The Atucha II nuclear power plant is a unique pressurized heavy water reactor (PHWR) being constructed in Argentina. The original plant design was by Kraftwerk Union (KWU) in the 1970's using the German methodology of break preclusion. The plant construction was halted for several decades, but a recent need for power was the driver for restarting the construction. The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC) developed leak-before-break (LBB) procedures in standard review plan (SRP) 3.6.3 Revision 1 for the purpose of eliminating the need to design for dynamic effects that allowed the elimination of pipe whip restraints and jet impingement shields. This SRP was originally written in 1987. The US NRC is currently developing a draft Regulatory Guide on what is called the transition break size (TBS). However, modeling crack pipe response in large complex primary piping systems under seismic loading is a difficult analysis challenge due to many factors. The initial published work (Wilkowski et al., “Robust LBB Analysis for Atucha II Nuclear Plant,” 2011 ASME PVP Conference, July 17–21, Baltimore, MD) on the seismic evaluations for the Atucha II plant showed that even with a seismic event with the amplitudes corresponding to the amplitudes for an event with a probability of 1 × 10−6 per year, that a double-ended guillotine break (DEGB) was pragmatically impossible due to the high leakage rates and total loss of make-up water inventory. The critical circumferential through-wall flaw size in that case was 94% of the circumference. This paper discusses further efforts to show how much higher the applied accelerations would have to be to cause a DEGB for an initial circumferential through-wall crack that was 33% around the circumference. This flaw length would also be easily detected by leakage and loss of make-up water inventory. These analyses showed that the applied seismic peak-ground accelerations had to exceed 25 g's for the case of this through-wall-crack to become a DEGB during a single seismic loading event. This is a factor of 80 times higher than the 1 × 10−6 seismic event accelerations, or 240 times higher than the safe shutdown earthquake (SSE) accelerations.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2013
Research-Article
Leak-Before-Break Under Beyond Design Basis Seismic Loading
Tao Zhang,
Tao Zhang
1
e-mail: tzhang@emc-sq.com
1Corresponding author.
Search for other works by this author on:
Heqin Xu,
Heqin Xu
Engineering Mechanics
3518 Riverside Dr. - Suite 202,
Corporation of Columbus
,3518 Riverside Dr. - Suite 202,
Columbus, OH 43221
Search for other works by this author on:
Oscar Mazzantini
Oscar Mazzantini
Nucleoelectrica Argentina S. A.
,Buenos Aires 2806
, Argentina
Search for other works by this author on:
Tao Zhang
e-mail: tzhang@emc-sq.com
Heqin Xu
Engineering Mechanics
3518 Riverside Dr. - Suite 202,
Corporation of Columbus
,3518 Riverside Dr. - Suite 202,
Columbus, OH 43221
Oscar Mazzantini
Nucleoelectrica Argentina S. A.
,Buenos Aires 2806
, Argentina
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. Manuscript received March 16, 2012; final manuscript received December 2, 2012; published online September 16, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Chong-Shien Tsai.
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. Oct 2013, 135(5): 051801 (9 pages)
Published Online: September 16, 2013
Article history
Received:
August 16, 2012
Revision Received:
December 2, 2012
Citation
Zhang, T., Brust, F. W., Wilkowski, G., Xu, H., Betervide, A. A., and Mazzantini, O. (September 16, 2013). "Leak-Before-Break Under Beyond Design Basis Seismic Loading." ASME. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. October 2013; 135(5): 051801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024442
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Latent Pitfalls in Microstructure-Based Modeling for Thermally Aged 9Cr-1Mo-V Steel (Grade 91)
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Thermal Stress Analysis of Compact Heat Exchanger Produced by Additive Manufacturing
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
An Improved Model for Predicting Affected Region of Flashing Jet
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Crack Growth Prediction Based on Uncertain Parameters Using Ensemble Kalman Filter
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Related Articles
Dynamic Analysis and Earthquake Resistant Design, Volume 2: Methods of Dynamic Analysis
Appl. Mech. Rev (July,2001)
Dynamic Analysis of Rotating Beams with Nonuniform Cross Sections Using the Dynamic Stiffness Method
J. Vib. Acoust (October,2001)
A Note on the Post-Flutter Dynamics of a Rotating Disk
J. Appl. Mech (November,2002)
An Experimental Study on the Seismic Response of Base-Isolated Secondary Systems
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,2002)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Use of PSA in Lisencing of EPR 1600 in Finland (PSAM-0160)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Lessons Learned: NRC Experience
Continuing and Changing Priorities of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes and Standards
Development of Nuclear Boiler and Pressure Vessels in Taiwan
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 3, Third Edition