The optimal design level for onshore natural gas pipelines was explored through a hypothetical example, whereby the pipe wall thickness was assumed to be the sole design parameter. The probability distributions of the life-cycle costs of various candidate designs for the example pipeline were obtained using Monte-Carlo simulation. The life-cycle cost included the cost of failure due to equipment impact and external corrosion, and the cost of periodic maintenance actions for external corrosion. The cost of failure included both the cost of fatality and injury as well as the cost of property damage and value of lost product. The minimum expected life-cycle cost criterion and stochastic dominance rules were employed to determine the optimal design level. The allowable societal risk level was considered as a constraint in the optimal design selection. It was found that the Canadian Standard Association design leads to the minimum expected life-cycle cost and satisfies the allowable societal risk constraint as well. A set of optimal designs for a risk-averse decision maker was identified using the stochastic dominance rules. Both the ASME and CSA designs belong to the optimal design set and meet the allowable societal risk constraint.

1.
Rosenblueth
,
E.
, and
Mendoza
,
E.
, 1971, “
Reliability Optimization in Isostatic Structures
,”
J. Engrg. Mech. Div.
0044-7951,
97
, pp.
1625
1642
.
2.
Streicher
,
H.
, and
Rackwitz
,
R.
, 2004, “
Time-Variant Reliability-Oriented Structural Optimization and a Renewal Model for Life-Cycle Costing
,”
Probab. Eng. Mech.
0266-8920,
19
, pp.
171
183
.
3.
Rackwitz
,
R.
, and
Joanni
,
A.
, 2009, “
Risk Acceptance and Maintenance Optimization of Aging Civil Engineering Infrastructures
,”
Struct. Safety
0167-4730,
31
, pp.
251
259
.
4.
Goda
,
K.
, and
Hong
,
H. P.
, 2006, “
Optimal Seismic Design Considering Risk Attitude, Societal Tolerable Risk Level, and Life Quality Criterion
,”
J. Strut. Eng.
,
132
, pp.
2027
2035
. 0002-7820
5.
Wen
,
Y. K.
, 2001, “
Minimum Lifecycle Cost Design Under Multiple Hazards
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
0951-8320,
73
, pp.
223
231
.
6.
Zhou
,
J.
,
Rothwell
,
B.
,
Zhou
,
W.
, and
Nessim
,
M.
, 2006, “
Application of High-Grade Steels to Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines Using Reliability-Based Design Method
,”
Proceedings of IPC2006, Sixth International Pipeline Conference
,
ASME
,
Calgary, AB, Canada
, Paper No. IPC2006-10058.
7.
Levy
,
H.
, 1998,
Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making Under Uncertainty
,
Kluwer Academic
,
Boston, MA
.
8.
Nessim
,
M.
, and
Zhou
,
W.
, 2005, “
Guidelines for Reliability Based Design and Assessment of Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines
,” Gas Research Institute Report No. GRI-04/0229.
9.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, 1999,
Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems, ASME B31.8
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
New York
.
10.
Canadian Standard Association
, 2007,
Oil and Gas Pipeline System, Z662–07
,
Canadian Standard Association
,
Mississauga, ON, Canada
.
11.
Nessim
,
M.
,
Zhou
,
W.
,
Zhou
,
J.
,
Rothwell
,
B.
, and
McLamb
,
M.
, 2004, “
Target Reliability Levels for the Design and Assessment of Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines
,”
Proceedings of IPC2004, Fifth International Pipeline Conference
,
ASME
,
Calgary, AB, Canada
, Paper No. IPC2004-0321.
12.
Stephens
,
M.
, and
Nessim
,
M.
, 2006, “
A Comprehensive Approach to Corrosion Management Based on Structural Reliability Methods
,”
Proceedings of IPC2006, Sixth International Pipeline Conference
,
ASME
,
Calgary, AB, Canada
, Paper No. IPC2006-10458.
13.
Stephens
,
M. J.
,
Leewis
,
K.
, and
Moore
,
D. K.
, 2002, “
A Model for Sizing High Consequence Areas Associated With Natural Gas Pipelines
,”
IPC2002, Fourth International Pipeline Conference
,
ASME
,
Calgary, AB, Canada
, Paper No. IPC2002-27073.
14.
Daycock
,
J. H.
, and
Rew
,
P. J.
, 1997, “
Thermal Radiation Criteria for Vulnerable Population
,” Health Safety Executive Report No. 285/2000.
15.
Rothwell
,
B.
, and
Stephens
,
M.
, 2006, “
Risk Analysis of Sweet Natural Gas Pipelines—Benchmarking Simple Consequence Models
,”
Proceedings of the IPC2006, Sixth International Pipeline Conference
,
ASME
,
Calgary, AB, Canada
, Paper No. IPC2006-10059.
16.
Viscusi
,
W. K.
, and
Aldy
,
J. E.
, 2003, “
The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates Throughout the World
,”
J. Risk and Uncertainty
0895-5646,
27
, pp.
5
76
.
17.
Rodriguez
,
E. S.
, and
Provan
,
J. W.
, 1989, “
Development of a General Failure Control System for Estimating the Reliability of Deteriorating Structures
,”
Corrosion
,
45
(
3
), pp.
193
206
.
18.
Kiefner
,
J. F.
, and
Vieth
,
P. H.
, 1989, “
A Modified Criterion for Evaluating the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipe
,” American Gas Association Report No. PR 3-805.
You do not currently have access to this content.