Shape control of adaptive structures using piezoelectric actuators has found a wide range of applications in recent years. In this paper, the problem of finding optimal distribution of piezoelectric actuators and corresponding actuation voltages for static shape control of a plate is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem. The two conflicting objectives considered are minimization of input control energy and minimization of mean square deviation between the desired and actuated shapes with constraints on the maximum number of actuators and maximum induced stresses. A shear lag model of the smart plate structure is created, and the optimization problem is solved using an evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithm: nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Pareto-optimal solutions are obtained for different case studies. Further, the obtained solutions are verified by comparing them with the single-objective optimization solutions. Attainment surface based performance evaluation of the proposed optimization algorithm has been carried out.

1.
Crawley
,
E. F.
, and
de Luis
,
J.
, 1987, “
Use of Piezoelectric Actuators as Elements of Intelligent Structures
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
25
(
10
), pp.
1373
1385
.
2.
Koconis
,
D.
,
Kollar
,
L.
, and
George
,
S.
, 1994, “
Shape Control of Composite Plates and Shells With Embedded Actuators II. Desired Shape Specified
,”
J. Compos. Mater.
0021-9983,
28
(
3
), pp.
262
285
.
3.
Mathew
,
J.
,
Sankar
,
B. V.
, and
Cattafesta
,
L. N.
, 2001, “
Finite Element Modeling of Piezoelectric Actuators for Active Flow Control Applications
,” AIAA Paper No. 2001-300.
4.
Chee
,
C.
,
Tong
,
L.
, and
Steven
,
G.
, 2000, “
A Buildup Voltage Distribution (BVD) Algorithm for Shape Control of Smart Plate Structures
,”
Comput. Mech.
0178-7675,
26
(
2
), pp.
115
128
.
5.
Sun
,
D.
, and
Tong
,
L.
, 2005, “
Energy Optimization in Local Shape Control of Structures With Nonlinear Piezoelectric Actuators
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
43
(
10
), pp.
2210
2217
.
6.
Kincaid
,
R. K.
, 1991, “
Minimization Distortion in Truss Structures: A Comparison of Simulated Annealing and Tabu Search
,”
32nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
, AIAA Paper No. 91-1095.
7.
Silva
,
S.
,
Ribeiro
,
R.
,
Rodrigues
,
J.
,
Vaz
,
M.
, and
Monteiro
,
J.
, 2004, “
The Application of Genetic Algorithms for Shape Control With Piezoelectric Patches—An Experimental Comparison
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
0964-1726,
13
, pp.
220
226
.
8.
Khorsand
,
A. R.
,
Akbarzadeh-T
,
M. R.
, and
Moin
,
H.
, 2006, “
Genetic Quantum Algorithm for Voltage and Pattern Design of Piezoelectric Actuator
,”
IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation
, pp.
2593
2600
.
10.
Deb
,
K.
,
Agrawal
,
S.
,
Pratap
,
A.
, and
Meyarivan
,
T.
, 2002, “
A Fast and Elitist Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II
,”
IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput.
1089-778X,
6
(
2
), pp.
182
197
.
11.
Deb
,
K.
, and
Kumar
,
A.
, 1995, “
Real-Coded Genetic Algorithms With Simulated Binary Crossover: Studies on Multi-Modal and Multi-Objective Problems
,”
Complex Syst.
0891-2513,
9
(
6
), pp.
431
454
.
12.
Fonseca
,
C. M.
, and
Fleming
,
P. J.
, 1996, “
On the Performance Assessment and Comparison of Stochastic Multi-Objective Optimizers
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving From Nature (PPSN)-IV
, Vol.
1141
, pp.
584
593
.
13.
Knowles
,
J.
, 2005, “
A Summary Attainment Surface Plotting Method for Visualizing the Performance of Stochastic Multi-Objective Optimizers
,”
Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on IEEE Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA-2005)
, pp.
552
557
.
14.
Deb
,
K.
, 2001,
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
,
Wiley
,
Chichester, England
.
15.
Leissa
,
A. W.
, 1969, “
Vibration of Plates
,”
NASA
Paper No. SP-160.
You do not currently have access to this content.