Experimental Investigation of Fuel Anti-Knock-Index Requirements in Three Small Two-Stroke Engines for Remotely Piloted Aircraft

Small remotely piloted aircraft (10–25 kg) that are powered by internal combustion engines typically operate on gasoline with an anti-knock index (AKI) > 80. To comply with the single-battlefield-fuel initiative [Department of Defense (DoD) Directive 4140.25], interest has increased in converting power plants for these platforms to run on low-AKI fuels such as diesel and Jet-A with AKIs of ∼20. It has been speculated that the higher losses (short circuiting, incomplete combustion, heat transfer) that cause these engines to have lower efficiencies than their conventional-scale counterparts may also relax their required fuel AKI. The fuel-AKI requirements of three two-stroke spark ignition (SI) engines with 28, 55, and 85 cm³ displacements were mapped, and the performance was compared to that on 98 ON (octane number) fuel. Switching from 98 ON fuel to 20 ON (Jet-A and diesel equivalent AKI) fuel while maintaining optimum combustion phasing led to a 3–5 crank-angle degree (CAD) reduction in burn angle, a 2–3% increase in power, and a 0.5–1% (absolute) increase in fuel-conversion efficiency at non-knock-limited conditions through shortening of the CA0–CA10 burn angle. The efficiency improvement translates to a 6% increase in range or endurance. The results indicate that abnormal combustion is not a significant obstacle to operating small commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) engines on low-AKI fuels and that most of the power and efficiency improvements demonstrated in previous heavy-fuel conversion efforts were the result of modifications made to accommodate low-volatility fuels, not the faster burn rate of the low-AKI fuels themselves.