In this paper we present a workspace analysis methodology that can be applied for optimal design of cable-suspended planar parallel robots. The significant difference between regular parallel robots and cable-suspended parallel robots is that the cables in cable-suspended robots can only carry tension forces. The workspace of a planar cable robot is characterized as the set of points where a reference point of moving platform can reach with tensions in all suspension cables. In the design of cable-suspended parallel robots, the suspension points of the cables, size and shape of the moving platform are the design variables. The workspace area and global condition index are used as the objective functions to optimize the design parameters. The global condition index is a measure of isotropicity of the manipulator. The design variables are determined for different numbers of cables using both objective functions at a specified orientation and also at different orientations of moving platform. Experimental results to measure the workspace area demonstrate the effectiveness of this method.

1.
Albus
,
J.
,
Bostelman
,
R.
, and
Dagalakis
,
N.
, 1992, “
The NIST Robocarne
,”
J. Rob. Syst.
0741-2223,
10
, pp.
709
724
.
2.
Verhoeven
,
R.
, and
Hiller
,
M.
, 2000, “
Estimating the controllable workspace of tendon-based Stewart platforms
,”
The ARK ’00 (7th International Symposium on Advances in Robot Kinematics)
, pp.
277
284
.
3.
Alp
,
A. B.
, and
Agrawal
,
S. K.
, 2002, “
Cable suspended robots: Design, planning, and control
,”
Proc., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
,
IEEE
, New York, pp.
4275
4280
.
4.
Barrette
,
G.
, and
Gosselin
,
C. M.
, 2000, “
Kinematic analysis and design of planar mechanisms actuated with cables
,”
ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
, DETC/MECH-14091.
5.
Fattah
,
A.
, and
Agrawal
,
S. K.
, 2002a, “
Workspace and design analysis of cable-suspended planar parallel robots
,”
ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 27th Biennial Mechanisms and Robotics Conference
, DETC2002/MECH-34330.
6.
Fattah
,
A.
, and
Agrawal
,
S. K.
, 2002b, “
Design of cable-suspended planar robots for an optimal workspace
,”
Proc., Workshop on Fundamental Issues and Future Research Directions for Parallel Mechanisms and Manipulators
, pp.
195
202
.
7.
Gosselin
,
C. M.
and
Angeles
,
J.
, 1989, “
The optimum kinematics design of a spherical three-degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator
,”
ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom. Des.
0738-0666,
111
, pp.
202
207
.
8.
Angeles
,
J.
, 1997,
Fundamentals of robotics mechanical systems
,
Springer
, New York.
9.
Chablat
,
D.
,
Weneger
,
Ph.
,
Caro
,
S.
, and
Angeles
,
J.
, 2002, “
The isoconditioning loci of planar three-DOF parallel manipulators
,”
ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 27th Biennial Mechanisms and Robotics Conference.
, DETC2002/MECH-34268.
You do not currently have access to this content.