Abstract

Tensegrity structures become important components of various engineering structures due to their high stiffness, light weight, and deployable capability. Existing studies on their dynamic analyses mainly focus on responses of their nodal points while overlook deformations of their cable and strut members. This study proposes a non-contact approach for the experimental modal analysis of a tensegrity structure to identify its three-dimensional (3D) natural frequencies and full-field mode shapes, which include modes with deformations of its cable and strut members. A 3D scanning laser Doppler vibrometer is used with a mirror for extending its field of view to measure full-field vibration of a novel three-strut metal tensegrity column with free boundaries. Tensions and axial stiffnesses of its cable members are determined using natural frequencies of their transverse and longitudinal modes, respectively, to build its theoretical model for dynamic analysis and model validation purposes. Modal assurance criterion (MAC) values between experimental and theoretical mode shapes are used to identify their paired modes. Modal parameters of the first 15 elastic modes of the tensegrity column identified from the experiment, including those of the overall structure and its cable members, can be classified into five mode groups depending on their types. Modes paired between experimental and theoretical results have MAC values larger than 78%. Differences between natural frequencies of paired modes of the tensegrity column are less than 15%. The proposed non-contact 3D vibration measurement approach allows accurate estimation of 3D full-field modal parameters of the tensegrity column.

References

1.
Zhang
,
J.
, and
Ohsaki
,
M.
,
2015
,
Tensegrity Structures
,
Springer
,
Tokyo
.
2.
Ali
,
N. B. H.
,
Rhode-Barbarigos
,
L.
,
Albi
,
A. A. P.
, and
Smith
,
I. F.
,
2010
, “
Design Optimization and Dynamic Analysis of a Tensegrity-Based Footbridge
,”
Eng. Struct.
,
32
(
11
), pp.
3650
3659
.
3.
Gilewski
,
W.
,
Kłosowska
,
J.
, and
Obara
,
P.
,
2015
, “
Applications of Tensegrity Structures in Civil Engineering
,”
Procedia Eng.
,
111
, pp.
242
248
.
4.
Liedl
,
T.
,
Högberg
,
B.
,
Tytell
,
J.
,
Ingber
,
D. E.
, and
Shih
,
W. M.
,
2010
, “
Self-assembly of Three-Dimensional Prestressed Tensegrity Structures From DNA
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
,
5
(
7
), pp.
520
524
.
5.
Mirats-Tur
,
J. M.
, and
Camps
,
J.
,
2011
, “
A Three-DoF Actuated Robot
,”
IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag.
,
18
(
3
), pp.
96
103
.
6.
Liu
,
Y.
,
Bi
,
Q.
,
Yue
,
X.
,
Wu
,
J.
,
Yang
,
B.
, and
Li
,
Y.
,
2022
, “
A Review on Tensegrity Structures-Based Robots
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
168
, p.
104571
.
7.
Tibert
,
A.
, and
Pellegrino
,
S.
,
2002
, “
Deployable Tensegrity Reflectors for Small Satellites
,”
J. Spacecr. Rockets
,
39
(
5
), pp.
701
709
.
8.
Yuan
,
S.
,
Yang
,
B.
, and
Fang
,
H.
,
2018
, “
The Projecting Surface Method for Improvement of Surface Accuracy of Large Deployable Mesh Reflectors
,”
Acta Astronaut.
,
151
, pp.
678
690
.
9.
Yuan
,
S.
,
Yang
,
B.
, and
Fang
,
H.
,
2019
, “
Self-standing Truss With Hard-Point-Enhanced Large Deployable Mesh Reflectors
,”
AIAA J.
,
57
(
11
), pp.
5014
5026
.
10.
Pugh
,
A.
,
1976
,
An Introduction to Tensegrity
,
University of California Press
,
Oakland
, CA.
11.
Tibert
,
A.
, and
Pellegrino
,
S.
,
2011
, “
Review of Form-Finding Methods for Tensegrity Structures
,”
Int. J. Space Struct.
,
26
(
3
), pp.
241
255
.
12.
Koohestani
,
K.
,
2012
, “
Form-Finding of Tensegrity Structures Via Genetic Algorithm
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
49
(
5
), pp.
739
747
.
13.
Yuan
,
S.
, and
Zhu
,
W.
,
2021
, “
Optimal Self-stress Determination of Tensegrity Structures
,”
Eng. Struct.
,
238
, p.
112003
.
14.
Yuan
,
S.
, and
Yang
,
B.
,
2019
, “
The Fixed Nodal Position Method for Form Finding of High-Precision Lightweight Truss Structures
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
161
, pp.
82
95
.
15.
Mirjalili
,
S.
,
2015
, “
The Ant Lion Optimizer
,”
Adv. Eng. Softw.
,
83
, pp.
80
98
.
16.
Schek
,
H.-J.
,
1974
, “
The Force Density Method for Form Finding and Computation of General Networks
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
3
(
1
), pp.
115
134
.
17.
Micheletti
,
A.
, and
Williams
,
W.
,
2007
, “
A Marching Procedure for Form-Finding for Tensegrity Structures
,”
J. Mech. Mater. Struct.
,
2
(
5
), pp.
857
882
.
18.
Guest
,
S. D.
,
2011
, “
The Stiffness of Tensegrity Structures
,”
IMA J. Appl. Math.
,
76
(
1
), pp.
57
66
.
19.
Kan
,
Z.
,
Peng
,
H.
,
Chen
,
B.
,
Xie
,
X.
, and
Sun
,
L.
,
2019
, “
Investigation of Strut Collision in Tensegrity Statics and Dynamics
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
167
, pp.
202
219
.
20.
Ma
,
S.
,
Chen
,
M.
, and
Skelton
,
R. E.
,
2022
, “
Tensegrity System Dynamics Based on Finite Element Method
,”
Compos. Struct.
,
280
, p.
114838
.
21.
Djouadi
,
S.
,
Motro
,
R.
,
Pons
,
J.
, and
Crosnier
,
B.
,
1998
, “
Active Control of Tensegrity Systems
,”
J. Aerosp. Eng.
,
11
(
2
), pp.
37
44
.
22.
Yang
,
S.
, and
Sultan
,
C.
,
2016
, “
LPV State-Feedback Control of a Tensegrity-Membrane System
,”
2016 American Control Conference (ACC)
,
Boston, MA
,
July 6–8
,
IEEE
, pp.
2784
2789
.
23.
Wang
,
R.
,
Goyal
,
R.
,
Chakravorty
,
S.
, and
Skelton
,
R. E.
,
2020
, “
Model and Data Based Approaches to the Control of Tensegrity Robots
,”
IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett.
,
5
(
3
), pp.
3846
3853
.
24.
Sultan
,
C.
, and
Skelton
,
R.
,
2003
, “
Deployment of Tensegrity Structures
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
40
(
18
), pp.
4637
4657
.
25.
Kan
,
Z.
,
Peng
,
H.
,
Chen
,
B.
, and
Zhong
,
W.
,
2018
, “
Nonlinear Dynamic and Deployment Analysis of Clustered Tensegrity Structures Using a Positional Formulation FEM
,”
Compos. Struct.
,
187
, pp.
241
258
.
26.
Yang
,
S.
, and
Sultan
,
C.
,
2016
, “
Modeling of Tensegrity-Membrane Systems
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
82
, pp.
125
143
.
27.
Yang
,
S.
, and
Sultan
,
C.
,
2017
, “
A Comparative Study on the Dynamics of Tensegrity-Membrane Systems Based on Multiple Models
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
113
, pp.
47
69
.
28.
Yuan
,
S.
, and
Zhu
,
W.
,
2023
, “
A Cartesian Spatial Discretization Method for Nonlinear Dynamic Modeling and Vibration Analysis of Tensegrity Structures
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
270
, p.
112179
.
29.
Bossens
,
F.
,
De Callafon
,
R.
, and
Skelton
,
R.
,
2007
, “
Modal Analysis of a Tensegrity Structure—An Experimental Study
,”
Dep. Mech. Aerosp. Eng. Dyn. Syst.
Control Group, University of California
,
San Diego, CA
, pp.
1
20
.
30.
Małyszko
,
L.
, and
Rutkiewicz
,
A.
,
2020
, “
Response of a Tensegrity Simplex in Experimental Tests of a Modal Hammer at Different Self-Stress Levels
,”
Appl. Sci.
,
10
(
23
), p.
8733
.
31.
Yuan
,
K.
, and
Zhu
,
W.
,
2021
, “
Estimation of Modal Parameters of a Beam Under Random Excitation Using a Novel 3D Continuously Scanning Laser Doppler Vibrometer System and an Extended Demodulation Method
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
,
155
, p.
107606
.
32.
Yuan
,
K.
, and
Zhu
,
W.
,
2022
, “
In-Plane Operating Deflection Shape Measurement of an Aluminum Plate Using a Three-Dimensional Continuously Scanning Laser Doppler Vibrometer System
,”
Exp. Mech.
,
62
, pp.
1
10
.
33.
Yuan
,
K.
, and
Zhu
,
W.
,
2022
, “
A Novel General-Purpose Three-Dimensional Continuously Scanning Laser Doppler Vibrometer System for Full-Field Vibration Measurement of a Structure With a Curved Surface
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
540
, p.
117274
.
34.
Yuan
,
K.
, and
Zhu
,
W.
,
2023
, “
Identification of Modal Parameters of a Model Turbine Blade With a Curved Surface Under Random Excitation With a Three-Dimensional Continuously Scanning Laser Doppler Vibrometer System
,”
Measurement
,
214
, p.
112759
.
35.
Lyu
,
L.
,
Yuan
,
K.
, and
Zhu
,
W.
,
2024
, “
A Novel Demodulation Method With a Reference Signal for Operational Modal Analysis and Baseline-Free Damage Detection of a Beam Under Random Excitation
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
571
, p.
118068
.
36.
Yuan
,
K.
, and
Zhu
,
W.
,
2021
, “
Modeling of Welded Joints in a Pyramidal Truss Sandwich Panel Using Beam and Shell Finite Elements
,”
J. Vib. Acoust.
,
143
(
4
), p.
041002
.
37.
Yuan
,
K.
, and
Zhu
,
W.
,
2024
, “
A Novel Mirror-Assisted Method for Full-Field Vibration Measurement of a Hollow Cylinder Using a Three-Dimensional Continuously Scanning Laser Doppler Vibrometer System
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
,
216
, p.
111428
.
38.
Ewins
,
D.
,
2000
,
Modal Testing: Theory, Practice and Application
,
Wiley
,
London, UK
.
39.
Sultan
,
C.
,
2013
, “
Stiffness Formulations and Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Exponential Stability of Prestressable Structures
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
50
(
14–15
), pp.
2180
2195
.
40.
Zhang
,
J.
, and
Ohsaki
,
M.
,
2007
, “
Stability Conditions for Tensegrity Structures
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
44
(
11–12
), pp.
3875
3886
.
41.
Zhu
,
W.
, and
Ren
,
H.
,
2013
, “
An Accurate Spatial Discretization and Substructure Method With Application to Moving Elevator Cable-Car Systems—Part I: Methodology
,”
ASME J. Vib. Acoust.
,
135
(
5
), p.
051036
.
42.
Ren
,
H.
, and
Zhu
,
W.
,
2013
, “
An Accurate Spatial Discretization and Substructure Method With Application to Moving Elevator Cable-Car Systems—Part II: Application
,”
ASME J. Vib. Acoust.
,
135
(
5
), p.
051037
.
43.
Wu
,
K.
,
Zhu
,
W.
, and
Fan
,
W.
,
2017
, “
On a Comparative Study of an Accurate Spatial Discretization Method for One-Dimensional Continuous Systems
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
399
, pp.
257
284
.
44.
Pellegrino
,
S.
, and
Calladine
,
C. R.
,
1986
, “
Matrix Analysis of Statically and Kinematically Indeterminate Frameworks
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
22
(
4
), pp.
409
428
.
45.
Meirovitch
,
L.
,
1967
,
Analytical Methods in Vibrations
,
Macmillan
,
London, UK
.
You do not currently have access to this content.