Compliance criteria are used to evaluate the general class of over-running clutches to determine which type is best suited to benefit from compliance. The criteria used in the evaluation include the presence and angle of rotation of revolute joints, the possibility for part count reduction, the presence of springs, possible reduction in weight, and the method of clutch engagement. Sprag, spring, roller or ball, and ratchet and pawl clutch types were evaluated, and the ratchet and pawl type of over-running clutch was demonstrated to be the most promising. Within this type of over-running clutch, different designs incorporating bending, tension, and compression loading of the pawls were explored to determine the best method for loading the pawls. The clutches were compared using the maximum output torque. It was determined that the clutch incorporating rigid pawls loaded in compression produced the largest output torque. The maximum output torque for this clutch was measured at 65.6 N-m.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
clutches, design engineering, rotating bodies, torque control
Topics:
Compression, Design, Springs, Tension, Torque, Rollers
1.
Bickford
,
J. H.
,
1968
, “
12 Ways to go 1 Way
,”
Mach. Des.
,
40
(
18
), pp.
112
–
115
.
2.
Wiebusch
,
C. F.
,
1939
, “
The Spring Clutch
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
6
, pp.
103
–
108
.
3.
Lowery
,
R. D.
, and
Mehrbrodt
,
A. W.
,
1976
, “
How to do More With Wrapped-Spring Clutches
,”
Mach. Des.
,
48
(
17
), pp.
78
–
83
.
4.
Orthwein, W. C., 1986, Clutches and Brakes Design and Selection, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York.
5.
South, D. W., and Mancuso, J. R., 1994, Mechanical Power Transmission Components, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York.
6.
Xu
,
T.
, and
Lowen
,
G. G.
,
1994
, “
A Mathematical Model of an Over-Running Sprag Clutch
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
29
(
1
), pp.
11
–
23
.
7.
Chironis, N. P., and Rossner, E. E., 1991, Mechanisms & Mechanical Devices Sourcebook, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York.
8.
French, M., 1997, “Prospects for Progress in Mechanical Design,” Keynote Lecture Delivered at DETC’97, Sacramento, California.
9.
Howell
,
L. L.
, and
Midha
,
A.
,
1995
, “
Parametric Deflection Approximations for End-Loaded, Large-Deflection Beams in Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
117
(
1
), pp.
156
–
165
.
10.
Howell
,
L. L.
,
Midha
,
A.
, and
Norton
,
T. W.
,
1996
, “
Evaluation of Equivalent Spring Stiffness for Use in a Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model of Large-Deflection Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
118
(
1
), pp.
126
–
131
.
11.
Roach, G. M., 1998, “An Investigation of Compliant Over-running Ratchet and Pawl Clutches,” M.S. Thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
12.
Howell
,
L. L.
, and
Midha
,
A.
,
1994
, “
A Method for the Design of Compliant Mechanisms with Small-Length Flexural Pivots
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
116
(
1
), pp.
280
–
290
.
13.
Mortensen, C. R., Weight, B. L., Howell, L. L., and Magleby, S. P., 2000, “Compliant Mechanism Prototyping,” Proceedings of the 26th Biennial Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, 2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Baltimore, Maryland, DETC2000/MECH-14204.
14.
Howell, L. L., and Midha, A., 1996, “Parametric Deflection Approximations for Initially Curved, Large-Deflection Beams in Compliant Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 96-DETC/MECH-1215.
15.
Roach, G. M., Lyon, S. M., and Howell, L. L., 1998, “A Compliant, Over-running Ratchet and Pawl Clutch with Centrifugal Throw-out,” Proceedings of the 1998 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, DETC98/MECH-5819.
16.
Roach, G. M., and Howell, L. L., 2000, “Compliant Ratchet and Pawl Over-running Clutch with Centrifugal Throw-out,” U.S. Patent No. 6,148,979, issued Nov. 21, 2000.
Copyright © 2002
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.