Squeeze film dampers (SFDs) with low levels of external pressurization and poor end sealing are prone to air entrapment, thus not generating enough damping capability. Single frequency, unidirectional load tests were conducted on a SFD test rig replicating a commercial jet-engine configuration. The damper journal is 2.54cm in length and 12.7cm in diameter, with nominal clearance of 0.127mm. The SFD feed end is flooded with oil, while the discharge end contains a recirculation groove and four orifice ports, and a mechanical seal ring in contact with the damper journal. A wave spring pushes the ring ensuring tight sealing to prevent gas ingestion. The mechanical seal also serves to contain the lubricant within the squeeze film land for extended periods of time and; while in operation, to prevent contamination of the ball bearing cartridge. The measurements conducted without and with lubricant in the squeeze film lands, along with a frequency domain identification procedure, render the mechanical seal dry-friction force and viscous damping force coefficients as functions of frequency and motion amplitude. The end seal arrangement is quite effective in eliminating side leakage and preventing air entrainment into the film lands. Importantly enough, the dry friction force, arising from the contact forces in relative motion, increases significantly the test element equivalent viscous damping coefficients. The identified system damping coefficients are thus frequency and motion amplitude dependent, albeit decreasing rapidly as the motion parameters increase. Identified squeeze film force coefficients, damping and added mass, agree well with predictions based on the full film, short length damper model.

1.
Zeidan
,
F. Y.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
, 1996, “
Design and Application of Squeeze Film Dampers in Rotating Machinery
,”
Proc. 25th Turbomachinery Symposium
,
Houston, TX
, September 17–19, pp.
169
188
.
2.
Della Pietra
,
L.
, and
Adiletta
,
G.
, 2002, “
The Squeeze Film Damper over Four Decades of Investigations. Part I: Characteristics and Operating Features
,”
Shock Vib. Dig.
0583-1024,
34
(
1
), pp.
3
26
.
3.
Della Pietra
,
L.
, and
Adiletta
,
G.
, 2002, “
The Squeeze Film Damper over Four Decades of Investigations. Part II: Rotordynamic Analyses with Rigid and Flexible Rotors
,”
Shock Vib. Dig.
0583-1024,
34
(
2
), pp.
97
126
.
4.
San Andrés
,
L.
, 2006, “
SFD Design and Operation
,” Modern Lubrication Course Notes No. 12, http://phn.tamu.edu/TRIBGrouphttp://phn.tamu.edu/TRIBGroup
5.
Levesley
,
M.
, and
Holmes
,
R.
, 1996, “
The Effect of Oil Supply and Sealing Arrangements on the Performance of Squeeze-Film Dampers: an Experimental Study
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J: J. Eng. Tribol.
1350-6501,
210
(
4
), pp.
221
232
.
6.
De Santiago
,
O.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
, 1999, “
Imbalance Response and Damping Force Coefficients of a Rotor Supported on End Sealed Integral Squeeze Film Dampers
,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-203.
7.
Arauz
,
G.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
, 1997, “
Experimental Force Response of a Grooved Squeeze Film Damper
,”
Tribol. Int.
0301-679X,
30
(
1
), pp.
77
86
.
8.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J.
, 1986, “
Experimental Measurements of the Dynamic Pressure Distribution in a Squeeze-Film Bearing Damper Executing Circular-Centered Orbit
,”
ASLE Trans.
0569-8197,
30
(
3
), pp.
373
383
.
9.
Kim
,
K.
, and
Lee
,
C.
, 2005, “
Dynamic Characteristics of Sealed Squeeze Film Damper With a Central Feeding Groove
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
127
(
1
), pp.
103
111
.
10.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
De Santiago
,
O.
, 2004, “
Forced Response of a Squeeze Film Damper and Identification of Force Coefficients from Large Orbital Motions
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
126
(
2
), pp.
292
300
.
11.
Diaz
,
S.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
, 2001, “
A Model for Squeeze Film Dampers Operating with Air Entrainment and Validation with Experiments
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
123
(
1
), pp.
125
133
.
12.
San Andrés
,
L.
,
Diaz
,
S.
, and
Rodriguez
,
L.
, 2001, “
Sine Sweep Load Versus Impact Excitations and their Influence on the Damping Coefficients of a Bubbly Oil Squeeze Film Damper
,”
Tribol. Trans.
1040-2004,
44
(
4
), pp.
692
698
.
13.
Delgado
,
A.
, 2005, “
Identification of Force Coefficients in a Squeeze Film Damper with a Mechanical Seal
,” Master of Science thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station TX.
14.
Ginsberg
,
J. H.
, 2001,
Mechanical and Structural Vibrations
,
Wiley
,
New York
, pp.
135
139
.
16.
Delgado
,
A.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
, 2005, “
Identification of Structural Stiffness and Damping Coefficients of a Shoed Brush Seal
,” ASME Paper No. DETC 2005–84159.
17.
San Andrés
,
L.
, 2005, “
Fluid Inertia in Thin Film Flows
,” personal communication—Research Notes, Tribology Group,
Texas A&M University, Turbomachinery Laboratory
, College Station, TX.
You do not currently have access to this content.