18.
Ölçmen
,
M. S.
, and
Simpson
,
R. L.
, 1992, “
Influence of Wing Shapes on the Surface Pressure Fluctuations of a Wing-Body Junction
,”
Aerosp. Sci. Meet., 30th
, Reno., NV, AIAA-92-0433.
19.
Agarwal
,
N. K.
, and
Simpson
,
R. L.
, 1989, “
A New Technique for Obtaining the Turbulent Pressure Spectrum From the Surface Pressure Spectrum
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
135
(
2
), pp.
346
350
.
20.
Simpson
,
R. L.
,
Ghodbane
,
M.
, and
McGrath
,
B. E.
, 1987, “
An Experimental Study of Surface Pressure Fluctuations in a Separating Turbulent Boundary Layer
,” NASA CR-178309.
21.
Ölçmen
,
M. S.
,
Simpson
,
R. L.
,
Kim
,
S.
, and
Ha
,
S. M.
, 1991, “
Some Effects of Appendage Shape and a Fence Control Device on Appendage/Hull Junction Flows
,” VPI-AOE-183, Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Department, VPI&SU.
You do not currently have access to this content.