Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
NARROW
Date
Availability
1-20 of 62513
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Journal:
Journal of Fluids Engineering
Article Type: Research-Article
J. Fluids Eng. December 2022, 144(12): 121204.
Paper No: FE-22-1183
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Journal Articles
Journal:
Journal of Fluids Engineering
Article Type: Research-Article
J. Fluids Eng. December 2022, 144(12): 121302.
Paper No: FE-22-1222
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Image
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Fig. 1 The rectangular domain and velocity boundary conditions for the problem described by Eqs. (1) – (3) More
Image
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Fig. 2 Comparison of u velocity profiles with experiment for the r = 0 case. ( a ) Measurements scaled with σ o determined by fitting to the EFS (dashed line) as calculated by Forliti et al. [ 23 ] (squares), Liepmann and Laufer [ 24 ] (triangles), and Wygnanski and Fiedler [ 25 ] (circle... More
Image
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Fig. 3 Effect of nonlinearity. ( a ) Maximum gradient in η space of the u ( η ) ∼ f ′ ( η ) profile. ( b ) Vorticity thickness spreading rate σ δ ω ′ = ( 1 − r ) / | f ″ | max from which σ can be determined from measurement of δ ω ′ ... More
Image
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Fig. 4 Comparison of u velocity profiles for cases with r > 0. The values of σ were determined from Eq. (A4) using vorticity thickness measurements reported in the experiments. ( a ) r = 0.143, δ ω ′ = 0.134 , σ = 17.4 , and r = 0.382, δ ω ′ = 0.... More
Image
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Fig. 1 Sketch of the flow configuration. Vibration of the lower plate generates movement of the upper plate with velocity U top which is one of the unknowns. More
Image
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Fig. 2 Variations of the upper plate velocity U top / A 2 as: functions of the wave phase speed c and wave number α ( a ), a function of α ( b ), and as a function of c ( c ; dashed lines show proportionality to c ). The data has been multiplied by 10 −3 in ... More
Image
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Fig. 3 Distributions of pressure at the lower plate (( a ): c = 5 ; ( b ): c = 250 ) and of the x -component of pressure force (( c ): c = 5 ; ( d ): c = 250 ). Dashed lines represent wave shape. More
Image
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Fig. 4 Distributions of the x -component of the shear force acting on the fluid at the lower plate σ X v , L / A 2 (( a ): c = 5 and ( b ): c = 250 ). Dashed lines represent wave shape. More
Image
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Fig. 5 Distributions of the u -velocity component at x / λ = 0 , 0.25 , 0.5 , 0.75 for A = 0.01 , α = 0.1 , 2 , 20 , and c = 5 More
Image
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Fig. 6 Variations of energy dissipation DIS / ( λ A 2 ) ( a ), the shear work done at the vibrating plate VWORK / ( λ A 2 ) ( b ), and the pressure work done at the vibrating plate RHS 1 / ( λ A 2 ) ( c ) as functions of the vibration ... More
Image
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Fig. 7 Variations of the force F xvU / A 2 are required to prevent the movement of the upper plate as a function of α More
Image
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Fig. 8 Sketch of wave shapes subject to analysis More
Image
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Fig. 9 Variations of the upper plate velocity U top / B 2 for triangular waves made of distinct adjacent elements ( d = 0 ) as functions of the wave number α for different levels of tiltings T ( a ) and as functions of the tilt parameter T for alpha = 0.... More
Image
Published Online: August 18, 2022
Fig. 10 Variations of the upper plate velocity U top / B 2 as functions of the wave number α for : the symmetric trianglar waves placed at distances d apart ( a ) and triangular tilted waves placed at a distance b = 3λ/4 apart ( b ). Data for T = ± 0.125 ... More
Journal Articles
Accepted Manuscript
Journal:
Journal of Fluids Engineering
Article Type: Research-Article
J. Fluids Eng.
Paper No: FE-22-1164
Published Online: August 12, 2022
Journal Articles
Journal:
Journal of Fluids Engineering
Article Type: Research-Article
J. Fluids Eng. December 2022, 144(12): 121201.
Paper No: FE-22-1145
Published Online: August 8, 2022
Journal Articles
Journal:
Journal of Fluids Engineering
Article Type: Research-Article
J. Fluids Eng. December 2022, 144(12): 121203.
Paper No: FE-22-1171
Published Online: August 8, 2022
Journal Articles
Journal:
Journal of Fluids Engineering
Article Type: Research-Article
J. Fluids Eng. December 2022, 144(12): 121404.
Paper No: FE-22-1167
Published Online: August 8, 2022