Reliable applications of adhesively bonded joints require understanding of the stress distribution along the bond-line and the stresses that are responsible for the joint failure. To properly evaluate factors affecting peel strength, effects of defects such as voids on the stress distribution in the overlap region must be understood. In this work, the peel stress distribution in a single lap joint is derived using a strength of materials approach. The bonded joint is modeled as Euler-Bernoulli beams, bonded together with an adhesive, which is modeled as an elastic foundation which can resist both peel and shear stresses. It is found that for certain adhesive and adherend geometries and properties, a central void with the size up to 50 percent of the overlap length has negligible effect on the peak peel and shear stresses. To verify the solutions obtained from the model, the problem is solved again by using the finite element method and by treating the adherends and the adhesive as elastic materials. It is found that the model used in the analysis not only predicts the correct trend for the peel stress distribution but also gives rather surprisingly close results to that of the finite element analysis. It is also found that both shear and peel stresses can be responsible for the joint performance and when a void is introduced, both of these stresses can contribute to the joint failure as the void size increases. Acoustic emission activities of aluminum-adhesive-aluminum specimens with different void sizes were monitored. The AE ringdown counts and energy were very sensitive and decreased significantly with the void size. It was observed that the AE events were shifting towards the edge of the overlap where the maximum peeling and shearing stresses were occurring as the void size increased.

1.
Schlickelmann
R. J.
, “
Past, Present, and Future of Structural Adhesive Bonding in Aerospace Application
,”
Trans. JSCM
, Vol.
5
, No.
1
2
. Dec.
1979
.
2.
Yurenka
S.
, “
Peel Testing of Adhesive Bonded Metal
,”
J. of Applied Polymer Science
, Vol.
4
, Issue No.
20
, pp.
136
144
,
1962
.
3.
Erdogan
F.
, and
Ratwani
M.
, “
Stress Distribution in Bonded Joints
,”
J. of Composite Materials
, Vol.
5
, pp.
378
393
,
1971
.
4.
Goland
M.
, and
Reissner
, “
The Stresses in Cemented Joints
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
1
, No.
1
, pp.
A.17-A.27
A.17-A.27
,
1944
.
5.
Erdogan
F.
, and
Civelek
M. B.
, “
Contact Problem for an Elastic Reinforcement Bonded to an Elastic Plate
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
41
, pp.
1014
1018
,
1974
.
6.
Delale
F.
,
Erdogan
F.
, and
Aydinoglu
M. N.
, “
Stresses in Adhesively Bonded Joints: A Closed Form Solution
,”
J. of Composite Materials
, Vol.
15
, May
1981
, p.
249
249
.
7.
Delale, F., and Erdogan, F., “Viscoelastic Analysis of Adhesively Bonded Joints,” NASA Contractor Properties, Part Performance, and Process Simulation, ASME 1991.
8.
Rossettos
J. N.
,
Lin
P.
, and
Nayeb-Hashemi
H.
, “
Comparison of the Effects of Debonds and Voids on Adhesive Joints
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
116
, pp.
533
538
.
1994
.
9.
Nayeb-Hashemi, H., and Rossettos, J. N., “Nondestructive Evaluation of Adhesively Bonded Joints by Acousto-Ultrasonic Technique and Acoustic Emission,” J. of Acoustic Emission, Vol. 12, Nos. 1/2, 1994.
10.
Williams
J. H.
, and
Lee
S.
, “
Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Fiber Composite Materials and Structures
,”
J. of Composite Materials
, Vol.
12
, Oct.
1978
, pp.
348
348
.
11.
Williams, J. H., Lee, S., and Wang, T. K., “Nondestructive Evaluation of Strength and Separation Modes in Adhesively Bonded Automative Glass Fiber Composites Single Lap Joints,” J. of Composite Materials, Vol. 21, Jan. 1987.
12.
Williams
J. H.
,
Lee
S.
, and
Wang
T. K.
, “
Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation of Automative Glass Fiber Composites
,”
J. of Comp. Materials
, Vol.
16
, pp.
20
39
, Jan.
1982
.
13.
Williams
J. H.
, and
Lee
S.
, “
Acoustic Emission/Rupture Load Characterizations of Double-Braided Nylon Rope
,”
Marine Technology
, Vol.
19
, No.
3
, pp.
268
271
, July
1982
.
14.
Williams
J. H.
, and
Lee
S.
, “
Acoustic Emission Characterization Using AE [Parameter] Delay
,”
Materials Evaluation
, Vol.
41
, No.
8
, pp.
961
966
, July
1983
.
15.
Nayeb-Hashemi, H., and Jawad, Oussama, “Application of Acousto-Ultrasonic Technique and Acoustic Emission in Evaluation of Bond Strength,” PVP-Vol. 295/NE-Vol. 16, Recent Advances in Structural Mechanics, ASME 1994.
16.
Hart-Smith, J., “Analysis and Design of Advanced Composite Bonded Joints,” NASA CR-2218, 1973.
17.
Blichfeldt, B., and McCarthy, J. E., “Analytical and Experimental Investigation of Aircraft Metal Structures Reinforced with Filamentary Composites,” NASA CR-2039, 1972.
18.
Ishai
O.
, and
Girshengorn
T.
, “
Strength of Bonded Aluminum-CFRP Single Lap Joints
,”
Adhesive Age
, Vol.
21
(
7
), pp.
25
30
,
1978
.
19.
Hart-Smith, L. J., “Designing Adhesive Bonds,” Adhesive Age, pp. 32, Oct. 1978.
20.
Crocombe
A. D.
, and
Adams
R. D.
, “
Peel Analysis Using the Finite Element Method
,”
J. Adhesion
, Vol.
12
, pp.
127
139
,
1981
.
21.
Olia, M., “Adhesively Bonded Joints,” Ph.D thesis. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston MA 02115.
22.
Curtis
G. J.
, “
Acoustic Emission Energy Relates to Bond Strength
,”
Nondestructive Testing
, Vol.
8
, No.
5
, pp.
249
257
, Oct.
1975
.
23.
Hill
R.
, “
The Use of Acoustic Emission for Characterizing Adhesive Joint Failure
,”
NDT International
, Vol.
10
, No.
2
, pp.
63
72
, Apr.
1977
.
24.
ASTM E976–94. “Standard Guide for Determining the Reproducibility of Acoustic Emission Sensor Response,” ASTM, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
25.
Nayeb-Hashemi, H., Rossettos, J. N., and Melo, A. P., “Multiaxial Fatigue Life Evaluation of Tubular Adhesively Bonded Joints,” Accepted and will appear in the Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, Vol. 17, 1997.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.